A much easier way to evaluate the range/efficiency/cost etc is to use the kWh/100km setting.I can't seem to grasp this. The kM/KWH..... Which is more efficient. Say 4.1KM/KWH or
8.2 KM/KWH...Thanks in advance
In the US it is opposite,... distance per consumption unit, eg mpg or miles per kWh. And lower is better.
Well, it all has it's advantages and disadvantages. With kWh/100km it's hard to estimate how far you can go if you have half a battery 32kwh left.A much easier way to evaluate the range/efficiency/cost etc is to use the kWh/100km setting.
Steering wheel/ settings/other/ energy consumption unit/ kWh/100km
Right now my dash accumulated display of 15.3 kWh/100km , if you divide 15.3 by 100 (2 decimal places) it equals .153 kWh or 153 watt hours per kilometer.
It is an easy visual and no need to divide once you are used to it. (15.3 = 153 watt hours/km)
If you pay 10 cents a kWh from your utility company, and you drive 10 km, at this efficiency this trip just cost you ; 1.533 kWh x 0.10 = 15.33 cents each km costing 1.53 cents.
Works for trip planning as well.
Whoops, blew that, yes, higher is better.I'm pretty sure more distance per unit is better, so higher is better!
Whoops, blew that, yes, higher is better.
That sounds about right for the typical driveI seem to be between 7 and 8 which is ok with me