Penclewhipped! Ha! That is perfect and so apropos for my world. Yes, there are a lot of pencils involved in any product, all are not the required #2 we used to use for tests. I have had a few complaints about the Clarity PHEV, but all are those that based on a small amount of 'due diligence" I knew about before going to the dealer, or after the test drive. I still bought the car because I love it's overall design (technical, not really body style) and "bang for the buck." Tesla was not an option for a number of personal reasons and Chevy was just to small for the family. I came from an Acura TL-S and wanted something more comfortable. I drove Cadillacs prior to the Acuras. This car checked 90+% of the boxes. I fixed the stereo issues that I perceived to my liking, and also a few delivery bugs. I actually enjoyed working on the car, it was fun! I like that there is still a "car" wrapped around the batteries and hi tech, and also feel fortunate to be conformable in my lamen's understanding of the HV side of the powerplant. The dealers have a long way to go to reach roadside service for this vehicle - but so far I do not see any single "stranding" item on the failure mode software fallback list publicly available from Honda. They seemed to have designed the vehicle with compromise to attempt to the best of their abilities in making it a "reliable Honda." I hope so. However I do really enjoy the vehicle - everything I am doing to it now is just icing for the cake. Yes, I would prefer to have a Tesla P100D with Ludicrous mode but I also enjoy still being able to take the kids on vacation - or out to eat... I personally appreciate Honda making this car, as even when I look at economies of scale from a distance, I don't think this was easy. It is likely a loss leader. Which if from another company would concern me. However my personal goal is to have the HV Batt fail capacity at 7.9 years, and get a brand new higher cap solid state HV battery in it's stead.
Fingers crossed but would buy another one tomorrow!
Cash