You guys keep conflating the neeed for humans to stop with recharging opportunities. Having a much longer range just gives you so many more options. You can do quick human stops at the roadside rest areas multiple times in a long range vehicle without wasting time to refuel or charge. It also gives you many more options when it comes to choosing where and when to stop for fuel. And for the record again, I can go like that for 550 miles in my current ICE vehicle. Not 300, or ever the more realistic EV range of 200. Or I can stop earlier if I want to for some reason. I am not locked in to mandatory food/fuel/rest room stops on the battery's schedule every 200 miles or so... or sooner if the chargers aren't spaced out optimally. For me, that would be one slooow and frustrating road trip. IOW, a 500 mile nominal range, 400 mile actual range EV would be a FAR more useful road trip machine than a 300 mile nominal, 200 actual mile range EV.
But I do get the point that if you use the vehicle mostly for local driving, then paying a lot extra $ for that capacity would be foolish. For my usage EVs will not be very good fit for now. If we eventually get larger cheaper and hopefully lighter batteries, that may change.
But I do get the point that if you use the vehicle mostly for local driving, then paying a lot extra $ for that capacity would be foolish. For my usage EVs will not be very good fit for now. If we eventually get larger cheaper and hopefully lighter batteries, that may change.
When 300 miles is spoken of as not enough, it is just getting silly. Virtually every ICE vehicle would need to stop at this distance, virtually every human has to stop at this distance, so all you are talking about is how long that stop is..
Last edited: