I was driving on the freeway in a heavy rain with cruise control set on....
Honda is pretty clear about this practice. This is a Clarity Owner's manual direct quote:
WARNING: Improper use of ACC with LSF can lead to a crash.
Use ACC with LSF only when driving on expressways or freeways and in good weather conditions.
In my claim adjuster days, not long ago, I handled a claim on a Subaru Legacy with Eyesight (competitive/similar system to Honda Sensing). I was an independent adjuster and rep'd the insurance company. Owner/customer insisted to me that the car suddenly self-accelerated up her long snowy driveway and caused her to ram straight into a large tree on her own property, and she wanted to blame Subaru for having a defect somewhere and have the car investigated. Wanted the insurance company to subrogate against Subaru for cost of the accident. I also inspected the accident scene at her home, and didn't doubt that her description is exactly what happened, though she insisted she was stepping on the brake as it was accelerating, and the car wasn't responding to the brake. I had no way of knowing whether that statement was true without a black box investigation where we hire specialists to read the computers for the actions of the drivers, and the car, in the moments leading to the accident. She specifically said she bought the car for the Eyesight feature, and drove with it activated 100% of the time for safety reasons.
So I ran it up the line for review. Did they want to pay for the black box investigation and look into this claim further? The insurance company legal reps took one quick look at Subaru's warnings in the owner manual about never having ACC activated on any secondary roads (much less driveways), never use it in the snow/bad weather, etc...and then flatly informed the customer that she was 100% responsible for the crash by having the ACC activated at times when she clearly should not have. She didn't read/understand the clear instructions of the system in the owners manual, and for this reason the insurance company saw no hope for recovery. They therefore would not attempt to pursue Subaru for any recovery or pay any additional expenses of checking the car for further defects. Insurance company just totaled the car, paid the collision claim minus deductible, and hit the customer for a chargeable accident on her record. Told her if she wanted to persue Subaru further, she was on her own.
Everyone needs to understand when to use these features, and more importantly, when to NOT use these features. Accidents can and do happen as a direct result of these perceived safety features, when the driver doesn't use them correctly.