I believe the answer to this question is obvious from the new tariffs coming for countries not willing to support the surrender of Greenland. The concept of the carrot does not appear to be part of our current admnistration's toolkit.
Yeah, but there might be a difference between not supporting and openly opposing the acquisition of Greenland. Canada might be better off to keep our mouths shut about this.
This might not sound very patriotic (for Canada), but I would suggest that we actually should support Trump on this. We need to be pragmatic. The US is our biggest trading partner, by far, and they can indeed destroy us economically if they want. We do not want to poke the bear if we can help it. Look what happened when Premier Ford of Ontario launched that anti-tariff ad in the US. We were on the brink of a new trade deal with the US, and it was promptly put on the back burner after that.
Even Carney, our Prime Minister, said about China that we have to recognize what is, and not just what we might want it be. At the least he is trying to create options for us, to mitigate further US tariffs and sanctions against us. This is exactly what he said:
“It’s a partnership that reflects the world as it is today, with an engagement that is realistic, respectful and interest-based,” Carney said at a news conference in Beijing.
Carney said he raised human rights in the meeting with Xi, and said Canada has a “value-based realism” to its approach.
“We fundamentally stand up for human rights, for democracy, territorial integrity, rights to self-determination,” he said. “We take the world as it is, not as we wish it to be.”