Pushmi-Pullyu
Well-Known Member
Thanks @Pushmi-Pullyu. I hope you will agree, given that we have butted heads on an occasion or two, that I try to be objective.
Absolutely! We may disagree, but I respect your opinions and hopefully you return the favor. It is possible for people of good will to "disagree without being disagreeable".
The same can't be said for those whose only purpose here is to attack the public image of Tesla Inc. and its cars.
My point here is simple, even if Electrify American can get away with doing what they want, they are required to do what is in the communities best interest, not their own interest. This is atonement for dieselgate.
That's the ideal, certainly. But with the current U.S. presidential administration being so virulently anti-"green", and trying so hard to completely dismantle the EPA's regulatory system, and otherwise to "make 'Murica safe for polluters again", actual enforcement of the requirement for Electrify America to benefit all EV drivers is very unlikely to be pursued diligently... if at all.
I hope nobody thinks this is just empty political rhetoric. Four-Five (the current U.S. President) has appointed people to head the EPA whose intention is to dismantle and destroy as much of the agency as possible. Four-Five's first appointee (before he was forced to resign due to numerous scandals) was Scott Pruitt. Previously, as Oklahoma Attorney General, Pruitt sued the EPA 14 times to block clean air and water safeguards.
That's a fact. And this was the first person Four-Five chose to head the EPA. The replacement is an outspoken climate change denier* and former coal lobbyist.
*He's the guy who famously showed a snowball on the Senate floor to "prove" global warming isn't real.
Last edited: