KiwiME
Well-Known Member
Reads like a word salad, technically correct but unnecessarily generalised. No one has gone wrong by simply referring to the owner's manual.
An ATF is a perfectly suitable alternate lubricant because it has a similar viscosity and the same GL rating as the OEM Hyundai 70W GL4 DCT. I know of one owner who is using that. Some 70W-75 gears oils have the similar viscosity as 70W oils.
The vast majority of other EVs specify an ATF rather than a 70W GL4 and part of that is likely because it's on the shelf at their dealers. Hyundai/Kia 70W DCT is on the shelf because their DCT (direct shift) gearboxes use that. However all newer H/K EVs specify their ATF instead.
I've been experimenting with a 75W-80 GL-4 but fortunately I know how lubrication requirements are determined. I also know what conditions my car is subject to that allows more flexibility of choice than is available to owners in general. Plus I know what signs to monitor that might indicate that it's not appropriate, including efficiency.
So far it's been brilliant but I'm refraining from accepting it fully until it's been in place for one year, ending May 2025, so I can check the magnetic plugs. I certainly haven't seen "reduced gearbox efficiency, poor cooling, or component damage".
An ATF is a perfectly suitable alternate lubricant because it has a similar viscosity and the same GL rating as the OEM Hyundai 70W GL4 DCT. I know of one owner who is using that. Some 70W-75 gears oils have the similar viscosity as 70W oils.
The vast majority of other EVs specify an ATF rather than a 70W GL4 and part of that is likely because it's on the shelf at their dealers. Hyundai/Kia 70W DCT is on the shelf because their DCT (direct shift) gearboxes use that. However all newer H/K EVs specify their ATF instead.
I've been experimenting with a 75W-80 GL-4 but fortunately I know how lubrication requirements are determined. I also know what conditions my car is subject to that allows more flexibility of choice than is available to owners in general. Plus I know what signs to monitor that might indicate that it's not appropriate, including efficiency.
So far it's been brilliant but I'm refraining from accepting it fully until it's been in place for one year, ending May 2025, so I can check the magnetic plugs. I certainly haven't seen "reduced gearbox efficiency, poor cooling, or component damage".
Last edited: