Perhaps they don't say this because they are exactly the same batteries (with minor modifications as time moves on).
Original cells (2018 - ~2020 were LG E63)
https://www.insideevsforum.com/comm...tery-and-see-real-capacity.10585/#post-124755
Replacement E66A cells were developed to replace the E63 offering more energy density with less weight and volume (slight chemistry alteration - NCM 622 (E63) to NCM 712 (E66A):
LG Chem LGX E63
- Nominal Capacity: 65,6 Ah (discharged at 21,6 A) – 64,8 Ah (discharged at 32,5 A)
- Minimum Capacity: 64,6 Ah (discharged at 21,6 A) – 63,8 Ah (discharged at 32,5 A)
- Nominal Voltage: 3,6 V
- Charging Voltage: 4,2 V
- Thickness: 11,5 mm
- Width: 125 mm
- Height: 325 mm
- Volume: 0,4671875 L
- Weight: 964,9 g
- Volumetric Energy Density: 492-505 Wh/L
- Gravimetric Energy Density: 238-245 Wh/kg
- Chemistry: NCM 622
This was the first battery cell to give the Renault ZOE a decent range with a 41 kWh battery in late 2016, almost doubling it from the previous generation.
LG Chem E66A
- Nominal Capacity: 65 Ah
- Minimum Capacity: 63,5 Ah
- Nominal Voltage: 3,657 V
- Nominal energy: 237,7 Wh
- Minimum energy: 232,2 Wh
- Thickness: 11,7 mm
- Width: 104 mm
- Height: 350 mm
- Volume: 0,425880 L
- Weight: 897 g
- Volumetric Energy Density: 648 Wh/L
- Gravimetric Energy Density: 259 Wh/kg
- Chemistry: NCM 712
The E66A was made to be a direct replacement for the E63 battery cell. Capacities are very similar, but dimensions and weight are lower. This battery cell is used in the battery pack of the Porsche Taycan, which doesn’t much sense. The large and flat battery pack of the Porsche Taycan could benefit from the usage of longer cells such as the E78.
https://pushevs.com/2021/03/30/ncm-712-by-lg-chem-e66a-and-e78-battery-cells/
and
https://pushevs.com/2020/04/04/comparison-of-different-ev-batteries-in-2020/
While not sure, I think that this battery cell is also used by the Renault Twingo Electric and the latest versions of the Hyundai Kona Electric and Chevrolet Bolt EV.
The manufacturing process of assembling those materials into cell format apparently has not changed, and this is where the issue resides. Perhaps occurring in the folding portion, being intermittent makes it hard to trace. I wonder if the separators, or anodes are installed off a
roll (similar to toilet paper), and create a problem when they are down to a few sheets. (rather simple explanation, but that's all I could come up with). If the problem were repeated in every cell manufactured, than that would relate to every battery pack produced, but it doesn't, nor has it showed up in Porsche.
It didn't take very long after N.A. introduction for the first issue to occur (several months)
https://www.insideevsforum.com/community/index.php?threads/exploding-kona-electric.6342/
Korean cars seemed to take a little longer before showing similar symptoms (2 days to be exact):
"Another Kona Electric caught fire while charging in Gangneung, Gangwon Province, South Korea on July 28, 2019.
[117]"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plug-in_electric_vehicle_fire_incidents
That is if one doesn't count the 2 that occurred on the Ulsan production line May and August 2018.
The BMS software has been improved to detect issues to help prevent these from occurring, but the root of the problem is still in the manufacturing/assembly at the cell level, Kudos to GM with their response, Hyundai seems to be dragging their feet bound by commitments with LG.
If the issues cannot be resolved, perhaps replacements should be provided by SK Innovation (with LG footing the bill), even if it affects only a limited number of vehicles. Maybe this will wake them up at a corperate level
