I noticed that too!After updating the new app today, I now have charging history! It doesn't show anything yet because I haven't charged since the update but at least they're adding some features.
I never had a chance to try the old app so I don't know what I'm missing in the eDrive info
That 5.5 mi/kWh is one of my best ever, I usually get closer to 4.3 mi/kWh (which is still really good). I think the efficiency is a holdover from the ICE models for fuel efficiency, where it rates things like how quickly you accelerate and how hard you brake. Things that don't matter in an EV. But in one of the menus somewhere you can get the fish bowl on top of the car and can see the splashing water images.I never understood the efficiency numbers in the app. 5.5 m/kWh is fantastic.
Not on the 2021 SEs unfortunately. I miss that fish! Used to be under Minimalism Analyzer.That 5.5 mi/kWh is one of my best ever, I usually get closer to 4.3 mi/kWh (which is still really good). I think the efficiency is a holdover from the ICE models for fuel efficiency, where it rates things like how quickly you accelerate and how hard you brake. Things that don't matter in an EV. But in one of the menus somewhere you can get the fish bowl on top of the car and can see the splashing water images.
What the...... mine isn't there. No joke. Now I'm pissed as all get out. Seriously. Going to contact someone asap to find out why.The fish is still in the "MINIMALISM Analyser" on my 2021 SE, but only in Green modes.
View attachment 12722
That 5.5 mi/kWh is one of my best ever, I usually get closer to 4.3 mi/kWh (which is still really good). I think the efficiency is a holdover from the ICE models for fuel efficiency, where it rates things like how quickly you accelerate and how hard you brake. Things that don't matter in an EV. But in one of the menus somewhere you can get the fish bowl on top of the car and can see the splashing water images.
I gave up on the GOM long ago and use 1% battery = 1 mile as my judge of range. It's almost always too conservative, but at least it's consistent.I wonder why they wouldn't just remove those factors and tie it to the actual energy usage.