GetOffYourGas
Well-Known Member
I'm with bldxyz. Take multiple measurements at high, mid, and low state-of-charge and we will get a much better idea.
Alien's encounter the same types of issues:For North America, the Owner's Manual says max Level 1 is 15 A. But the charge cable the SE comes with maxes out at 10 A.
That could be 2A into the battery. At 400V battery voltage that's about 800W, which would draw ~7A from a 120V outlet. Add in a couple hundred watts for battery temp control and you're at 10A
Dummy up a bicycle with an exercise stand and a generator and stick it atop your SE. Then tell your restless kids they'll ride that stationary bike to recharge the car on the next trip--and they'll be riding for a lot longer than 15 minutes. They'll fall all over themselves to fork over part of a week's allowance to buy that portable EVSE.I’m sort of torn about the portable L2 charger. On the one hand, we totally would have saved us the time, since a four hour visit would more than provide the top off we would need to get home. On the other hand, my kids both complained about being stuck in that backseat for the three hours of row trip driving.
Even on the freeway you should get 130 miles. After a weekend of fun twisties in sports mode, I am currently sitting on 175.8km with 26% left, which equates to 237km (147 miles) total range. 130 miles is 209km, so you should have around 10% left after the journey. Probably a bit squeaky, but still easily doable.
Honestly, if you already own a larger ICE car, that's the one for the road trips. Zero range anxiety. More room. Put the miles on the old car, rather than the new one.
I've got a Tesla with 310 miles of advertised range, as well as the SE, and when we took a national park roat trip tour a month ago, we rented a BMW X1 (little SUV), for exactly the same reasons you should take your ICE. 2300 miles later, we were very happy we never had to worry about where we stopped to fuel up.
IMO, until the EVSE infrastructure settles on a standard (hopefully J1772) and strengthens considerably, EVs are city cars that can, a little painfully, be taken cross country.
I've wondered what that means for BEVs, and whether or not insurance companies are updating their actuary tables.Put the miles on the old car, rather than the new one.
Honestly, if you already own a larger ICE car, that's the one for the road trips. Zero range anxiety. More room. Put the miles on the old car, rather than the new one.
I've got a Tesla with 310 miles of advertised range, as well as the SE, and when we took a national park roat trip tour a month ago, we rented a BMW X1 (little SUV), for exactly the same reasons you should take your ICE. 2300 miles later, we were very happy we never had to worry about where we stopped to fuel up.
IMO, until the EVSE infrastructure settles on a standard (hopefully J1772) and strengthens considerably, EVs are city cars that can, a little painfully, be taken cross country.
I keep forgetting that in the US, you use 110V. In Oz, we use 240V, so it is as if our current is double yours.
I think "miles" and "model year" are the de facto lifespan-ometers of a car, used in the first, say, five years, to calculate depreciation, and after that to estimate reliability/cost-to-repair-vs-new and finally time-until-scrap.I've wondered what that means for BEVs, and whether or not insurance companies are updating their actuary tables.
Aside from wear and tear on suspension, what does "putting miles on" a BEV really mean? The batteries will eventually degrade, but that's nothing compared to the stresses of the constant tiny explosions and unpredictable fluid conditions of ICE vehicles.
Yeah, but those metrics are kind of inappropriate for BEVs. Especially now with all the high tech features going in, it's becoming more like comparing models of computers. Diesel engines, as a counterpoint, are usually measured in hours of runtime instead of miles. With an electric motor the degradation of the battery pack is going to be the only real issue. There are generally few rubbing bits in an electric motor.I think "miles" and "model year" are the de facto lifespan-ometers of a car, used in the first, say, five years, to calculate depreciation
I think "miles" and "model year" are the de facto lifespan-ometers of a car, used in the first, say, five years, to calculate depreciation, and after that to estimate reliability/cost-to-repair-vs-new and finally time-until-scrap.
I, too, have wondered about the million-mile-Teslas (and other BEVs) and their impact on the life cycle of cars.
Agreed. I like my cars under 100K, just because I like all the little things to work. At 12K a year or so, an 8 year old car begins to break them pretty regularly.I believe the million mile Tesla is Hyperbole. Every car I ever owned was retired because of cosmetic wear issues and not mileage (most had 200k on the clock and ran perfectly). But when the bumpers are faded, headlights are hazy, carpet is worn, trim is faded and the car just looks old, you don't put 5k of work into a 12year old car with a 5k book value.
Unless it's a Tesla used for business with some unusual mileage demands, they will all suffer the same result as my previous cars. But... we already have examples of Teslas used for business needing more than one batter replacement to make it to 400k
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk