you don't drive your Miata in the Canadian winters.
I'm afraid you're under the common misunderstanding about RWD or FWD in snow that comes (correctly) from the ICE paradigm. I've only driven once in the snow in Ontario but have driven plenty in Wisconsin and upstate New York. With ICE, FWD is definitely better because of the weight of the engine on top of the drive wheels. With a Tesla, your weight is well distributed at about 50:50 so the rear wheels get good traction. With experience, most will prefer a RWD Tesla to pretty much any ICE, including FWD and 4WD. We've argued this before and I suspect we'll need to continue to agree to disagree until we can do some ice autocross between good and comparable FWD and AWD EVs.
Other misconceptions:
AWD is even better in the winter, but it adds weight, uses more power, hampers range, reduces interior space, and increases the price.
These 5 "facts" are insignificant, incorrect, incorrect, irrelevant, and true with EVs.
1) adds weight: (insignificant) - doesn't add much and weight isn't really a huge factor for EVs excerpt for possibly extreme track handling. Even then, the additional thrust and control arguably compensates.
2) uses more power: (incorrect if done properly) - Another ICE paradigm that doesn't hold for EVs. 2 electrical motors pulling from the same battery are more efficient than 1 identical electric motor. Similarly, a large, powerful electric motor is more efficient than a small, weaker one. This is because there is essentially more copper generating the electromagnetic field, requiring less current. Most motor loss is due to the IsquaredC losses where I is current which is squared. Reducing it very much outweighs the extra weight of the copper or the other motor. Also, having 2 motors enables a different gear ratio for each which gives an additional amount of optimization against the back EMF that starts to limit the power of an electric motor at high RPMs. Remember that most EV motors, even those on the Tesla P100D are only about the size of a watermelon so they don't add much weight. 4WD on an ICE requires additional lossy drivetrain components, and heavy gears and driveshafts which cause inefficiency.
3) hampers range: (incorrect if done properly) - see 2) above
4) reduces interior space: (irrelevant if done properly) - this is because, if a model is designed for the 2nd motor option, the space (which is very small) is pretty much wasted. The Model S is a good example. Early ones had a big "microwave oven area" in the frunk which was later filled in with the 2nd motor. Once the design was for the 2 motors, IIRC, the 2wd still did not get that microwave one area. It was so named because of its size and shape. EV motors are very small. Adding another doesn't take much space.
4) price: true. It is a bit more expensive. But since electric motors are relatively cheap, its a lot cheaper to make a 4wd EV than an ICE because of all of the linkages (transfer case, driveshaft, gears, etc) that the ICE needs
You appear to be well schooled in ICE and I'll definitely defer to your knowledge there but suggest that you should consider thinking differently when it comes to EVs. The tradeoffs for the 2 differ.