If rip off never actually profitable natural gas companies (which includes all of them) that already 3x what rural coops that use NG (where such coops are still 6x more expensive than battery backed solar) can't make a profit on their captive local monopoly customer base they try to say the law entitles them to a 10% guaranteed return above inflation- and when these entities actually face competition from solar they try to increase the grid tie fee or try to fraud on the metering to try to say their remaining customers should absorb their losses with increased prices instead of the incredibly entitled foolish rent seekers who 'invested' in this scam and scammed others like pension funds into it to provide human shield held hostage covers. That is wrong all wrong!!! The only acceptable approach is they eat the full cost first and foremost before pensioners and others and way before customers because the whole point is to end their useless rent seeking because it amounts to theft and profiting from damaging people's health and future.
So called road use taxes on electric cars are even worse because they attempt to make a core part of the solution more expensive to preserve the ill-gotten fossil fuel profits- stuff that unlike green couldn't even exist without massive subsides and even with massive subsidies will never be competitive again even as it hasn't be for 7 decades and even as it was always a super lean proposition almost never above water on own and usually dragging everything down with it. So in all these cases it is easy to see what to do, we always (ALWAYS) take the action that reduces or eliminates fossil fuel profits or accelerates the movement in that direction or if possible runs up fossil fuel debts to effect bankruptcy but without bailout and with the damage focused on the fossil fuel rent seekers to break the rent seeking mechanism. This is picking winners and losers because fossil fuels are and have been for 70 years the biggest losers in history and have been totally obsolete for at least that long. No more thieving from others to enrich rent seeking parasites. Its very simple and no more bribe taking politicians backing that nonsense up.
For some of the billionaires in fossil fuels you just sanction the fossil fuel monies like we do with states. We say you've bilked the planet and the global population enough with your rent seeking not a single cent more for you or its all confiscated. They get Roosevelt's wealth cap and it could be total. We don't allow business to push society around, that should never ever be happening, its totally unthinkable that this industry is pushing the globe around. This is based on their system of starving the populations for income making them like children with distended stomachs that can't think of anything but food. Here this starving for income allows them to create a dirty politics of bribery and lies. This stuff has to end and we have to put means in place so this can never happen again. We can't have people who think everyone has a price and a bigger bribe means the bribe is justified, we can't have people who want to have enough leverage over other people to tell them what to do and even worse can't have money as the basis of such criminality. These people have basically prostituted all of society. We shouldn't ever be having to fight with business, business should be disempowered, society should be able to easily knock it around. When business tries to defy what is obviously in the public interest it should just be straight incarceration, lost charters and liquidations- we can't get away with tolerating corruption. The planet should not be at risk over the greed and idiocy of a small group.
No more paid to lie bribes because that is the essence of killing democracy and its bearing false witness or testimony. So no more media capture. If a media outfit knowingly takes any money to mislead the public e.g. takes a sponsor bribe (essence of sponsorship is censorship- it is not there to move products) it needs to lose its charter and the people taking the bribe need to face the legal system. Really news organizations can't be allowed to take any sponsorship because it is a massive conflict of interest that always leads to wink wink bribes- they can be subscription based if the subscriptions are a set price and the subscription are on a per member of the general public kind of basis otherwise they need to identify as an ad. If a media company takes a single cent covering elections it needs to lose its charter. If a search company takes money to skew searches it needs to lose it charter. If a politician takes a single cent for any purpose related to running for office or any purpose while in office- not paid by the public treasury in a level playing field, open transparent way that person should be going to prison. No more bribery based society, no more thinking everyone has a price and the higher the price the more excusable the bribe.
A free press is just that it is not captured by money. A free people have a government that is not captured by money and as a precondition have systems that provide information as accurately as possible about the public interest and almost is in the public interest so lies are not protected and paid lies by common sense need to be recognized as high crime. Saying money is speech is saying theft is speech and loss of rights is speech and bondage is speech, so that double speak doctrine needs to be gone.
So called road use taxes on electric cars are even worse because they attempt to make a core part of the solution more expensive to preserve the ill-gotten fossil fuel profits- stuff that unlike green couldn't even exist without massive subsides and even with massive subsidies will never be competitive again even as it hasn't be for 7 decades and even as it was always a super lean proposition almost never above water on own and usually dragging everything down with it. So in all these cases it is easy to see what to do, we always (ALWAYS) take the action that reduces or eliminates fossil fuel profits or accelerates the movement in that direction or if possible runs up fossil fuel debts to effect bankruptcy but without bailout and with the damage focused on the fossil fuel rent seekers to break the rent seeking mechanism. This is picking winners and losers because fossil fuels are and have been for 70 years the biggest losers in history and have been totally obsolete for at least that long. No more thieving from others to enrich rent seeking parasites. Its very simple and no more bribe taking politicians backing that nonsense up.
For some of the billionaires in fossil fuels you just sanction the fossil fuel monies like we do with states. We say you've bilked the planet and the global population enough with your rent seeking not a single cent more for you or its all confiscated. They get Roosevelt's wealth cap and it could be total. We don't allow business to push society around, that should never ever be happening, its totally unthinkable that this industry is pushing the globe around. This is based on their system of starving the populations for income making them like children with distended stomachs that can't think of anything but food. Here this starving for income allows them to create a dirty politics of bribery and lies. This stuff has to end and we have to put means in place so this can never happen again. We can't have people who think everyone has a price and a bigger bribe means the bribe is justified, we can't have people who want to have enough leverage over other people to tell them what to do and even worse can't have money as the basis of such criminality. These people have basically prostituted all of society. We shouldn't ever be having to fight with business, business should be disempowered, society should be able to easily knock it around. When business tries to defy what is obviously in the public interest it should just be straight incarceration, lost charters and liquidations- we can't get away with tolerating corruption. The planet should not be at risk over the greed and idiocy of a small group.
No more paid to lie bribes because that is the essence of killing democracy and its bearing false witness or testimony. So no more media capture. If a media outfit knowingly takes any money to mislead the public e.g. takes a sponsor bribe (essence of sponsorship is censorship- it is not there to move products) it needs to lose its charter and the people taking the bribe need to face the legal system. Really news organizations can't be allowed to take any sponsorship because it is a massive conflict of interest that always leads to wink wink bribes- they can be subscription based if the subscriptions are a set price and the subscription are on a per member of the general public kind of basis otherwise they need to identify as an ad. If a media company takes a single cent covering elections it needs to lose its charter. If a search company takes money to skew searches it needs to lose it charter. If a politician takes a single cent for any purpose related to running for office or any purpose while in office- not paid by the public treasury in a level playing field, open transparent way that person should be going to prison. No more bribery based society, no more thinking everyone has a price and the higher the price the more excusable the bribe.
A free press is just that it is not captured by money. A free people have a government that is not captured by money and as a precondition have systems that provide information as accurately as possible about the public interest and almost is in the public interest so lies are not protected and paid lies by common sense need to be recognized as high crime. Saying money is speech is saying theft is speech and loss of rights is speech and bondage is speech, so that double speak doctrine needs to be gone.