I will consider disconnecting the detection switch within the hatch assembly this summer as to avoid this from occurring.My wife inadvertently forgot to double check closing the rear hatch yesterday afternoon and, when I checked the BM2 this morning, sure enough the normal recharge heartbeat had been suspended.
Every four (+/-) hours was the battery drain event without the overlying recharge event.
Closing the hatch this morning returned the recharge heartbeat back on.
So, with the latest software updates, the battery tender software still gets fouled up with an improperly closed rear hatch.
If a procedure exists, I will consider itI will consider disconnecting the detection switch within the hatch assembly this summer as to avoid this from occurring.![]()
Yes, that thought had occurred to me as well but I suspect it would harder than it seems because of the control logic still needed between the switch and the electric latch actuator.I will consider disconnecting the detection switch within the hatch assembly this summer as to avoid this from occurring.![]()
Can you post the BM-2 graph of all that?... Every four (+/-) hours was the battery drain event without the overlying recharge event.
If it works the same as the front hood and only sends a signal that it is open(shows on the dash) than it should be no problem as I have already disconnected the front one (temporarily to see the results), the only issue being the alarm goes off if opening it when vehicle not in run mode.Yes, that thought had occurred to me as well but I suspect it would harder than it seems because of the control logic still needed between the switch and the electric latch actuator.
Can you post the BM-2 graph of all that?
Yes, that thought had occurred to me as well but I suspect it would harder than it seems because of the control logic still needed between the switch and the electric latch actuator.
Can you post the BM-2 graph of all that?
It's interesting that after 19 hours of tailgate ajar the battery is not badly depleted at 12.5 V and did not continue to deteriorate. And, that a single aux charge event was enough to restore the voltage to better than it was before....In screen shot two (above), the normal "parade pattern" returns after I discovered and correctly closed the tailgate at 0545.
That tailgate switch initiates more than interrupting the 12V battery charging. I once set off on a short trip with the tailgate not completely shut (the red open indicator was showing). Soon (after about 100 metres) an intermittent alarm sounded but I decided since it was a short journey just to carry on. However in about 1 km I stopped at a pedestrian crossing and the car would not move again. So out I got and shut the tailgate and was able to get going again.It's interesting that after 19 hours of tailgate ajar the battery is not badly depleted at 12.5 V and did not continue to deteriorate. And, that a single aux charge event was enough to restore the voltage to better than it was before.
R32 (Tailgate open switch pin 3 and 4) is the one I am thinking and the wiring diagram confirmation is appreciated. R36 not sure of (maybe signals as John Lumsden above post) At least the wiring color code should help.This might help, EE. It's fooling the IPS Control Module firmware that's the concern.
But experimentation with the two switch conditions might lead to a suitable solution.
View attachment 12020
BINGO!3. Because I don't have this feature, I don't know how the telematics affects 12V drain and if it can disable periodic 12V charging.
Mine died after 1 hung LTE command (Bluelink), I assume it tried to complete whatever task until the 12V battery gave it the boot finally after settling down to a dismal 4.6 V:Does it make sense that waking the car up about 100 times is enough to pull the battery down from 12.6v to 12.0v
Well, yes.Does it make sense that waking the car up about 100 times is enough to pull the battery down from 12.6v to 12.0v, even with the charging algorithm sulking?