Unitarians

  • Thread starter Thread starter bwilson4web
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 57
  • Views Views 5K
First came the Spirit followed by study. Then confirmation from following and observing the effects of how Jesus taught us to live.

The virtues taught by Jesus brings us closer to ithe Kingdom of God.

Bob Wilson
I know people will tend to believe what they want. But when talking about going to heaven, wouldn't it be important to understand exactly what Jesus says about that? IE you must accept him as saviour as outlined above. Is that included in what you believe?
 
I know people will tend to believe what they want. But when talking about going to heaven, wouldn't it be important to understand exactly what Jesus says about that? IE you must accept him as saviour as outlined above. Is that included in what you believe?
Good points, let's address them:
  • "What Jesus says about that?" - correct but we have a problem with the technology for recording what Jesus said. So I use:
    • multiple contemporaneous sources that say effectively the same thing
    • apostles writings are nice but just another interpretation
  • "accept him as savior" - which is a construct not seen in Jesus quotes. He speaks of the "Kingdom of God" without any evidence of when and where except by living the life he taught us to live.
  • "what you believe?" - God is; Jesus taught us how to live to bring the Kingdomw of God; what happens after death is less important than what we do in this life.
Bob Wilson
 
Good points, let's address them:
  • "What Jesus says about that?" - correct but we have a problem with the technology for recording what Jesus said. So I use:
    • multiple contemporaneous sources that say effectively the same thing
    • apostles writings are nice but just another interpretation
  • "accept him as savior" - which is a construct not seen in Jesus quotes. He speaks of the "Kingdom of God" without any evidence of when and where except by living the life he taught us to live.
  • "what you believe?" - God is; Jesus taught us how to live to bring the Kingdomw of God; what happens after death is less important than what we do in this life.
Bob Wilson
Re 2nd point, you're right, can't expect that as a Jesus quote as he is not dead yet. But other scriptures explain that he died and rose up, for our sins and believing and accepting that is our path to heaven. Since I am far from any expert on the scriptures, would like to hear from SD to explain that further.

I take it from your response you believe what you want, but not necessarily accept the whole Bible, in particular the apostles' Books and their interpretations.
 
The spirit you are communicating with has 'told' you that faith in Christ isn't necessary for salvation. Just 'following the teachings of Jesus', which somehow excludes the first 4 commandments and the 7th commandment.

Either trolling or just complete ignorance to what Jesus actually taught. Genuinely have no clue how someone can read scripture and come back believing what you do.
The "Sprit" is sensing a fraction of the Devine. It does not speak or write but touches my soul and happiness.

Theology is found in books, essays, and sermons. It is how we combine sparse spruces into a coherent view of "What is the Answer to the Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything?" But too often we find a tautology, the same thing twice in different words of John 3:16.

I take it from your response you believe what you want, but not necessarily accept the whole Bible, in particular the apostles' Books and their interpretations.
I note that there are Christians on both sides of conflicts citing what they believe justifies their point of view. Same source but opposite actions.

So I prefer empirical observations of what was taught and what is done.

Bob Wilson
 
The spirit you are communicating with has 'told' you that faith in Christ isn't necessary for salvation. Just 'following the teachings of Jesus', which somehow excludes the first 4 commandments and the 7th commandment.

Either trolling or just complete ignorance to what Jesus actually taught. Genuinely have no clue how someone can read scripture and come back believing what you do.
The "Sprit" is sensing a fraction of the Divine. It does not speak or write but touches my soul and happiness.

Theology is found in books, essays, and sermons. It is how we combine sparse spruces into a coherent view of "What is the Answer to the Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything?" But too often we find a tautology, the same thing twice (or more) in different words of Jonh 3:16.

I don't fault those who choose to believe John 3:16 as long as they discuss things sensibly. What I do object to are those who would force their faith on me or others. For example, Oklahoma insists on Bibles in the classroom. Collected with other great religious works, no problem. As part of a course on comparative religions and cultures, a good thing. But proselytizing makes the Bible as popular as the Tax code.

Bob Wilson
 
Last edited:
So, Bob, if I understand you correctly, you don't believe all parts of the Bible, just those that suit your beliefs. If you are wrong, the consequences are pretty dire.

I am seeking the truth, and want to be sure I make it to heaven. However, I certainly don't understand it all which is why I have so many questions.
 
I don't understand what that means. Can you elaborate what the Kingdom of God in this life looks like. And do you believe in Heaven?
 
I don't understand what that means. Can you elaborate what the Kingdom of God in this life looks like. And do you believe in Heaven?
The Kingdom of God is living as Jesus taught us. It is not a monolith as much as how we treat each other in our daily lives.

As for "Heaven," we'll find out post mortem. Jesus teaches us how to live our lives to bring the Kingdom of God. That is enough.

Bob Wilson
 
I don't understand what that means. Can you elaborate what the Kingdom of God in this life looks like. And do you believe in Heaven?
In short the Kingdom of God is the Kingdom of Heaven. When Christ comes a second time, what will happen is that this current world will be destroyed and a restored world will replace it. Nobody can predict when this will happen, as scripture says that it will come like a thief in the night. Jesus even says as much too.

Matthew 24:36–44

No One Knows That Day and Hour

[36] “But concerning that day and hour no one knows, not even the angels of heaven, nor the Son, but the Father only. [37] For as were the days of Noah, so will be the coming of the Son of Man. [38] For as in those days before the flood they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day when Noah entered the ark, [39] and they were unaware until the flood came and swept them all away, so will be the coming of the Son of Man. [40] Then two men will be in the field; one will be taken and one left. [41] Two women will be grinding at the mill; one will be taken and one left. [42] Therefore, stay awake, for you do not know on what day your Lord is coming. [43] But know this, that if the master of the house had known in what part of the night the thief was coming, he would have stayed awake and would not have let his house be broken into. [44] Therefore you also must be ready, for the Son of Man is coming at an hour you do not expect. (ESV)

What Jesus means here is that the exact time of His second coming will not be revealed to us. It could happen one second from now or one million years from now. Nobody but God knows when it will happen.

When Jesus was asked about the Kingdom of God, this was his response to Pontious Pilate

John 18:33–38

My Kingdom Is Not of This World

[33] So Pilate entered his headquarters again and called Jesus and said to him, “Are you the King of the Jews?” [34] Jesus answered, “Do you say this of your own accord, or did others say it to you about me?” [35] Pilate answered, “Am I a Jew? Your own nation and the chief priests have delivered you over to me. What have you done?” [36] Jesus answered, “My kingdom is not of this world. If my kingdom were of this world, my servants would have been fighting, that I might not be delivered over to the Jews. But my kingdom is not from the world.” [37] Then Pilate said to him, “So you are a king?” Jesus answered, “You say that I am a king. For this purpose I was born and for this purpose I have come into the world—to bear witness to the truth. Everyone who is of the truth listens to my voice.” [38] Pilate said to him, “What is truth?”

After he had said this, he went back outside to the Jews and told them, “I find no guilt in him. (ESV)
Jesus says this because the Kingdom of God is not of this world - eg it is heaven.

Bob, if I understand you correctly, you don't believe all parts of the Bible, just those that suit your beliefs.
This is an accurate take. Its not even that hard to prove.

Matthew 19:1–12

Teaching About Divorce

[1] Now when Jesus had finished these sayings, he went away from Galilee and entered the region of Judea beyond the Jordan. [2] And large crowds followed him, and he healed them there.

[3] And Pharisees came up to him and tested him by asking, “Is it lawful to divorce one’s wife for any cause?” [4] He answered, “Have you not read that he who created them from the beginning made them male and female, [5] and said, ‘Therefore a man shall leave his father and his mother and hold fast to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh’? [6] So they are no longer two but one flesh. What therefore God has joined together, let not man separate.” [7] They said to him, “Why then did Moses command one to give a certificate of divorce and to send her away?” [8] He said to them, “Because of your hardness of heart Moses allowed you to divorce your wives, but from the beginning it was not so. [9] And I say to you: whoever divorces his wife, except for sexual immorality, and marries another, commits adultery.”

[10] The disciples said to him, “If such is the case of a man with his wife, it is better not to marry.” [11] But he said to them, “Not everyone can receive this saying, but only those to whom it is given. [12] For there are eunuchs who have been so from birth, and there are eunuchs who have been made eunuchs by men, and there are eunuchs who have made themselves eunuchs for the sake of the kingdom of heaven. Let the one who is able to receive this receive it.” (ESV)
Jesus did not specifically need to define marriage to answer this question, but He did. The obvious implication is that the actual definition of marriage is between a man and a woman. Even look at what Jesus considers the exception - A eunuch. Someone who is by definition cut off from marriage because they are either born with the capacity for celibacy, born without the capacity to reproduce, or are basically castrated. As I demonstrated before, Jesus himself also clearly states that sex outside of marriage is sinful too - ie fornication is a sin. So its pretty airtight what Jesus is teaching regarding marriage and sex.

So how do people like bob get around it? They claim that scripture isn't actually scripture, which is what bob is saying here:
"What Jesus says about that?" - correct but we have a problem with the technology for recording what Jesus said
As if the method that God used to record His own words weren't sufficient enough and that the literal God of the universe couldn't preserve the message He wanted people to here in the way He wanted them to.
  • multiple contemporaneous sources that say effectively the same thing
  • apostles writings are nice but just another interpretation
The hilarious part is that this is what God designed the New Testament to be, but its still not good enough for him and he just dismisses it as "their interpretation". Pretty arrogant if you think about it - especially from someone who keeps trying to apply the label Christian to himself. Unless this is all a joke. IDK. Its virtually impossible to tell because of how low effort bob's responses are.
 
The "Sprit" is sensing a fraction of the Devine. It does not speak or write but touches my soul and happiness.
This is incredibly shallow and does not comport with Jesus's teachings. Also strange how this "spirit" tells you treat things as moral when they directly contradict what Jesus said - eg marriage and sex and abortion actually being murder are the things that immediately come to mind.

Theology is found in books, essays, and sermons. It is how we combine sparse spruces into a coherent view of "What is the Answer to the Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything?" But too often we find a tautology, the same thing twice (or more) in different words of Jonh 3:16.
This is because scripture is supposed to inform how you live your life.
2 Timothy 3:16–17

[16] All Scripture is breathed out by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness, [17] that the man of God may be complete, equipped for every good work. (ESV)
>but eVolUtIoN and muh science!!!
I have had unitarians to my face in person deny human sexual dimorphism to my face. I have also had unitarians deny the obvious genetic differences between human races saying it was all fake then completely contradict themselves and tell me I owed an eternal blood guilt because I am white. So yeah, I honestly don't care what creationists believe about the fossil record - at least that isn't collapsing my civilization.


I note that there are Christians on both sides of conflicts citing what they believe justifies their point of view. Same source but opposite actions.

So I prefer empirical observations of what was taught and what is done.
Abortion has murdered far more people than any war you claim Christianity is responsible for.


I don't fault those who choose to believe John 3:16 as long as they discuss things sensibly. What I do object to are those who would force their faith on me or others. For example, Oklahoma insists on Bibles in the classroom. Collected with other great religious works, no problem. As part of a course on comparative religions and cultures, a good thing. But proselytizing makes the Bible as popular as the Tax code.
>I only like Christians when they allow me to impose my views in the public school system without any pushback.

No. I am not complying with your self hatred. Move somewhere else and destroy them with your nonsense. You are literally telling me that I can't propagate my culture to the children of my society in the education system I am forced to pay for. I will not tolerate the equivalent of spiritual flat earth being taught to my children as if its anywhere equal to the words of the God of the universe and I will not tolerate some culture that is incompatible with mine to be taught as if were equal or better than my own culture either.


"accept him as savior" - which is a construct not seen in Jesus quotes. He speaks of the "Kingdom of God" without any evidence of when and where except by living the life he taught us to live.

Jesus says it to the thief on the cross. Please actually read scripture. People like you really tempt me to have a Jonah mindset.
Luke 23:39–43

[39] One of the criminals who were hanged railed at him, saying, “Are you not the Christ? Save yourself and us!” [40] But the other rebuked him, saying, “Do you not fear God, since you are under the same sentence of condemnation? [41] And we indeed justly, for we are receiving the due reward of our deeds; but this man has done nothing wrong.” [42] And he said, “Jesus, remember me when you come into your kingdom.” [43] And he said to him, “Truly, I say to you, today you will be with me in paradise.” (ESV)
 
First off, thank you for your reply.

You've clearly explained your theology which reaffirms my Unitarian faith.

This is incredibly shallow and does not comport with Jesus's teachings. Also strange how this "spirit" tells you treat things as moral when they directly contradict what Jesus said - eg marriage and sex and abortion actually being murder are the things that immediately come to mind.
KISS (Keep It Simple Stupid) is an engineering principal that I apply in life. Occam's razor: "when competing explanations exist for the same phenomenon, the one with the fewest assumptions (the simplest) is usually the best to start with." So yes, "incredibly shallow' is what following KISS may look like to those whose faith is a 'house of cards'..

Actually, "Jesus's teachings" are not that hard to understand and follow. As for "this "spirit"", it doesn't speak English or any other language. It touches and comforts my soul. It has never said anything or much less about "marriage and sex and abortion actually being murder are the things that immediately come to mind."

This is because scripture is supposed to inform how you live your life.
The quotes from Jesus, his lessons, do that for me.

>but eVolUtIoN and muh science!!!
Huh?

I have had unitarians to my face in person deny human sexual dimorphism to my face. I have also had unitarians deny the obvious genetic differences between human races saying it was all fake then completely contradict themselves and tell me I owed an eternal blood guilt because I am white. So yeah, I honestly don't care what creationists believe about the fossil record - at least that isn't collapsing my civilization.
As Jesus said,

And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye? Or how wilt thou say to thy brother, Let me pull out the mote out of thine eye; and, behold, a beam is in thine own eye?
Thou hypocrite, first cast out the beam out of thine own eye; and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy brother's eye.

Abortion has murdered far more people than any war you claim Christianity is responsible for.
Then take comfort that each and every one of their souls are in God's care:

Behold the fowls of the air: for they sow not, neither do they reap, nor gather into barns; yet your heavenly Father feedeth them. Are ye not much better than they?

>I only like Christians when they allow me to impose my views in the public school system without any pushback.
An objective study of religion is one of many subjects that should be taught in school. So I've ranged from Latter Day Saints through light study of Islam, Judaism, and Hindu. Ignorance should be avoided if one has the time and energy.

No. I am not complying with your self hatred. Move somewhere else and destroy them with your nonsense. You are literally telling me that I can't propagate my culture to the children of my society in the education system I am forced to pay for. I will not tolerate the equivalent of spiritual flat earth being taught to my children as if its anywhere equal to the words of the God of the universe and I will not tolerate some culture that is incompatible with mine to be taught as if were equal or better than my own culture either.
A perfect example of how your theology drives religious refugees into the doors of Unitarian churches. I've seen so many but often found the bad thinking habits of their families, after a while, leads them to wander off. Bad thinking habits are very hard to break.

Jesus says it to the thief on the cross. Please actually read scripture. People like you really tempt me to have a Jonah mindset.
Actually, that would be refreshing. Go to the Book and cite what Jesus said, like I did.

Bob Wilson
 
You've clearly explained your theology which reaffirms my Unitarian faith.
Faith? Faith in what exactly? Seems to be idolatry in your not impressive intellect. Not to mention the very obvious spite you have towards people like me because I expose you.

KISS (Keep It Simple Stupid) is an engineering principal that I apply in life. Occam's razor: "when competing explanations exist for the same phenomenon, the one with the fewest assumptions (the simplest) is usually the best to start with.
Everything is simple till its not! What if you application of KISS is entirely wrong and you don't actually know what you are talking about?

So yes, "incredibly shallow' is what following KISS may look like to those whose faith is a 'house of cards'..
Prove it. Prove that my faith is a house of cards. lol. This seems to be more like projection than anything.


It has never said anything or much less about "marriage and sex and abortion actually being murder are the things that immediately come to mind."
"I don't care about what Jesus said about marriage or if something I support counts as murder by Jesus's definition of murder"
This is why I do not believe you actually care about what Jesus says at all. If you actually wanted to follow Jesus's teachings, you would try to figure out how to actually live by Jesus's teachings. Christians have done this and have developed catechisms to help remind them of what the teachings are and you consider what they say legalistic.

Then take comfort that each and every one of their souls are in God's care:

Behold the fowls of the air: for they sow not, neither do they reap, nor gather into barns; yet your heavenly Father feedeth them. Are ye not much better than they?
"Its ok to murder babies because I think they go to heaven" ok wow. that is clearly not what God intends with this verse. Wildly out of context and you should realize this if Jesus's teachings are so easily understood to you.

I used to think that comic book villains were one directional and unrealistic. Then I met Unitarians!

An objective study of religion is one of many subjects that should be taught in school. So I've ranged from Latter Day Saints through light study of Islam, Judaism, and Hindu. Ignorance should be avoided if one has the time and energy.
Considering how poorly you've studied Christianity, I assume that anything you think about any other religion is wildly incorrect.

A perfect example of how your theology drives religious refugees into the doors of Unitarian churches. I've seen so many but often found the bad thinking habits of their families, after a while, leads them to wander off. Bad thinking habits are very hard to break.
Yeah, turns out heretics really don't actually like what Jesus has to say. These "refugees" you speak of are people who refuse to repent of obvious sin. Being vaguely "mean" or "impolite" is not a sin. You accuse Christians of being 'legalistic' or having 'bad thinking' but when presented with the question of "ok what does Jesus teach then" you crumble and have nothing of any real substance.

You act like you want to follow Jesus's teachings and you act like you think they are good, but you don't want children to learn about them in any serious capacity. Why? Because you don't believe it.

And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye? Or how wilt thou say to thy brother, Let me pull out the mote out of thine eye; and, behold, a beam is in thine own eye?Thou hypocrite, first cast out the beam out of thine own eye; and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy brother's eye.
This verse is not meant to be some cheap weapon to shut down legitimate criticism. This should be obvious if you actually understood Jesus's teachings.

You should read Luke 4 and Matthew 4 and reflect on how Satan uses scripture and how you use it. Its a bit similar. lol


Actually, that would be refreshing. Go to the Book and cite what Jesus said, like I did.
If you actually want me too, I will quite literally prove to you that what Paul says in the book of Romans is what Jesus is actually teaching. 99% of my "rude" behavior is trying to force you to think anyways.
 
Faith? Faith in what exactly? Seems to be idolatry in your not impressive intellect. Not to mention the very obvious spite you have towards people like me because I expose you.
Faith backed up by observation that following the teachings of Jesus makes our lives better. It brings us into the Kingdom of God.

Everything is simple till it's not! What if you application of KISS is entirely wrong and you don't actually know what you are talking about?
An engineering term brought about by observation and practice. Better designs have fewer parts and processes.

Prove it. Prove that my faith is a house of cards. lol. This seems to be more like projection than anything.
Your posting have accomplished it.

"I don't care about what Jesus said about marriage or if something I support counts as murder by Jesus's definition of murder"
This is why I do not believe you actually care about what Jesus says at all. If you actually wanted to follow Jesus's teachings, you would try to figure out how to actually live by Jesus's teachings. Christians have done this and have developed catechisms to help remind them of what the teachings are and you consider what they say legalistic.
Strange, I am a student of Jesus and follow his teaching every chance I get.

"It's ok to murder babies because I think they go to heaven" ok wow. that is clearly not what God intends with this verse. Wildly out of context and you should realize this if Jesus's teachings are so easily understood to you.
Reminds me of:


On a more serious note, some claim we must seek an eternal life in Heaven after death. It is the same, fervent belief of every suicide bomber and the 9/11 killers. It is what motivates the Russian commanders to send their people to their deaths. It was fed the Irish conflicts for centuries.

I used to think that comic book villains were one directional and unrealistic. Then I met Unitarians!
No problem from me. I forgive you.

Considering how poorly you've studied Christianity, I assume that anything you think about any other religion is wildly incorrect.
Is there a web page with an online quiz?

Yeah, turns out heretics really don't actually like what Jesus has to say. These "refugees" you speak of are people who refuse to repent of obvious sin. Being vaguely "mean" or "impolite" is not a sin. You accuse Christians of being 'legalistic' or having 'bad thinking' but when presented with the question of "ok what does Jesus teach then" you crumble and have nothing of any real substance.
Not every Christian as some are almost Unitarian in actions and teachings, Others, I'm glad they have Sunday services so they won't be out and about persecuting the poor and others.

You act like you want to follow Jesus's teachings and you act like you think they are good, but you don't want children to learn about them in any serious capacity. Why? Because you don't believe it.
Along with what the Latter Day Saints, Islam, and Hindu believe. I would even include Buddhusts beliefs and practices.

This verse is not meant to be some cheap weapon to shut down legitimate criticism. This should be obvious if you actually understood Jesus's teachings.
It was about 'hypocrisy' of trying to correct someone else when completely ignorant about what they are doing.

You should read Luke 4 and Matthew 4 and reflect on how Satan uses scripture and how you use it. Its a bit similar. lol
As do you. Was there anything in particular?

If you actually want me too, I will quite literally prove to you that what Paul says in the book of Romans is what Jesus is actually teaching. 99% of my "rude" behavior is trying to force you to think anyways.
We're having a fine chat. Each presenting their thoughts and options. Works for me.

Bob Wilson
 
Last edited:
I am reminded that Scott Adams "converted to Christianity as a recent Pascal wagerer.

I enjoy the irony of how many think they can "convert" in their last breath as payment for a life of sinful acts. This is not something this Unitarian is likely to do ... if I am consistent. Feel free to ask me post mortem.

Bob Wilson
 
Faith backed up by observation that following the teachings of Jesus makes our lives better. It brings us into the Kingdom of God.
Observing what? Certainly not the words Jesus says and all the surrounding context of them. lmao.

Jesus's teachings are not merely some self-help book.

Your posting have accomplished it.
1768959745691.webp




Well, your "kiss" principle ends up making claims or statements that are just flat out irrational.

Like this one:
On a more serious note, some claim we must seek an eternal life in Heaven after death. It is the same, fervent belief of every suicide bomber and the 9/11 killers. It is what motivates the Russian commanders to send their people to their deaths. It was fed the Irish conflicts for centuries.

What is this even supposed to prove? Rich comment coming from someone who's killed in a war before (I don't think that's inherently wrong, but your comment implies it) and who also thinks its absolutely necessary to let women murder their babies for personal material gain, but I'll answer it anyways.

  1. Christianity and Islam are both fundamentally different worldviews that make different truth claims and have different moral systems. Why even lump them together as if they are the same? Its intellectually dishonest and its illogical. All world religions make claims that make them mutually exclusive, so they can't all be true or even "partially true".

    If the Quran and the hadiths tell muslisms that they can get special favor or rewards for killing infidels (which it does) and a muslim does so, they are acting in accordance with the moral system of Islam. If Islam is true - ie its claims are actually true (lmao) - then it would mean the morality of the Islamic god would be the morality the universe is held under. If that were the case, then any moral critiques would be irrational. So any objection would just be stupid.

    Islam is not true for all sorts of reasons, but I don't care to get into it now. Christianity is true, so what does Jesus actually say regarding violence?

    Matthew 10:34–39

    Not Peace, but a Sword

    [34] “Do not think that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I have not come to bring peace, but a sword. [35] For I have come to set a man against his father, and a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law. [36] And a person’s enemies will be those of his own household. [37] Whoever loves father or mother more than me is not worthy of me, and whoever loves son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me. [38] And whoever does not take his cross and follow me is not worthy of me. [39] Whoever finds his life will lose it, and whoever loses his life for my sake will find it. (ESV)
    Matthew 24:6–8

    [6] And you will hear of wars and rumors of wars. See that you are not alarmed, for this must take place, but the end is not yet. [7] For nation will rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom, and there will be famines and earthquakes in various places. [8] All these are but the beginning of the birth pains. (ESV)

    Jesus here is saying that violent conflict is inevitable as the Gospel is spread across the world. This is because of the fall. Everyone has a fallen sinful nature - including Christians. Jesus is quite literally saying that Christians may experience persecution for what they believe - even from within their family. Families will be torn apart as people come to Christ or as people raised in Christian households reject Christ and split from their families (those 'refugees' you enable to live in unrepentant sin).

    Christians have fought just wars and they have fought unjust wars. It happens and its a fulfillment of what Jesus said would happen. There will be wars and rumors of war.

  2. Hypocrisy is a character flaw, not a logical flaw. If a man pulled out a gun and shot another man to death because he believed so strongly that the earth was round, would that invalidate the claim that the earth is round? No. Same goes here. Does Christianity claim that Christians cease to sin? No. Christianity has never claimed that Christians suddenly cease having a sinful nature after coming to Christ, but that God's just punishment for their sins is fulfilled on the cross.

Strange, I am a student of Jesus and follow his teaching every chance I get.
You claim this but flagrantly ignore many of Jesus's teachings. I don't mean imperfectly holding to them in your personal life and then repenting. I mean flat out ignoring them entirely because you don't believe they are relevant to you.

Examples:

Matthew 28:16–20

The Great Commission

[16] Now the eleven disciples went to Galilee, to the mountain to which Jesus had directed them. [17] And when they saw him they worshiped him, but some doubted. [18] And Jesus came and said to them, “All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me. [19] Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, [20] teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you. And behold, I am with you always, to the end of the age.” (ESV)

Jesus completely BTFOs your belief system with this single quote. Unitarianism and universalism destroyed. Jesus is quite literally telling the disciples to go make other people believers of the Triune Christian God. Not to be vaguely nice and selectively follow teachings you assume are not unique to Jesus because you ignore the context on why Jesus said what He said.



Matthew 19:1–12

Teaching About Divorce

[1] Now when Jesus had finished these sayings, he went away from Galilee and entered the region of Judea beyond the Jordan. [2] And large crowds followed him, and he healed them there.
[3] And Pharisees came up to him and tested him by asking, “Is it lawful to divorce one’s wife for any cause?” [4] He answered, “Have you not read that he who created them from the beginning made them male and female, [5] and said, ‘Therefore a man shall leave his father and his mother and hold fast to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh’? [6] So they are no longer two but one flesh. What therefore God has joined together, let not man separate.” [7] They said to him, “Why then did Moses command one to give a certificate of divorce and to send her away?” [8] He said to them, “Because of your hardness of heart Moses allowed you to divorce your wives, but from the beginning it was not so. [9] And I say to you: whoever divorces his wife, except for sexual immorality, and marries another, commits adultery.
[10] The disciples said to him, “If such is the case of a man with his wife, it is better not to marry.” [11] But he said to them, “Not everyone can receive this saying, but only those to whom it is given. [12] For there are eunuchs who have been so from birth, and there are eunuchs who have been made eunuchs by men, and there are eunuchs who have made themselves eunuchs for the sake of the kingdom of heaven. Let the one who is able to receive this receive it.” (ESV)

Jesus didn't have to define marriage to answer the pharisees, but he did. His answer is that marriage is between a man and a woman because God created marriage to be that way in Genesis. Jesus is not saying that marriage is a cultural construct here either - it is something established by God. Gay fake marriage not allowed here either. Not only this, Jesus completely destroys no fault divorce. No divorce because people aren't feeling it any more or any other similar nonsense. The exception that Jesus refers are eunuchs who are people who are lifelong celibates for various reasons. Your fake church has defied Jesus's teaching here and treats gay fake marriage as a super duper moral good and treats no-fault divorce like its a moral necessity to allow. It would be better to say that your fake church doesn't at all believe in both marriage and sexual morals as Jesus defines them. Deliberately telling people that they can commit sin and live in unrepentant sin...

Matthew 18:1–6

Who Is the Greatest?

[1] At that time the disciples came to Jesus, saying, “Who is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven?” [2] And calling to him a child, he put him in the midst of them [3] and said, “Truly, I say to you, unless you turn and become like children, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven. [4] Whoever humbles himself like this child is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven.
[5] “Whoever receives one such child in my name receives me, [6] but whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in me to sin, it would be better for him to have a great millstone fastened around his neck and to be drowned in the depth of the sea. (ESV)

Wow. Pretty damning thing to say about someone who deliberately teaches people to sin or teaches people that its ok to live in unrepentant sin, like your fake church does. Jesus is saying here that heretics can be punished - up to the point of execution. So yeah, kind of hard to bring about the Kingdom of God when you actively tell people they can live in unrepentant sin.



Matthew 5:17–20

Christ Came to Fulfill the Law

[17] “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. [18] For truly, I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not an iota, not a dot, will pass from the Law until all is accomplished. [19] Therefore whoever relaxes one of the least of these commandments and teaches others to do the same will be called least in the kingdom of heaven, but whoever does them and teaches them will be called great in the kingdom of heaven. [20] For I tell you, unless your righteousness exceeds that of the scribes and Pharisees, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven. (ESV)

Jesus is clearly saying that the Old Testament scripture is still relevant and that the law itself is not irrelevant and that the old testament is still scripture because Jesus treats it as so. I have yet to see where you actually believe that scripture is scripture or even if you believe anything is scripture. Kind of easy to "follow Jesus's teachings" when you disregard most of them.



Matthew 7:21–23

I Never Knew You

[21] “Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but the one who does the will of my Father who is in heaven. [22] On that day many will say to me, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and cast out demons in your name, and do many mighty works in your name?’ [23] And then will I declare to them, ‘I never knew you; depart from me, you workers of lawlessness.’ (ESV)

Two things here. It is possible for people to not enter the Kingdom of Heaven (the Kingdom of God) - eg if not heaven then they go to hell, which you don't believe in. The second part is that its possible to do works and not get into the Kingdom of Heaven. hmm. That is interesting. So works alone aren't enough? So clearly there is something else that gets someone into the Kingdom of God.



Also, the entire Gospel of John. lol. All of it. Not copying and pasting it all. It is exceedingly clear from Jesus's words in the Gospel of John.

Was there anything in particular?

Luke 4:1–13

The Temptation of Jesus

[1] And Jesus, full of the Holy Spirit, returned from the Jordan and was led by the Spirit in the wilderness [2] for forty days, being tempted by the devil. And he ate nothing during those days. And when they were ended, he was hungry. [3] The devil said to him, “If you are the Son of God, command this stone to become bread.” [4] And Jesus answered him, “It is written, ‘Man shall not live by bread alone.’” [5] And the devil took him up and showed him all the kingdoms of the world in a moment of time, [6] and said to him, “To you I will give all this authority and their glory, for it has been delivered to me, and I give it to whom I will. [7] If you, then, will worship me, it will all be yours.” [8] And Jesus answered him, “It is written,

“‘You shall worship the Lord your God,
and him only shall you serve.’”



[9] And he took him to Jerusalem and set him on the pinnacle of the temple and said to him, “If you are the Son of God, throw yourself down from here, [10] for it is written,

“‘He will command his angels concerning you,
to guard you,’


[11] and

“‘On their hands they will bear you up,
lest you strike your foot against a stone.’”


[12] And Jesus answered him, “It is said, ‘You shall not put the Lord your God to the test.’” [13] And when the devil had ended every temptation, he departed from him until an opportune time. (ESV)
Matthew 4:1–11

The Temptation of Jesus

[1] Then Jesus was led up by the Spirit into the wilderness to be tempted by the devil. [2] And after fasting forty days and forty nights, he was hungry. [3] And the tempter came and said to him, “If you are the Son of God, command these stones to become loaves of bread.” [4] But he answered, “It is written,

“‘Man shall not live by bread alone,
but by every word that comes from the mouth of God.’”


[5] Then the devil took him to the holy city and set him on the pinnacle of the temple [6] and said to him, “If you are the Son of God, throw yourself down, for it is written,

“‘He will command his angels concerning you,’


and

“‘On their hands they will bear you up,
lest you strike your foot against a stone.’”


[7] Jesus said to him, “Again it is written, ‘You shall not put the Lord your God to the test.’” [8] Again, the devil took him to a very high mountain and showed him all the kingdoms of the world and their glory. [9] And he said to him, “All these I will give you, if you will fall down and worship me.” [10] Then Jesus said to him, “Be gone, Satan! For it is written,

“‘You shall worship the Lord your God
and him only shall you serve.’”



[11] Then the devil left him, and behold, angels came and were ministering to him. (ESV)

Note the text in bold. What satan is offering Jesus is dominion over the earth to establish His kingdom if Jesus were to bow down and worship satan. Jesus's response is no because this can ONLY be done under the name of the Triune God. The Kingdom of God cannot be established under the name of any false deity. Not allah, not krishna, not oden, not zeus. Only the Christian God. Even if someone tries to warp this scripture into saying that satan was offering Jesus material stuff, it still doesn't change the point that Jesus is clearly saying that worshiping pagan gods is wrong. You don't believe this. You truly believe that the Kingdom of God can be brought about by rejecting the Triune God and doing vague ' good works'.

Which is why comments like this:
Along with what the Latter Day Saints, Islam, and Hindu believe. I would even include Buddhusts beliefs and practices.
Really kind of prove that you don't get it. God's law is not in these other texts. Jesus's teachings are not in these other texts. That's not how it works and it doesn't make sense to do this.


It was about 'hypocrisy' of trying to correct someone else when completely ignorant about what they are doing.
This in no way shape or form is what you are doing. I am a hypocrite. Ok so what? I can't point out what is sinful in scripture now? I am no longer qualified to say what is right or wrong in God's law anymore? Please.

What did I do wrong then? crickets. no verse nothing. Just "You say X is wrong? Well you are a HYPOCRITE so i don't have to listen to you." Yeah real productive for understanding anything.
No problem from me. I forgive you.
>I forgive you
>>for what?
>telling the truth.
k

Not every Christian as some are almost Unitarian in actions and teachings, Others, I'm glad they have Sunday services so they won't be out and about persecuting the poor and others.
I am under no obligation to support a massively corrupt bureaucratic welfare system that never brings the Gospel to people and enables mass unrepentant sin. There is no love in that.

I will also not support a mass wealth transfer from my people to foreigners either. I will not trade my inheritance for a meal. There was a man in the Bible who did that and God was uh not very pleased with that decision. lol



Is there a web page with an online quiz?
Use words. You are retired and have no job.

I enjoy the irony of how many think they can "convert" in their last breath as payment for a life of sinful acts
This is quite literally what happened with the thief on the cross. Whether or not Scott Adam's conversion was legitimate or not I won't know because I can't read his heart. The Gospel is offensive to the world. Nobody deserves salvation, yet God saves who He does through mercy by Christ's death and resurrection. It is what it is.

Luke 23:39–43

[39] One of the criminals who were hanged railed at him, saying, “Are you not the Christ? Save yourself and us!” [40] But the other rebuked him, saying, “Do you not fear God, since you are under the same sentence of condemnation? [41] And we indeed justly, for we are receiving the due reward of our deeds; but this man has done nothing wrong.” [42] And he said, “Jesus, remember me when you come into your kingdom.” [43] And he said to him, “Truly, I say to you, today you will be with me in paradise.” (ESV)
One criminal's statement to Jesus hearkens back to the same temptation that satan presented to Jesus. The thief turns to the man and rebukes him because the punishment for their crimes was fully justified. He then turned to Jesus and asks for Jesus to remember him. The thief understood who Christ is. Jesus heard the thief's plea and Jesus Himself said that the thief was saved. Quite literally a deathbed conversion.

Justification through faith. Faith produces works. Works sustain faith. Works done out of love for the Triune God and for the Glory of the Triune God. Sola fide, Sola gratia, Sola Christo, soli Deo gloria


John 20:24–29

Jesus and Thomas

[24] Now Thomas, one of the twelve, called the Twin, was not with them when Jesus came. [25] So the other disciples told him, “We have seen the Lord.” But he said to them, “Unless I see in his hands the mark of the nails, and place my finger into the mark of the nails, and place my hand into his side, I will never believe.”

[26] Eight days later, his disciples were inside again, and Thomas was with them. Although the doors were locked, Jesus came and stood among them and said, “Peace be with you.” [27] Then he said to Thomas, “Put your finger here, and see my hands; and put out your hand, and place it in my side. Do not disbelieve, but believe.” [28] Thomas answered him, “My Lord and my God!” [29] Jesus said to him, “Have you believed because you have seen me? Blessed are those who have not seen and yet have believed.” (ESV)
Don't be consistent with fake unitarianism. Stop doubting and believe. lol
 
Last edited:
I appreciate the time you spent confirming my low opinion of “Christianity.” It confirms my Unitarian beliefs in the teachings of Jesus while your efforts demonstrate the legalisms, the rationalisms that alienate the spiritual, walking wounded who show up at our Unitarian-Universalism doors.

A week ago, Thursday Jan 15 was the birthday of Dr Martin Luthier King, a minister admired by Unitarians for helping to lead our country away from “Jim Crow.” His is a shining example that some trinitarians can practice what Jesus taught us.

It is the ‘house of cards’ theology that adulterates what Jesus and others taught to make stiff necked, legalism that pester our world. A theology that too easily swings the sword instead of healing the severed ear.

Bob Wilson
 
I appreciate the time you spent confirming my low opinion of “Christianity.” It confirms my Unitarian beliefs in the teachings of Jesus while your efforts demonstrate the legalisms, the rationalisms that alienate the spiritual, walking wounded who show up at our Unitarian-Universalism doors.
If anything, I have demonstrated how what you believe is intellectually, morally, and spiritually bankrupt. You claim to want to follow Jesus's teachings then claim that Jesus's own words are 'legalistic'. Your "following the teachings" is just ignoring when Jesus says something you don't like then telling people to do whatever makes them 'feel good' regardless if its actually sinful or not. No repentance either. What are the teachings of Jesus according to you? Cherry picking whatever you want at any given moment is what you believe in and you have already admitted it here.

A week ago, Thursday Jan 15 was the birthday of Dr Martin Luthier King, a minister admired by Unitarians for helping to lead our country away from “Jim Crow.” His is a shining example that some trinitarians can practice what Jesus taught us.
Oh? You mean the civil rights act that nobody wanted that you imposed on the country with the military? Eg a set of legalisms imposed by the sword? Where now what you 'teach' - really seek to impose - is that liking white people and believing that there should be a future for white people is now immoral? Now I've seen progressives like you pushing for "minority only spaces" in colleges, etc. i even see progressives talk about white people in terms they consider to be genoc1dal. Give me a break, you progressives are worse than hypocrites. If anything, you have proven the segregationists correct.

It is the ‘house of cards’ theology that adulterates what Jesus and others taught to make stiff necked, legalism that pester our world. A theology that too easily swings the sword instead of healing the severed ear.
Prove it. By what standard am I wrong? This is the issue. You assert this but have nothing to back it up with. You believe that the apostles who witnessed the earthly ministry of Jesus are wrong about Jesus's teachings. You believe that the entire early church was wrong. Where is your proof? That some Christians were mean and that some imposed rules with violence? Well you all did that when you imposed the civil wrongs act, so that renders everything you say worthless by your own metric. If anything, you've severed your own ear and refuse to listen.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top