The majority of people I talk to about PHEVs are interested in using EV for as much of their driving as possible with the ICE as a backup. They need to be just as aware of the drop in winter range as a BEV driver.
They should be made aware. They should also realize that reduced EV range with a PHEV is not a significant issue, whereas a BEV with 150-175 miles of range could easily be reduced to ~100 miles or less in cold weather. A BEV has no back up plan.
BEVs are not significantly affected by reduced winter range for daily driving because their range far exceeds what is needed on a daily basis. If they plan on using them for extended road trips, reduced range and charging options do come into play. Many have other vehicles available if needed.
Just about anything can handle daily driving. If they have another car, why buy an expensive BEV and lug around that 100kWh battery just to get groceries?
In your old tech example of a 75D, very few people need 148 miles on a daily basis.
I referenced the 75D since it was part of the AAA report, which is part of this discussion. Your statement got me thinking about how rewarding it must feel to all those buyers who popped $80K+, just a few years ago on a car that is now, as you say, “old tech”. That can’t be good for resale values. Do you anticipate that the cutting edge technology rolling out of the factory today will be considered “old tech” in 3-5 years? Who would want to own or buy such a relic?