New Kona EV Ultimate Owner in Maryland. 2000 miles so far.
This is what I take from this thread so far, and from Googling about regenerative braking vs. coasting generally: All things being equal, in a perfectly controlled environment, with the same car, same driver, same driving conditions, etc. etc., then max coasting will result in the highest EV range efficiency.
However, are things really all that equal? Most people are not hyper-milers, itching to extract every mile out of a single charge. Most people will drive in a mix of environments, both in terms of "flat" vs. "hilly" driving, and in terms of climate. And of course, we are driving different cars from different manufacturers with different approaches to implementation of regenerative driving. Even Mr. Blanchard alluded to the fact that different circumstances require different approaches.
It would be helpful if we could go back to the original question which focused on regenerative braking for the Kona EV, rather than a theoretical discussion on EV regen mechanics in general. For example, in the Kona EV you have four levels of regen, and you have three drive modes (eco, normal, sport). There is a display that shows expected "eco" benefits for each drive mode/regen combination. You have the ability to change the regen rate (overriding the default) for each drive mode. If coasting was always more beneficial, you would expect the "eco" benefit (which I assume translates to kwh efficiency) to go up when reducing regen rate for a given mode. However, the display shows the exact opposite! The "eco" benefit increases as you increase regen rate for any given drive mode.
For example, in "Eco" mode, with max regen set to max (3), the display says "85% eco benefit". (Or something like that, it is not right in front of me as I write this.). In the same mode, if you reduce regen to 2, then the eco benefit display changes to "65%" (Again, not exact, but you get the idea.)
So, either the display is complete BS, or the definitions of "eco benefit" is not clear, or Hyundai has implemented a system where the efficiency of regen is always better than coasting because of the particular way Hyundai has engineered the Kona. Quite frankly, it is not clear what the real difference is between the drive modes, other than climate limits, speed limits, and regen rate. If you set drive mode to "Eco", with the same settings as "Sport", is something else happening that is not in your control that is creating a difference between these two modes? Who knows, it is not clear.
In the end we average Kona owners just want to know this: in average, every day, normal driving, is there any real benefit to regenerative braking at all in the Kona EV, other than personal preference?