I:ve been following this thread too, and greatly appreciatimg all the disassembly pictures as a
good reference. Sometimes it"s hard to determine exactly what is holding a given piece of
trim on, and still avoid simply pulling harder and breaking something. Careful pre-bending and
a good flashlight helps. I have a couple of flat plastic tools whose original intent is unclear --
smoothing down tape, perhaps, or mar-free scraping? Anyway, those work well for a gentle pry.
But I hadn:t really thought about the sound angle at all, until today when I realized that there
is one distinct characteristic that I've sort of always subconsciously noticed, but dismissed
as normal. I still will dismiss it since I run with windows open and it totally doesn't matter,
but now I can quantify it. There seems to be a whole-body resonance peak right around 220
Hz, or an octave down from concert A minus a smidge, and I can hum along with it to really
bring it "out of the mix". It is completely independent of speed, so it's not tires.
Since I have the rear seat cushion out but the seatbacks up at the moment, perhaps more of
it was coming through/from that body panel with the service-plug access. Anyway, I went back
through the thread a bit to see if any *spectral* analysis had been done. EVPower, was there
any particular phase of installation that gave a really significant drop? That might point to the
resonant bits. I suppose I could crawl around knocking on pieces of body and see if I detect
that same overtone ... it's clear that as soon as motion begns at all, some part is reliably getting
stimulated and responding the only way it can.
Do those glued-on pads of stuff simply try to damp that sort of thing? Does exact position and
angle matter to their effectiveness? I would think there are some pretty complex vibration
nodes going on.
_H*
Hi EVPower,
I'm just wondering how much weight has been added to the car and has it made any significant difference to the overall range?
Sorry, just for fun I had to do the math. Using the data from tire rack re: "a 50-pound spare tire, wheel, jack and tools can reduces the vehicle's fuel economy by up to 1%.I eat less to compensated the weight
Seriously, here is what I actually bought from amazon to do the car :
5 x Noico Adhesive Closed Cell Deadening (700 g)
https://www.amazon.ca/gp/product/B07TKXCN6F/ref=ppx_od_dt_b_asin_title_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1
1 X Noico car Sound deadening mat (11.7 kg)
https://www.amazon.ca/gp/product/B00URUIKAK/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_asin_title_o04_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1
So, total weight added : 15.2 kg.
The range shouldn't be that much affected. Keep in mind that the close foam should be able to reduce heat/cold consumption. Didn't find some hard true on it but seem very possible.
Given all the variables that affect mileage, use cases of the vehicle, the inherit limitations and inaccuracies of the EPA methods, and so on. These sorts of estimates are what we, ironically, call "noise".Sorry, just for fun I had to do the math. Using the data from tire rack re: "a 50-pound spare tire, wheel, jack and tools can reduces the vehicle's fuel economy by up to 1%.
So we can figure 0.5% loss for ~30 lbs (15kg) which would translate to approximately 1.3 miles range loss assuming an available max EPA range
So, I only need to lose another 8kg and it's covered. My gym instructor will be delighted...I eat less to compensated the weight
Seriously, here is what I actually bought from amazon to do the car :
5 x Noico Adhesive Closed Cell Deadening (700 g)
https://www.amazon.ca/gp/product/B07TKXCN6F/ref=ppx_od_dt_b_asin_title_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1
1 X Noico car Sound deadening mat (11.7 kg)
https://www.amazon.ca/gp/product/B00URUIKAK/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_asin_title_o04_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1
So, total weight added : 15.2 kg.
The range shouldn't be that much affected. Keep in mind that the close foam should be able to reduce heat/cold consumption. Didn't find some hard true on it but seem very possible.
Sorry for the delay, busy with kids and vacation is soon.
Hi hobbit, you are more knowledgeable from the sound perspective than me. So the db test was more easy for me but doesn't paint the true picture. I didn't make any spectral analysis because i didn't know what frequency I needed to check. If you help me out, I can test it out. But now that my car is almost done with all sound deadeding and foam cell, I don't think I would find your resonance.
Sound deadening mat is self-adhesive https://www.amazon.ca/Noico-deadeni...pd_rd_i=B01KZ5X7KO&psc=1&ref_=pd_bap_d_rp_1_t and the job is to reduce the resonance. You cut what ever you want. From many reads on the internet and video of installation, you need 25% coverage. The ROI from doing more, isn't worth it.
check this video :
Afterward, the https://www.amazon.ca/Noico-Insulat...pd_rd_i=B07TKXCN6F&psc=1&ref_=pd_bap_d_rp_3_i
Closed Cell Deadening is self-adhesive and cut down the noise (frequency of sound or something like that). You need 100% coverage. You install it on top of the sound deadening mat
The trunk, where should be a tire replacement, is the 1st place to start and greatly lower the sound of my car. After was wheels arch.
If something isn't clear, reply to me.
They have been adding some new pavement in places, real dark stuff, and I noticed how quiet the Kona is on this stuff, even at higher speeds. So it confirms to me that it is mostly road noise, not wind noise.
I can see easily see doing the rear wheel trunk, but not sure about the arches. Are you talking about the rear wheel ones or front ones?
So, on the arches, you removed them from the exterior and added the same Noico to the inside? And they still fit OK after that? And that made a big diff to the front noise?
I might try the spare wheel well trunk, since it is easy to do. I have some Noico.
On another car forum for my other car (not Hyundai) someone added Noico to the interior of the rear wheel panel arhes, and said it made a big diff. But that car is still a lot better than my Kona without doing anything. I didn't open up rear panels in the Kona, but suspect there is no noise insulation in there.
Would I get a bigger bang for the buck to use my Noico (80mil) on the arch wheel wells vs the spare tire trunk?
I've only got 18 sq ft of the stuff, so want to use it where I get the best results. I am a little loathe in tearing apart the inside of my car, as I don't want to screw anything up.From the metric, do the spare tire trunk first, then the arch wheel wells.
Considering that, with that https://www.amazon.ca/gp/product/B00URUIKAK/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_asin_title_o04_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1, I almost cover the parts needed for the job : trunk, front wheel arch and 2 doors and front and rear under seats.
Once you start this project, I think you will want to cover all area as possible![]()
I've only got 18 sq ft of the stuff, so want to use it where I get the best results. I am a little loathe in tearing apart the inside of my car, as I don't want to screw anything up.
I might also wait until my battery is replaced (just in case they don't) to be sure I will be keeping this car for a long time. I am pretty happy with it, other than that road noise at higher speeds.