Most major US cities have variations of this policy already and have for several years now. This isn't creating any meaningful demand for EVs because it only benefits a small segment of the US driving population. Yes its cheaper to install during construction, but most apartments that will be around when EVs make up more than half of car sales already exist - in short, this benefit is relatively small.
The largest segment of the US driving population live in single family homes where they have access to charging over night. They aren't buying EVs in droves because they can't effectively drive everywhere they want to because of the lack of DC FC.
Tesla superchargers have greater coverage than CCS and I would argue that a big portion of Tesla's car sales come from this fact alone.
Like I said earlier, most major US cities already have variations of this policy, but the rest of the US cities essentially don't and changing that would require a ton of time, energy, and resources to change for meager benefits - especially when you consider the fact that the DC FC coverage issue affects apartment dwellers too.
It makes far more sense to expand the DC FC infrastructure because it drives demand. Increasing EV demand in general is the quickest way to get more apartment owners to put in chargers. Getting more DC FC is the quickest way to increasing demand because model availability, range, and cost (I think) issues will be addressed in the next few years
Will it be necessary for all apartments to
Revit quantity takeoff services have charging access in the future? Probably yes, but it doesn't make sense to pursue an inefficient way to increase EV demand to make it happen.
