Ok, so I had my first, yearly service last week. They said there was a firmware update and I hoped that the GOM would be fixed. Alas, no it wasn't. But I have been carefully looking at it since everything was reset. When I got the car back, the avg consumption was 22kWh/100km - obviously the service mechanics enjoyed the car 
After a week, I am back to 12.6/100km. The average consumption marries up with my actual consumption - well it will soon, it is still going down. Anyway, I noticed something and I now believe the MINI engineers drank the EPA coolaid. My range appears to be almost exactly out by a factor of 0.7 . This is the factor the EPA multiply the real result by to get the reported range. When I worked it out, my indicated 174km becomes around 250 (170/0.7). This factor continues all the way through. At each point, when I calculated the real range, the GOM was out by 0.7 . That got me thinking that maybe they are using the 10-80% battery methodology (ie. 70% of the battery).
If I could magically factor the 0.7 in, my GOM would be very close to spot on. I went for a very spirited drive (to see what would happen), and my range next charge was 155km. This translated to about 220km, which was spot on what I calculated. It could be the GOM has been updated, but is still reading ludicrously low, however it is now accurate when you divide by 0.7 .This means it is still useless, as dividing by 0.7 in your head is not the easiest. It does mean we are getting closser to a fuctional GOM though.

After a week, I am back to 12.6/100km. The average consumption marries up with my actual consumption - well it will soon, it is still going down. Anyway, I noticed something and I now believe the MINI engineers drank the EPA coolaid. My range appears to be almost exactly out by a factor of 0.7 . This is the factor the EPA multiply the real result by to get the reported range. When I worked it out, my indicated 174km becomes around 250 (170/0.7). This factor continues all the way through. At each point, when I calculated the real range, the GOM was out by 0.7 . That got me thinking that maybe they are using the 10-80% battery methodology (ie. 70% of the battery).
If I could magically factor the 0.7 in, my GOM would be very close to spot on. I went for a very spirited drive (to see what would happen), and my range next charge was 155km. This translated to about 220km, which was spot on what I calculated. It could be the GOM has been updated, but is still reading ludicrously low, however it is now accurate when you divide by 0.7 .This means it is still useless, as dividing by 0.7 in your head is not the easiest. It does mean we are getting closser to a fuctional GOM though.