Robert_Alabama
Well-Known Member
I drive rather aggressively, but I don't like accidentally tripping the ICE. I drive in ECON mode 100% of the time, but try to stay just shy of the accelerator detent.
So my Clarity Will seat four Normals, just not one behind the wheel?The problem is compounded by there being a Normal for the Lane Keeping Assist System, a Normal for the Forward Collision Warning Distance, a Normal for the Road Departure Mitigation Setting, and a Normal setting for the back-up camera.
The Service Bulletin for that will be released shortly.So my Clarity Will seat four Normals, just not one behind the wheel?
Also, Clarity does everything pretty good in NORMAL, so that might be a good mode for new drivers to start in. NORMAL could also be a good mode to casually see if the car is doing anything really weird (as opposed to driving style combined with other modes (even though NORMAL is just one mapping of some other modes)).
I would agree with the exception of ACC use on the highway, similar to what some others have said.
Rather than "pretty good" I would characterize the car's ACC behavior in Normal as "awful", "horrible" in Econ, and "lousy" in Sport. Both Normal and Econ cause the car to jerk forward and the power gauge to go up to near 100% when starting up a hill, whereas in Sport its more of a surge to just 50-60%. I can't stand that jerkiness. Lousy is the best selection here so I stick to Sport in ACC, and that has now spread to other times so I'm in Sport probably 80% of the time overall.
I would agree with the exception of ACC use on the highway, similar to what some others have said.
Rather than "pretty good" I would characterize the car's ACC behavior in Normal as "awful", "horrible" in Econ, and "lousy" in Sport. Both Normal and Econ cause the car to jerk forward and the power gauge to go up to near 100% when starting up a hill, whereas in Sport its more of a surge to just 50-60%. I can't stand that jerkiness. Lousy is the best selection here so I stick to Sport in ACC, and that has now spread to other times so I'm in Sport probably 80% of the time overall.
I have never experienced this. Are we talking about ACC use other than on the highway? I generally have mine set for the longest distance from the car in front (which is how I drive without CC) and everything is very smooth.
I have never experienced this. Are we talking about ACC use other than on the highway? I generally have mine set for the longest distance from the car in front (which is how I drive without CC) and everything is very smooth.
You must not have much in the way of hills.
I go to central VT most every weekend in the winter and it does the same thing there, but the hills are longer so it doesn't happen as often as in southern CT. So could you sometime try setting yours on the highway to 72 and see how much the speed varies as you go up and down the hills? Or tell me how much yours varies at some other speed and I will run a comparison to mine?I live in central Vermont. It's all hills except when it's mountains. I drive in ECON 100% of the time. My only complaint about ACC is the slow uptake on passing a slower vehicle. If it is not quick enough I just press on the accelerator. Then it resets the ACCwhen I pull back into the right hand lane and slows down to the set speed.
I go to central VT most every weekend in the winter and it does the same thing there, but the hills are longer so it doesn't happen as often as in southern CT. So could you sometime try setting yours on the highway to 72 and see how much the speed varies as you go up and down the hills? Or tell me how much yours varies at some other speed and I will run a comparison to mine?
I own a CRV with ACC. Although they have the same components, controls, and options the actual operation of the system on the two vehicles is significantly different. The biggest difference is that with the CRV after I speed up past the set point by pressing the accelerator to pass another vehicle and then remove the pressure on the accelerator, the car simply coasts back to the set speed. With the Clarity, in the same situation, it applies significant braking to reduce the speed to the set point, undershooting the goal, then applies power to return to the desired speed. Even if I hold down the accelerator enough to keep it disengaged until I return to the set speed, as soon as I release the pressure on the accelerator and re-engage the ACC, it still allows the speed to drop 2-3 mph then applies power. This behavior is worse in ECON. Compared to how the same system works on the CRV, I find it quite annoying.
I go to central VT most every weekend in the winter and it does the same thing there, but the hills are longer so it doesn't happen as often as in southern CT. So could you sometime try setting yours on the highway to 72 and see how much the speed varies as you go up and down the hills? Or tell me how much yours varies at some other speed and I will run a comparison to mine?
I’ve never had a car with ACC, so I have nothing to compare it to, but I’ve had none of the issue since with jerkiness that David outlines. I’m almost always in SPORT, and vary the following distance with traffic conditions. Overall, I’d rate it a simple quite smooth.
OK thank you for the special effort! Next time I am on the highway I will it set at 67 and see if that changes the jerkiness. My guess is it will, and maybe the different speeds we drive at are the main difference in how the ACC works.Ok, today I drove to Burlington across the Greens. The car was in ECON/HV with the ACC set for 67 mph and the longest distance from the car in front. The speed of the car varied from 65 to 67 mph. There was no sudden slowing down or speeding up except when coming up on a slow vehicle. Variations in speed seemed very gradual. Frankly, I would not have noticed if I had not promised to pay attention for you. (I have to make a special effort to see the mph on the DII because the steering wheel is in the way because I am short--so irritating.)
Maybe my expectations are low because, like @Fast Eddie B, I have never had ACC before. I love it. But I agree with his assessment: