Denise C
Active Member
Let me know if you have any issues getting it running. I need beta testers!
So far so good! Thanks for creating the shortcut and saving data into notes
Sent from my iPhone using Inside EVs
Let me know if you have any issues getting it running. I need beta testers!
So far so good! Thanks for creating the shortcut and saving data into notes
Sent from my iPhone using Inside EVs
Here are my two trips from yesterday, with a mid-day charge up to 74% SoC:
***********************************
Jan 28, 2022 at 12:49 *** Driven: 41.2 Mi *** Mi / kWh: 3.48 *** Range Left: 59.34 Mi *** Total Range: 100.54 Mi
***********************************
Jan 28, 2022 at 17:34 *** Driven: 42.6 Mi *** Mi / kWh: 3.78 *** Range Left: 38.23 Mi *** Total Range: 80.83 Mi
Looks like the new EV Range is working great, I ended up with about 38% SoC when I got home. thanks @GvilleGuy!
(Although looking at the numbers I'm curious why the second leg was more efficient but had lower total range...)
Thanks for letting me know! That IOS note format lends itself well to pasting into the forum!
Is the range for the second leg from the 74% SoC? So while more efficient you didn’t exceed the 100 mile calculated range of the first leg. If the second leg had the same efficiency, then the calculated range would have been 74 miles.Here are my two trips from yesterday, with a mid-day charge up to 74% SoC:
***********************************
Jan 28, 2022 at 12:49 *** Driven: 41.2 Mi *** Mi / kWh: 3.48 *** Range Left: 59.34 Mi *** Total Range: 100.54 Mi
***********************************
Jan 28, 2022 at 17:34 *** Driven: 42.6 Mi *** Mi / kWh: 3.78 *** Range Left: 38.23 Mi *** Total Range: 80.83 Mi
Looks like the new EV Range is working great, I ended up with about 38% SoC when I got home. thanks @GvilleGuy!
(Although looking at the numbers I'm curious why the second leg was more efficient but had lower total range...)
Yes, but shouldn't the total range actually go up with a higher efficiency? Total range should be battery capacity * mi/kWh, right? The actual SoC for beginning/end would affect mi/kWh, but I wouldn't think it would change the total range calculation. Unless I'm missing something.Is the range for the second leg from the 74% SoC? So while more efficient you didn’t exceed the 100 mile calculated range of the first leg.
Looking good! Thanks!
***********************************
Jan 31, 2022 at 17:57 ** Driven: 83.9 Mi ** Start-Batt: 100% ** End-Batt: 26% ** Mi / kWh: 3.92 ** Range Left: 29.45 Mi ** Total Range (From 100% charge): 113.35 Mi ** Total Range (From 100% charge): 113.288 Mi
I am learning more about Shortcuts every day from working on this - I will probably add an "if then" statement and suppress displaying the 'extra' total range line when start-batt is 100%.
Thanks for the updated shortcut. I updated my version to capture weather data as well with hope that it would help in the long run to see how weather affects the range.
Here's my real run today with a mid-day charge. Considering the change in efficiency I like what it shows.
***********************************
Feb 2, 2022 at 12:40 ** Driven: 46.3 Mi ** Start-Batt: 100% ** End-Batt: 48% ** Mi / kWh: 3.08 ** Range Left: 42.73 Mi ** Total Range (From 100% charge): 89.03 Mi ** Total Range (From 100% charge): 89.012 Mi
***********************************
Feb 2, 2022 at 18:34 ** Driven: 39.2 Mi ** Start-Batt: 62% ** End-Batt: 15% ** Mi / kWh: 2.89 ** Range Left: 12.53 Mi ** Total Range (From 62% charge): 51.73 Mi ** Total Range (From 100% charge): 83.521 Mi
Driven: 85 Mi
Start-Batt: 100%
End-Batt: 44%
Mi
/kWh: 5.25
Total Range (From 100% charge): 151.76 Mi
Total Range (From 100% charge): 151.725 Mi
ESTIMATED RANGE REMAINING: 66.76 Mi
I’m pretty impressed with these numbers especially since it involved driving from 5,000ft elevation to 8,500ft and back.
Thanks for the shortcut. Out of curiosity, why do you have the input as a decimal vs adding a divide by 100 step in the calculation?