This may sound contrarian, but I can assure you it’s not. Does anyone know if there is an ambient temp below which the Lo setting will actually turn on the heat? This has a practical implication for me as I rarely use the heat during the N.C. “winter”
Totally fine; I know I'm being contrarian too

For me, one of 2 things would be all I need -- having the "AC" control as a physical button with lighted indicator, as it is on most other cars I've owned, or having separate "Heat" and "Cool" temperatures that I could leave alone. When it's say 65 in the morning I don't want the car blasting the expensive electric heat to get to 70 (don't even heat our house that much), and if I spin the temp down I don't want it using AC to cool it down; I just want fresh air. I'd probably set Cool to 70 and Heat to 55-60. When I get a chance I'll start a new thread on this, as it's diverging a bit from the OP's issue and I'm looking forward to learning better ways to use/live with it!
In a car like this where we're a bit obsessed about exact energy consumption (every post that compares GOM numbers) because the EV range is close to our daily use (which is fine, that's why I bought it because it's a pretty close optimization), knowing when and how much energy heat and AC are consuming is useful. For example, we know EV range goes down when it's cold -- how much of that is due to inherent battery usage characteristics at temperature (which we can't control much) and how much due to using increasing amounts of cabin heat the colder it gets (which we have some control over by dressing more warmly, wearing gloves, using seat heater etc more with cabin heat set lower/off, optimizing which part of the trip uses the engine thus generating heat there if going beyond range anyway, etc).