In the process of transitioning from PHEVs to BEVs, GM has a huge problem, a viable charging network. GM must, in very quick order, build out a charging network of at least the magnitude of Tesla’s. This is not easy from the standpoint of timelines, logistics or cost. Alternatively, they would need to develop a battery with a sufficient range that will eliminate range anxiety for the average buyer. Without a dense charging network, even a 300 mile battery will be a problem for many prospective buyers that like road trips.Since GM kept the Bolt and dropped the volt, does this suggest that the industry will skip over plug in hybrids, in favor of all battery vehicles.
Engines and transmissions are expensive to build. As battery prices come down and performance improves, BEV's could become the least expensive auto to build.
I love my Clarity, but I suspect that PHEV's will never become very popular, the world will shift directly to BEV's.
Even though my Tesla has a range of only about 260 miles, the SuperCharger network eliminates (or at least greatly mitigates) range anxiety. I could go from NY to Florida with no concerns about getting there, not because of my battery’s range, but because of the relatively dense SC network.
Our Thanksgiving day trip was a 100 mile route from eastern LI to NJ. I could have made the round trip without charging, but I always like to show my wife how relatively easy it is to find a SC, ‘fill up’, and go. We stopped at a SC about 12 minutes from our destination in NJ, and took a break at a McDonalds that was a 1 minute walk from the SC.
This is what GM needs to do if they expect a big sales transition to electrics. If they don’t, and gas prices remain low, they’ll likely meet the same fate as the Volt no matter what kind of vehicle they build.