Sponsored media is finally being directly disintermediated with Twitter. Now the so-called Tesla Investors (saboteurs- presumably Black Rock, ISS, MSNBC et. al.) that want to burn the first amendment because its harming bribery and corporate vandalism and financial vandalism have decided to sue Tesla in the name of defending bribery based sponsored media against Twitter and Tesla's trend setting effective use of political speech and advocacy. They are now joining the SEC in the action they instigated with the SEC against Tesla's use of Twitter.
This is one of the biggest assaults on free and useful political speech in American history and I think we will see the SEC can't allow the original claim to looked at or seriously revisited it can't have any transparency. Not surprised at all if it starts spouting about bs national security claims which would get to the heart of where we're going with this which is government is not entitled to any kind of secrecy as state secrecy is not only antithetical to privacy but also to to free speech and just and functional government and further expediency claims cannot be used to stop due process. Hoping Wikileaks comes through for what is coming. We have to find a way to make all forms of government secrecy impractical.
Part of what is happening is sponsored media and its speech enclosure of the US consists of 6 companies that try to determine everything that the American public is allowed to know based on highest bidder payments from big corporations or cartels or foreign entities and countries and this is known as sponsorship covered by the notion that the actual purpose is product sales. It is not, its actual purpose is to productize the citizenry and strip the citizenry of its power.
When Tesla succeeds in communicating directly with the public via Twitter that sponsorship is cut out of the loop, it can't pre-spin stuff and it is in a reactive position looking properly stupid facing anger and blow back from its sponsor bribers. When Tesla succeeds without paying for access to the artificially enclosed public mindshare the whole sponsored media franchise of lies is at stake and they complain bitterly about social media and claim it is being manipulated in a vanta black pot calling a kettle black kind of way- but for instance just look at the number of dual citizenships in the higher ranks of these media conglomerates and look at where their focus is, its on the Mid East not the US- even their personnel is sponsored in this captured media that leads to captured government.
So once again when they are allowed to do what they want they profit from highest bidder political candidate filtering as a way of silencing the public before the voting ever begins- think of it as media gerrymandering, but again they also engage in highest bidder censorship and spin beyond that and with twitter that whole system is getting bypassed so they for instance try to gag through a corrupt agency like the SEC any precedent setting user of free speech e.g. Tesla from using its CEO to spread material news through Twitter. Think of how utterly stupid the SEC's demand is on its surface and very likely in its depth over and over its about not being able to communicate material info by Twitter. Ask why the venue matters and the reasons the SEC provides don't seem remotely good enough. Their problem with Twitter is its missing the sponsor filter and surely they were angling given their obvious bias or the bias of the people puppeting the SEC for shill to filter Musk, you could even see it in the shill media interview Leslie Stahl did with Musk where she was giddy with the idea that Musk would be gagged and censored. And look at where this leads would we rather have our government captured or made into a puppet for a Mid East state or Russia or Exxon, or Monsanto or AG Farben or Halliburton or Black Water or Wackenhut or the British East India Company or the Queen? We don't want sell out traitorous intermediaries manufacturing highest bidder law and its coercive culture.
But with regard to Twitter being a material platform, public entities generally do a speculative budget which they publish as guidance and then they do final budgets which they also publish do you see the difference here and in both cases its done electronically? And then look again at how inaccurate the sponsored media coverage is of this stuff and even the SEC's own claims at face value appear to be in-accurate. The SEC never proved fraud about anything and shouldn't be given the benefit of the doubt on that but media pitches it as if they did. SEC also tried this stupid contractual arrangement which was supposed to be above question and challenge as if this were an act of leniency instead of taking advantage of the public and of Tesla shareholders and of Musk. Our system curtails speech in many ways most importantly in order to protect political speech but this stuff appears to be the opposite of protecting vital political speech, it is an arbitrary gag order. A former member of the SEC board said the original decision was bad and apparently there is a whole community that considers it unbelievably bad. Is a Herodian SEC attempting to create martyrs? What is the logic?
So again if a company like Tesla is successful then we see the speech enclosure and the artificial scarcity of the whole sponsor filter mechanism can be bypassed and the whole rent seeking narrative is bypassed meaning they can't do things like make people work more hours to increase control and keep them down. So Twitter bypasses and they don't get to do their little exclusive stories, they are put in the back where they belong because we need real media reconstruction- we need media rid of the conflicts of interest down to its very charter- they act like only these corporations have speech and everyone has to be filtered by them and has to bribe and pay them off to communicate- they are suppressing citizen speech and claim immunity for doing so, but also claim the right to lie to the public for money and even mislead the public about matters of public health like climate change. So we have a media based on a extreme conflict of interest. This is why Wikileaks is the most valid and viable media or medium out there.
This is one of the biggest assaults on free and useful political speech in American history and I think we will see the SEC can't allow the original claim to looked at or seriously revisited it can't have any transparency. Not surprised at all if it starts spouting about bs national security claims which would get to the heart of where we're going with this which is government is not entitled to any kind of secrecy as state secrecy is not only antithetical to privacy but also to to free speech and just and functional government and further expediency claims cannot be used to stop due process. Hoping Wikileaks comes through for what is coming. We have to find a way to make all forms of government secrecy impractical.
Part of what is happening is sponsored media and its speech enclosure of the US consists of 6 companies that try to determine everything that the American public is allowed to know based on highest bidder payments from big corporations or cartels or foreign entities and countries and this is known as sponsorship covered by the notion that the actual purpose is product sales. It is not, its actual purpose is to productize the citizenry and strip the citizenry of its power.
When Tesla succeeds in communicating directly with the public via Twitter that sponsorship is cut out of the loop, it can't pre-spin stuff and it is in a reactive position looking properly stupid facing anger and blow back from its sponsor bribers. When Tesla succeeds without paying for access to the artificially enclosed public mindshare the whole sponsored media franchise of lies is at stake and they complain bitterly about social media and claim it is being manipulated in a vanta black pot calling a kettle black kind of way- but for instance just look at the number of dual citizenships in the higher ranks of these media conglomerates and look at where their focus is, its on the Mid East not the US- even their personnel is sponsored in this captured media that leads to captured government.
So once again when they are allowed to do what they want they profit from highest bidder political candidate filtering as a way of silencing the public before the voting ever begins- think of it as media gerrymandering, but again they also engage in highest bidder censorship and spin beyond that and with twitter that whole system is getting bypassed so they for instance try to gag through a corrupt agency like the SEC any precedent setting user of free speech e.g. Tesla from using its CEO to spread material news through Twitter. Think of how utterly stupid the SEC's demand is on its surface and very likely in its depth over and over its about not being able to communicate material info by Twitter. Ask why the venue matters and the reasons the SEC provides don't seem remotely good enough. Their problem with Twitter is its missing the sponsor filter and surely they were angling given their obvious bias or the bias of the people puppeting the SEC for shill to filter Musk, you could even see it in the shill media interview Leslie Stahl did with Musk where she was giddy with the idea that Musk would be gagged and censored. And look at where this leads would we rather have our government captured or made into a puppet for a Mid East state or Russia or Exxon, or Monsanto or AG Farben or Halliburton or Black Water or Wackenhut or the British East India Company or the Queen? We don't want sell out traitorous intermediaries manufacturing highest bidder law and its coercive culture.
But with regard to Twitter being a material platform, public entities generally do a speculative budget which they publish as guidance and then they do final budgets which they also publish do you see the difference here and in both cases its done electronically? And then look again at how inaccurate the sponsored media coverage is of this stuff and even the SEC's own claims at face value appear to be in-accurate. The SEC never proved fraud about anything and shouldn't be given the benefit of the doubt on that but media pitches it as if they did. SEC also tried this stupid contractual arrangement which was supposed to be above question and challenge as if this were an act of leniency instead of taking advantage of the public and of Tesla shareholders and of Musk. Our system curtails speech in many ways most importantly in order to protect political speech but this stuff appears to be the opposite of protecting vital political speech, it is an arbitrary gag order. A former member of the SEC board said the original decision was bad and apparently there is a whole community that considers it unbelievably bad. Is a Herodian SEC attempting to create martyrs? What is the logic?
So again if a company like Tesla is successful then we see the speech enclosure and the artificial scarcity of the whole sponsor filter mechanism can be bypassed and the whole rent seeking narrative is bypassed meaning they can't do things like make people work more hours to increase control and keep them down. So Twitter bypasses and they don't get to do their little exclusive stories, they are put in the back where they belong because we need real media reconstruction- we need media rid of the conflicts of interest down to its very charter- they act like only these corporations have speech and everyone has to be filtered by them and has to bribe and pay them off to communicate- they are suppressing citizen speech and claim immunity for doing so, but also claim the right to lie to the public for money and even mislead the public about matters of public health like climate change. So we have a media based on a extreme conflict of interest. This is why Wikileaks is the most valid and viable media or medium out there.