Thanks! I was worried the conversation might be too dry, but we've been getting positive feedback.Episode 68 is excellent. Really enjoyed it, especially the first part with Dan O'Shea of ABB --a great learning podcast!
You mean like the new 2022 bolt EUV? may have 3 year old battery nd charging tech, but everything else is on par with other new EVSWell, they are tending to talk about stuff that is new or in the works. They don't talk much about any models that are in production unless there is a big problem of some sort.
I definitely like the Taycan. I've loved the styling from the concept forward and finally had a chance to drive one a while back. Wasn't the Turbo S but still pretty punchy. It rides and handles nicely - a real joy to drive. Way out of my budget, of course, but I think it's important to have premium, aspirational cars be electric. Helps to sell the EV ownership to people with much more modest budgets.Managed to watch another episode (at 1.5 speed). I still say these are too long for the content covered. But I did hear some interesting points.
Seems like the Taycan is a real fav with these guys. Interesting what was said about the VW upper execs downgrading some aspects of the Audis to protect Porsche's position of top luxury brand. Made a lot of sense, though, to buy a 2 or 3 year old Taycan after the big depreciation years.
And I agree with the comments about needing a cheaper EV. That $25K China Tesla could do well here. Remember the venerable VW Beetle of the 60s? Or how the Japanese stole the small cheap car US market in the 70's from the big 3? That first Honda Civic/CVCC was quite a hit. We need something like this now here, to help us achieve that 50% EV sales by the end of the decade.
You guys ever think of bringing on a non-EV car enthusiast to your panel? Need some mainstream perspective, and not just preaching to the choir.
I think that is very true, with higher profits on more expensive cars, with lots of expensive options. But like before it took off-shore competitors to wake up the domestic big 3 (now only 2) with filling the need for cheaper cars. That may happen again, if they allow Chinese cars to be sold here.It's a challenge to get automakers serious about selling lower-cost cars. They're for-profit businesses and make a lot more margin on larger vehicles. They're very happy to sell the dream of crossovers in advertising and then insist they only build them because that's what consumers want.
Right. I understand why they choose the Model 3 SR, I just would have also like to see the Long Range in there as well, since that is as likely to be cross-shopped against the others mentioned. In my book, it would be ok if the cost of ownership was a bit higher than the gas cars, since it offers more performance and better environmental footprint than the combustion cars. And, maybe it's also less expensive, I don't know.One question raise was 'why not a Model 3 Long Range'? The answer is found:
https://www.epa.gov/compliance-and-fuel-economy-data/data-cars-used-testing-fuel-economy
The lighter, Std Rng Plus Model 3 is more efficient per mile than the Long Range AWD Model 3.
- Model: Std Rng Plus Model 3 / Long Range AWD
- Weight Lbs: 3875 / 4250
- HP: 265 / 393
- MPG: 178.2 / 170.1
Bob Wilson
I'm OK with this as my Std Rng Plus Model 3 is the VW bug version of the Tesla line. Yet it is much more comfortable and capable than the Toyota Prius Prime traded-in for the Model 3. I just wanted to add engineering insights for the community.the Long Range in there as well, since that is as likely to be cross-shopped against the others