I am not so keen about these "demand management" programs. They seem akin to me to giving a utility / local government authority to set your home's thermostat from afar, but in some ways could be even more impactful, in that for residents who have only an EV for transportation could be remotely denied power to charge up their sole means of transportation.
Personally, I think this is a slippery slope and will keep control over my own thermostat and EV charger, thank you very much. IMHO, utilities and state & local governments should focus on pricing & other policies that promote adequate generation & distribution to meet demand, not on artificial means to throttle / control demand. (The cost of power every month gives me all the incentive I need to manage my own power consumption conservatively.)
Here in Texas, where we have had some real grid reliability & capacity challenges of late, some people who happily gave up control over their "smart" home thermostats to enable remote demand control by utilities in exchange for a lower power rate screamed like stuck pigs when the utility actually began controlling home thermostats remotely, claiming they didn't know what they were doing in accepting lower power rates & "free, smart" thermostats.
In short, I am not sure what the "right" set of policies ought to be to balance these factors, but I am pretty sure that remote "demand management" should not be one of them.