HoustonBeerMan
New Member
I have their system on my 2013 Volt. Their Facebook page is down, no one answers their phones and all of their voicemail boxes are full. Can't find any confirmation that they ceased operations.
I have their system on my 2013 Volt. Their Facebook page is down, no one answers their phones and all of their voicemail boxes are full. Can't find any confirmation that they ceased operations.
We looked into a plugless...
I can understand why people want to get away from mucking about with cables, but these systems are bound to be expensive and inefficient.
If they are on concrete containing rebars, I imagine they will degrade the efficiency even more and may even have to be removed. A powerful system could well raise them to red heat which wouldn't do the concrete much good. There are problems in public spaces too. Metallic litter such as drinks cans might well degrade the efficiency too.
Some kind of robot system capable of making a physical connection seems a better plan to me.
I don't think that is really 'Wireless' in the sense of no physical connection. There seems to be a physical electrical connection between the car and the mat underneath it. It looks like a chequerboard pattern of positive and negative cells and some clever switching to ensure that the polarity from a misaligned set of contacts comes out right.
Maybe that is a more practical approach than inductive systems, but I wonder how dirt picked up from the road might affect connections.
Easelink does connect, but I tested a Plugless Power system last year and there was a 4" gap between the pad and the car.You know what? I think you're right. I just saw the Easelink on display and since it resembles an inductive charger and didn't have it connector deployed, it thought it was wireless. It is not.
One would think they would be inefficient, but some wireless companies claim extremely high efficiency rates. Easelink, for example, claims 99%. That seems crazy high, and I'd like to see some independent testing to confirm that figure, but I've seen other claims of over 90% from better known companies.
If they are on concrete containing rebars, I imagine they will degrade the efficiency even more and may even have to be removed.