Recently Tesla put out a video for its Start program where it would pair with community colleges. In that video the presenter talks about a projection of 25% BEVs by 2030 and it seems that this is a video presented by Tesla itself as it shows branded shirts and this is a program to train its technicians.
But that estimate is totally absolutely pathetic, 25% by 2030 is beyond horrid, tragic and pathetic,- only 25% in 12 years time. That's as criminal as VW's utter bull sht, 15% by 2025. We should be able to jail the exes and even the share holders (hows that for corporate vale breaching?) over this kind of BS. But there it is the projection based on total and utter corruption- so it remains to be seen if Tesla actually thinks this too or if this was just some paid shilling that someone thought Tesla would over look. Its in line with some BS predictions by the Trump admin, but what would Tesla parrot that **** unless it was being forced to?
The other one that was disappointing and may support the above suspicion is Musk seems to have decreased his take on roof top solar and increased his take on utility scale solar such that both now have roughly 33% shares in his estimate of what it will take. He has noted this is because of heating and automotive and residential and industrial power, but it seems to be going backwards and I don't get it really except maybe it plays to Tesla's storage business and speed of response to carbon.
There is one more bridge that Tesla must cross and that is with a better garage charging mechanism. Kind of hoping they will consider at least the option of the witricity or wireless charging option if they feel they can spare the slight difference in charging efficiency. You have to go roof top solar to batter in garage to electric but you need that convenient coupler to make it a truly trouble free life style. That is another bridge I know they recognize they must cross. Have a cable even in snake charger still means doing something verticle with a thick cable and that's not the best solution. An embedded horizontal cable would be better.
But that estimate is totally absolutely pathetic, 25% by 2030 is beyond horrid, tragic and pathetic,- only 25% in 12 years time. That's as criminal as VW's utter bull sht, 15% by 2025. We should be able to jail the exes and even the share holders (hows that for corporate vale breaching?) over this kind of BS. But there it is the projection based on total and utter corruption- so it remains to be seen if Tesla actually thinks this too or if this was just some paid shilling that someone thought Tesla would over look. Its in line with some BS predictions by the Trump admin, but what would Tesla parrot that **** unless it was being forced to?
The other one that was disappointing and may support the above suspicion is Musk seems to have decreased his take on roof top solar and increased his take on utility scale solar such that both now have roughly 33% shares in his estimate of what it will take. He has noted this is because of heating and automotive and residential and industrial power, but it seems to be going backwards and I don't get it really except maybe it plays to Tesla's storage business and speed of response to carbon.
There is one more bridge that Tesla must cross and that is with a better garage charging mechanism. Kind of hoping they will consider at least the option of the witricity or wireless charging option if they feel they can spare the slight difference in charging efficiency. You have to go roof top solar to batter in garage to electric but you need that convenient coupler to make it a truly trouble free life style. That is another bridge I know they recognize they must cross. Have a cable even in snake charger still means doing something verticle with a thick cable and that's not the best solution. An embedded horizontal cable would be better.