JFon101231
Active Member
Figured before I spent some time making one in spare time I dont really have I'd ask 

That's a good question. I would imagine that with conversion losses it would be upwards of 15% more expensive than the cost of gasoline. Next time I need to use HV Charge mode I will crunch the numbers.Has anyone done a detailed calculation of the price to charge the car using HV charge mode?
How about a graph...
Yes, at those prices gasoline is between $0.005 and $0.01 cheaper than electricity in your area.@MrFixit Any chance you could blow up the quadrant under $4/gal and $0.25/kWh? Sadly with CT electric rates around $0.18 kWh and gas around $2.20/gal seems it confirms my suspicion gas is actually cheaper right now.
Same here. If I had to pay the city electric utility $0.15/kWh my break even price would be about $2.00. But as we charge with solar it will never pay to use gas.Honda claims 42 mpg. I usually get closer to 50. Take 45 as a pessimistic average guess. 45 miles is close to a pessimistic electric-only range, too. Your easy napkin-calculation is to divide the price of a gallon of gas by the 17 kWh of a full charge.
A gallon of gas near me costs $1.68. Divided by 17 kWh that's 9.8¢ for even prices. However, given my electricity is free, it never makes sense to get that gas unless I'm going beyond electric range![]()
Even if you have solar panels, electricity is not free if you have "net energy metering". Any excess power your panels generate gets sold back to your utility. On that basis, your electric charging of your PHEV "costs" you the amount that your utility (PG&E in my case) would pay you for the power you sent back to the grid if you didn't use it for your Clarity.Same here. If I had to pay the city electric utility $0.15/kWh my break even price would be about $2.00. But as we charge with solar it will never pay to use gas.
Even if you have solar panels, electricity is not free if you have "net energy metering". Any excess power your panels generate gets sold back to your utility. On that basis, your electric charging of your PHEV "costs" you the amount that your utility (PG&E in my case) would pay you for the power you sent back to the grid if you didn't use it for your Clarity.
That's a good question. I would imagine that with conversion losses it would be upwards of 15% more expensive than the cost of gasoline. Next time I need to use HV Charge mode I will crunch the numbers.
I am by no means a solar contrarian, and don't want to start a firestorm.
But... Solar power is far from free until the cost of the array has been completely offset by your energy savings.
This process takes time. Dave included the caveat (ignoring amortization), but it is definitely a little misleading for anyone to claim they "drive for free" because they have solar panels.
You're right, but it would also be misleading to say one "drives for free" with a non-EV if one happened to somehow win a year of free gasoline fill-ups, since one is also amortizing the cost of the car too (not to mention maintenence costs).
Well, we agree in principal, but you can't amortize the cost of the car for the non-EV and not do the same for the EV. Therefore, the cost of the car is basically a wash (ok, you can argue that the ICE car requires more maintenance than the EV - Of course the Clarity is the worst of both worlds because of the dual powertrain).
This is off-topic, but here in the Mid-Atlantic, we have heat pumps. They are the major driver when it comes to total electric usage. It is relatively 'easy' to have a reasonable PV system that covers 100% of your needs if not for the heat pump. In my case, I would roughly need a 10 kW system to meet the entire need. What is the total capacity of your PV setup?