... Are the offending particles suspended in the oil and thus are removed during the oil change? I remember a video where the gearbox was opened up and there was a ton of metallic sludge in it. Would you need to have the gearbox opened up to have it removed or was that example a far gone case? I'm curious about your thinking.
Particles that have not been sequestered by the internal magnet will mostly drain out with the oil because it takes a while for them to settle out.
100% of 20+ Kona owners have pulled out factory oil with particles present and in many cases discoloured black, both concerning issues because it means that particles are not being sequestered before being crushed to dust. Hardened steel particles will get momentarily hot in a microscopic sense when pounded by gears and bearings, hence the blackness and loss of magnetic attraction. We have four analyses indicating the oil contains high levels of iron and aluminium, further evidence that wear particles are not being sequestered properly (because particles over a certain size would not be included in the measured values).
Particles that have stuck to the internal magnet are out of the picture and won't cause a problem so there's no reason to open the gearbox. That failed Russian gearbox had catastrophic levels of particles generated as it was failing. It's
not a good example as to what happens normally.
If anyone drained their engine oil and found it looking as we are finding our gear oil they would be concerned. Note that engines have the benefit of an oil filter.
I love debates where layman's common sense challenges engineering theory. No offence to anyone on this forum, but it does make me wonder how these cars are designed and tested. Is it really that difficult given the vast knowledge and experience base over the past century?
Lol, that's the story of my life! As they say, "is this a hill you're willing to die on?" Sometimes it's best just to let nature takes its course but I'm willing to spend a bit of time trying to help fellow owners of the same car.
Had I even suspected Hyundai may have not done their best I would have changed my oil years ago. And I don't know that Hyundai would consider this a mistake because a very high percentage carry on without the owner needing to visit the dealer. The service life of a car is very short compared with industrial gearbox applications that run 24/7. Gearboxes are inherently tough and can chew metal for a while and survive, at the expense of noisy bearings. Most Konas will survive but its seems a few don't. I want to own one of the cars that survives and preferably drives quietly. I suspect others may as well.
If this theory is all true (build up of metallic particles in oil), why doesn't HYUNDAI issue a RECALL to have the oil swapped out? To just wait until a major issue develops and then replace expensive parts under Warranty seems counter productive.
I did the maths in the other thread some time ago and it's seemed to be far cheaper for Hyundai to replace gearboxes than do a recall. These are not expensive parts compared to the motor and battery. I did email the importer long ago but they didn't respond further.
... I do have to wonder what has changed in the replacement Reduction Gear component that stops this from occurring in the first place. or should I expect the issue just to occur again in 2 years, post Warranty??
There's no evidence one way or the other that anything has changed. When someone does an early first oil change and finds the oil relatively clean then we'll have something to work with. We need to have evidence to draw conclusions.
In USA here. Yea, I really don't want to go thru this again. :-(
You would think that doing an oil change might be a good idea if that's the case. People did this cars in long ago, an early oil change to get the machining debris out. Car engines now have oil filters and this gearbox doesn't.