I beg to disagree - in part.
1. I remember when every car manufacturer, bar BMW and other 'sporty' cars, moved from real wheel drive to front wheel drive. This move saved weight, reduced fuel consumption and enhanced some driving characteristics, like handling in snow. Ergo having the drive wheels under the weight of the engine made sense. You can spin a Kona's rear in the snow if you want to but you have to 'work at it'.
2a. Efficiency. Even today, four years after introduction, the Kona's 15kWh/100km power consumption stands with the best, including some of the Tesla models.
2b. Ordinary people, like myself, are OK with 0-100 km/h acceleration of 7.6 sec. This car was not designed for the race track. Still, the initial high torque of the electric motor will push you back into your seat
gently 
if you want it - granted not like a Tesla. But the car is much easier on the budget
and on tires!

2c. As for the 167km/h top speed. Last time I checked, unless you are driving in Germany on the Autobahn, it is more than plenty to get you a fat speeding ticket. Here in Ontario it is good enough to get your car and you grounded on the spot with heavy fines. Mind you, you will be written about in the papers.
With due respect to all guys and gals who are really in racing and performance cars either as a way to earn living or just as a hobby. I am fine with that. But I am puzzled how average folks can get exited over a fraction of a second difference in acceleration between cars/models they can not afford.
I just got some beer driving the Kona to the Beer Store. "Sparky" took me there and brought me home even in the rather cool -20C weather.