Say my used accord of 16k becomes 10k by 2025. And my new Clarity, drops to 15k approx. by 2025.
Using this hypothetical situation, you’re down $2000.
Although the new car lost its value more, but I end up paying only 8k(price drop from ~23k Considering the tax incentives) for the Clarity and 6k for the Accord after 5 years of owning + maintenance.
I’ll be impressed if you can get a base model for a net cost of $23K, but let’s go with that figure.
In this case, doesn’t the tax credits cover for the significant drop of new car?
You’ve already factored in the tax credits, and then some dealer discounts to get the net cost down to $23K. The base model is ~$34K.
What is the best metric? Isn’t it the cost of ownership rather than value of the car itself? Am I missing any point here.?
The cost to own the $16K used Accord for 5 years, using your numbers will be $6000 in depreciation plus interest on a loan and some maintenance. A $16K loan for 5 years at 3.9% will have a payment of ~$290/mo and interest of ~$1600.
The cost to own a new Clarity for five years, using your numbers will be $8000 in depreciation plus interest on a loan and some maintenance. A $23K loan for 5 years at 3.9% will have a payment of ~$420/mo and interest of ~$2400. This assumes a ~$9000 down payment on a negotiated OTD price of $32K (Federal credit and state rebate) which will need to be returned to your bank account, bi-weekly or monthly, via addition net income from a W-4 modification or after a large tax return and receipt of the state rebate.
The new car will have monthly payments that are $130 higher than the used car for 60 months. It will also be likely to have higher insurance premiums and possibly higher license and registration fees.
This brings the total to:
$2000 in depreciation
$6800 in higher monthly payments
$800 in addition interest, or,
$9600 plus any additional amounts for higher insurance, etc.
It could be all wrong, but that’s the metric I’d use and it puts you ~$10K in the hole compared to the used option.