It strikes me that there must have been some confusion or inconsistency in the manufacturing process and they didn't initially know when the extra insulation was added. It's odd that no other territory has admitted to checking for the insulation. Perhaps this is what some people in other countries are ACTUALLY getting checked when they are being told that they are getting a "preliminary check" before the decision is made about getting the battery replacement...or not. There must be a grey area in the manufacturing dates (which they finally figured out) where batteries maybe had the fix but maybe didn't. It kind if makes sense. And we only (maybe) know about it because Hyundai Down Under is more communicative and "honest" than other regions. I'm just guessing, of course, but I feel pretty confident about it.I have to wonder why this step can't be done in advance of taking the car in for a potential battery replacement.
Surely emailing a photo of the barcode would be sufficient?
View attachment 13625
Ya, I'm thinking the "test" is as simple as running the barcode against a list and cross referencing between Yay, Nay and "better safe than sorry".You would think in this day and age every component assembled in a car would have been recorded via barcodes into a database that Hyundai maintains but perhaps not the internals of the outsourced battery assembly from Green Power. So, perhaps Green Power has now provided the production data that allows more clarity around what battery serial numbers might be affected. I can't imagine any externally-applied electrical test or BMS readable parameter that would reveal the info required, certainly not cell voltage balance.
I have no doubt that corporate lawyers discourage importers from providing any detailed explanations in general but certainly here in NZ the likelihood of that being turned against them is very low. And it's unlikely that my own car made in Sept 2018 would not be affected but the letter has to cover all cars present here made before March 2020.
Hi, its all a bit odd. After complaining to H customer care a month ago, they came to the party and replaced my battery on Friday just gone. No test or scan required. A friend on mine was there that morning to have his scan/test done. He ask the service girl why he had to have a test first when i didnt. Her reply was a bit vague, something along the lines of 'the mechanic must have done the check another way', what ever that means. She also said that here in Sth aust, every car they had checked, all needed replacement so far.Then that's not a test, it's a lookup. Which could certainly be done via email, and without holding
owners' cars hostage for months. What utter BS. People with functional cars held at dealerships
should go demand *their property* back, until such time as replacement is on-site and ready.
_H*
Very interesting article. Thanks for posting.An article in the Aussie media about recycling that has useful info for us.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-10-25/electric-car-solar-battery-storage-waste-recycling/100564234
I followed your earlier advice and emailed Hyundai Oz.Hi, its all a bit odd. After complaining to H customer care a month ago, they came to the party and replaced my battery on Friday just gone.
Mine was 07/19 build.
Ok, I translated all of the German. I'm beginning to think that this is the same BMS change they made earlier - the one that caused the charging to pause at 80% and again at 90%. I'll recheck my paperwork, but I think it's already done.That campaign number has been raised on a German forum but they don't see to know what it is either.
The battery replacement campaign is 11D043.
Ok, I translated all of the German. I'm beginning to think that this is the same BMS change they made earlier - the one that caused the charging to pause at 80% and again at 90%. I'll recheck my paperwork, but I think it's already done.
The fact that "BMS" is specified makes it sound like yet another software issue/check.I followed your earlier advice and emailed Hyundai Oz.
After months of silence, suddenly, they'd like to see the car at the dealer's place on Monday morning.
I'm not sure it's for a battery replacement though. The recall is listed as:
OS EV 2nd BMS IMPROVEMENT 10D042
Was that the code for replacement?
I agree.The fact that "BMS" is specified makes it sound like yet another software issue/check.
I booked mine in for last week. They did the 30k service and were meant to do the BMS update D042. Didn’t happen. Dealer said it had been “pulled” because “it wasn’t ready”.Any updates on this BMS campaign? Recently had it updated during a service. Main thing I notice is that it takes longer to charge. Unconfirmed, as still need to fully reference, but it still appears to use the same amount of kWhs but shows a lesser percentage on the battery read-out e.g. 35kWhs would now charge to 45% rather than previously 50% (percentages used for illustrative purposes only).
Many owners have similar stories and there's seems nothing out of place with yours. You're already further ahead in the process than many of us who are still waiting for the dealer to contact us to record the battery information. Best to stay patient and let them do their work.Any relevant information or advice would be appreciated.