Jim In Tucson
Well-Known Member
Really? 8” wheels? Photos please.
Sent from my iPhone using Inside EVs
Sent from my iPhone using Inside EVs
Really? 8” wheels? Photos please.
Sent from my iPhone using Inside EVs
I have these, same ones that @MichaelC has:
https://neuspeedrswheels.com/products/neuspeed-rse05-8805?variant=39655667892337
Actually, I have the 17"x7.5" ET40 version of that style: https://neuspeedrswheels.com/collections/mini/products/nm-eng-rse05-nm8805?variant=31935769837681
View attachment 20424
Looking forward to your photos. MINI never offered OEM 18-inch wheels on the SE, but with the 40-aspect-ratio tires they look great on any MINI. I assume these open wheels will make you want to paint (or cover) your brake calipers.Those look great!!!
I just ordered a set of the RSe11Rs, went 225/40-18 Hankook Ventus S1 EVO2 tires because they were one of the several OE rubbers offered on the SE. Will post pics as soon as they're mounted![]()
Definitely! Probably a JCW upgrade and some paint.Looking forward to your photos. MINI never offered OEM 18-inch wheels on the SE, but with the 40-aspect-ratio tires they look great on any MINI. I assume these open wheels will make you want to paint (or cover) your brake calipers.
It's great that Tire Rack was on your side rather than claiming you shouldn't have tried to run after the police had time to call another cruiser to lay down a tire-shredder strip.After ~4620mi, my BFGoodrich Comp 2 A/S tires are toast. Large full width slice across all 4 tires and noticable vibration on the highway.
It's great that Tire Rack was on your side rather than claiming you shouldn't have tried to run after the police had time to call another cruiser to lay down a tire-shredder strip.
The way I read it is that tire rack was actually claiming that the damage was due to high torque and such as opposed to road hazard, therefore the tires were not covered by their roadside hazard coverage.
Instead, they were covered by the manufacturer warranty by continental.
So tire rack was not on his/her/their side in terms of honoring tire rack roadside hazard protection.
The explanation my buddy told me they told him is that the crack is at the seam where the band of tread meets. Supposedly a bond is created from the heat cycles in "ordinary" driving. If the car is subjected to hard braking or acceleration, the pressure at the seam causes the crack. They then told him that he should have paid for the tires to be heat cycled.I’d love to know how the rear tires split from either “high torque” or “hard braking.” That sounds like a crock.
Not shooting the messenger, but this is the first time I’ve heard of this and I can’t be the only one. This car has 199 lbf•ft of torque, about the same as an early-90s Eagle Talon. I find it ludicrous that they’d have the coglioni to blame the tires’ defects on the driver.They then told him that he should have paid for the tires to be heat cycled.