SE autocross and suspension thread.

  • Thread starter Thread starter pictsidhe
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 60
  • Views Views 10K
Thanks again for the insights! How bad was it pulling the subframe back rather than dropping with gravity assist? Do you think it would have been much easier on a lift? Also, how floppy was the battery box, like should I be ready with a scissor jack or something to support it while abusing the subframe?

I ordered the 22mm NMeng. bar and Whiteline adjustable links. I did not spring for the grease fitting mounts.
Disconnecting the tiebars make this job an order of magnitude easier. It was nightmare without doing that. It's much quicker and easier when you aren't wrestling it. You only need to remove a few battery bolts on to the rear subframe. The battery looked very solid. Consider that it is bracing the rear subframe...
 
I tried it last year during SCCA races. It gave me more power out of tight turns and the tires were spinning lots, but it also cut the abs completely and I was having a really hard time slowing down in a hurry without locking up, making lots of expensive smoke.
On another note, I had my 1st event in EVX last Sunday, after lowering on H&R springs and Bilstein B8 shocks in the back. I also mounted 225/45/17 Falken rt615's on Motegi Tracklights 17x8.5 42 et. I had some rubbing in the back and had to cut the plastic wheel well arch and also use some spacers under the spring insulators. Also cambered the rear wheels to the max. I wish I'd gone with less of a drop. Anyway, I came in 1st in EVX class, beating 2 Tesla model 3 performance and a model S plaid! That after being told I wasn't going to be competitive against them when I showed up. Next, I'll be installing adjustable camber plates up front for some negative camber to keep my tires from peeling like last year.
Damn, do I need to find a set of huge 15" wheels, now?
 
I opted not to change the rear bar after being no-bid by a local performance shop and then STRONGLY dissuaded by the dealership. The dealership said it was at least a 9 hour job and if anything goes wrong it's off-warranty. I think the dealership probably fully discharges the battery and electrically disconnects the box that blocks the required bolts, drops the subframe on a special jack attachment, then goes thru a comprehensive battery reset and check. Hat's off to @pictsidhe, apparently it's doable, carefully, by a more experienced mechanic than myself without bothering the battery... much.

You know what makes me wanna cry? The front ASB bracket bolts in from below! You can reach the back of the rear bracket with your hand... WTF did they not make the back like the front? First photo showing my hand where the rear bracket bolt heads SHOULD be, second photo is the front bracket with the ends of the screws poking through the top. I think it's entirely possible to put threads in the bracket and insert the bolts from underneath. Once you get the stuff out.
 

Attachments

  • PXL_20240510_180203183.webp
    PXL_20240510_180203183.webp
    52.5 KB · Views: 23
  • PXL_20240510_180327692.webp
    PXL_20240510_180327692.webp
    46 KB · Views: 21
That’s weird that they want to discharge the battery. That either means they would discharge it to 0 volts, which would irreparably damage it, or just discharge it to 0% usable capacity, which would leave it at over 300V which is still plenty dangerous.
 
According to my bathroom scale it come in at an even 4lbs. Weighed myself with and without it three times to ensure I got a consistent measure.
 
That’s weird that they want to discharge the battery. That either means they would discharge it to 0 volts, which would irreparably damage it, or just discharge it to 0% usable capacity, which would leave it at over 300V which is still plenty dangerous.

I'm just speculating about the discharge but it would partly explain why the job takes so long. I'm sure BMW/MINI would rather have a brief plasma ball than burn the whole shop down. The voltage is still the same personnel hazard as you said. I hope each battery box is independently fused, but you can't anticipate all the ways things could go sideways.

Just like bolting the rear bar bracket in from the wrong side, it seems they just phoned in the procedure without considering alternatives like pictsidhe worked out (detaching control arms to facilitate minimum disturbance to the batter box).
 
View attachment 23069

Looks to be 22mm, will get you a weight shortly!

4 pound is very light, I wonder if it's tubular? That would be awesome actually.

The NM Engineering 22mm bar is um.. 22mm diameter basically 7/8". Measured 9 lb. 11 oz at the limit of my 10# food scale, and 10.1 lbs net with me on the bathroom scale.

https://neuspeed.com/collections/mi...nm-eng-anti-sway-bar-rear-22mm-sport-nm258846
Unlike the photo, is has collars welded on by the brackets to keep it centered on the car.
 
I opted not to change the rear bar after being no-bid by a local performance shop and then STRONGLY dissuaded by the dealership. The dealership said it was at least a 9 hour job and if anything goes wrong it's off-warranty. I think the dealership probably fully discharges the battery and electrically disconnects the box that blocks the required bolts, drops the subframe on a special jack attachment, then goes thru a comprehensive battery reset and check. Hat's off to @pictsidhe, apparently it's doable, carefully, by a more experienced mechanic than myself without bothering the battery... much.

You know what makes me wanna cry? The front ASB bracket bolts in from below! You can reach the back of the rear bracket with your hand... WTF did they not make the back like the front? First photo showing my hand where the rear bracket bolt heads SHOULD be, second photo is the front bracket with the ends of the screws poking through the top. I think it's entirely possible to put threads in the bracket and insert the bolts from underneath. Once you get the stuff out.
No way it should take an experienced tech 9 hours. Show someone this amateurs instructions in post 4.
I removed a few battery bolts that brace the rear subframe and didn't go near any wiring other than the rear brake pad warning. It's fiddly in places, but if I can do it with my XXL hands, anyone can.
 
I'm holding on to my NM 22mm rear bar for now. I had high hopes for a local competition-oriented shop who said they would do it. But I brought my SE there for a wheel alignment (done to GP3 specs, which came out really well) unfortunately they failed to torque my lug nuts and my wheels were a bit wobbly by the time I got home. IDK if I can trust them with inaccessible fasteners...

And if I do this, I would plan to make body brackets that bolt in from underneath, so when the inevitable squeaking sets in, basic maintenance can be done without a huge production.
 
Last edited:
I'm holding on to my NM 22mm rear bar for now. I had high hopes for a local competition-oriented shop who said they would do it. But I brought my SE there for a wheel alignment (done to GP3 specs, which came out really well) unfortunately they failed to torque my lug nuts and my wheels were a bit wobbly by the time I got home. IDK if I can trust them with inaccessible fasteners...

And if I do this, I would plan to make body brackets that bolt in from underneath, so when the inevitable squeaking sets in, basic maintenance can be done without a huge production.
I did wonder about drilling the threads out to fit through bolts from underneath, then weld nuts on the brackets. But it looked very difficult to do straight with the subframe in the car, you still need to move the subframe to get the bar in and out... Grease nipples on the brackets may help. Though mine squeaked on one side no matter how many grease shots I gave it. I am seriously considering making my own hollow bar, and casting rubber bushings on like the factory does. That damn squeaking...

What are the GP3 specs? I have tweaked front and rear toe a little, but don't have the figures. Rear camber adjusters are maxed out giving -1.8 Front is at -1 with crash repair knuckles. It's a decent compromise between daily dodging and autocross. Daily tyre wear is pretty even. I'm at 31,000 miles and still on stock summers and 1st Nokian WR-G4 winters. Looks like summers will last to around 50k, winters longer. I've recently been playing with adding several turns of toe out for events while changing wheels. Parts are marked to make resetting for daily use simple. I only do one side, so the crooked steering wheel tells me its in cone-mode...
 
Hm, I understand that the subframe has to slide back to access the bolt heads for the brackets... but if it still has to move to swap the bar, then there's less motivation to do surgery other than the foreseeable bushing replacement. Hollow rocks! I wonder if wrapping the bar in very thin UHMW tape under the bushings would improve the situation. or https://www.mcmaster.com/7960K241/
The hassle of disassembly discourages experimentation.

GP3 specs aren't too much different even though the ride height is lowered. A little more camber and a little less toe. The attached specs are from a 9600 page workshop manual (which still does not include the SE) I downloaded from:
https://www.minif56.com/threads/f56-workshop-manual.95099/#replies
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1Npn7krDKhG2f6Y0ZVSpUcTbiPxazk_Nd

My car is now toe-out .05° front and .15° rear, very responsive but possibly number on-center. Probably not optimal, but I'll take that tradeoff. There is little or no adjustment directly for front camber, with the stock parts. Mine's now at -1° and -1.3°.

That's an interesting idea to change toe when changing wheels... why do only one side?
 

Attachments

Two reasons to do only one side:

1) it's easier and quicker!
2) if steering is straight when driving straight ahead, it is set at daily driver. If the wheel is left ( I only add toe out to the right) it is in set for cone dodging. As I turn a certain number of flats, this reminds me I may need to reset it... If you are less absent minded than me, go ahead and spend more time doing both sides for a few minutes of driving like you stole it.
Thanks for the GP3 alignment. I will measure my current alignment and compare. But I have a feeling my toe settings are already more aggressive, though camber is not. The main difference from the F56S is an extra -1° of front camber. The SE uses the GP3 front knuckles, but the raised ride height backs the camber off to -0.5°. Did you add front camber correction hubs? Mine was close to -0.5 front as stock. I added the correction hubs for an extra -0.5 to give -1. I maxed out rear camber hoping to slightly offset the loss of rear grip from the stiffer ARB. It's slightly less than S/GP3, but within tolerance. The reduced roll of the SE may well put dynamic camber slightly more favourable than the GP3. The stock rear camber is 0.5° less... Everyone comments on how little my car rolls. You have a lot of toe out at the back, isn't that tiring on highways?

I've decided to make some brackets to shorten the effective rear ARB arm for the last few events of this season. Since I don't spend much time autocrossing, weird link angles aren't going to trash bushes. Depending on how that feels, I may make a new bar for next year.
 
I see. I'm keeping with minimal changes because I like the car to behave consistently so I can get used to it more like 2nd nature.

Regarding front camber, I've lowered the ride height nearer to GP3 with the new "coilovers". The rest is non-adjustable stock, and I ended up with -1 and -1.3°. Rear camber ended up at -1.8 and -1.8°.

Regarding toe out, yes probably a little overboard. A bit busy on the highway, but I have it set to Sport mode making it more noticeable. I'm getting 4.8 mi/kWhr so can't comp[lain about rolling resistance. Tire wear we shall see...
 
I've decided to make some brackets to shorten the effective rear ARB arm for the last few events of this season. Since I don't spend much time autocrossing, weird link angles aren't going to trash bushes. Depending on how that feels, I may make a new bar for next year.

Yes, I looked at that possibility too. I think the spot weld flange above the top link needs some trimming, but then one could clamp on a machined bracket with a new hole above and forward from the existing upper pivot. Clamping to the flat where the existing hole is would provide enough stability.
 
Two reasons to do only one side:

1) it's easier and quicker!
2) if steering is straight when driving straight ahead, it is set at daily driver. If the wheel is left ( I only add toe out to the right) it is in set for cone dodging. As I turn a certain number of flats, this reminds me I may need to reset it... If you are less absent minded than me, go ahead and spend more time doing both sides for a few minutes of driving like you stole it.
Thanks for the GP3 alignment. I will measure my current alignment and compare. But I have a feeling my toe settings are already more aggressive, though camber is not. The main difference from the F56S is an extra -1° of front camber. The SE uses the GP3 front knuckles, but the raised ride height backs the camber off to -0.5°. Did you add front camber correction hubs? Mine was close to -0.5 front as stock. I added the correction hubs for an extra -0.5 to give -1. I maxed out rear camber hoping to slightly offset the loss of rear grip from the stiffer ARB. It's slightly less than S/GP3, but within tolerance. The reduced roll of the SE may well put dynamic camber slightly more favourable than the GP3. The stock rear camber is 0.5° less... Everyone comments on how little my car rolls. You have a lot of toe out at the back, isn't that tiring on highways?

I've decided to make some brackets to shorten the effective rear ARB arm for the last few events of this season. Since I don't spend much time autocrossing, weird link angles aren't going to trash bushes. Depending on how that feels, I may make a new bar for next year.
Do you have part numbers for the camber correction hubs?
 
Back
Top