'BEV emissions' is pure FUD

  • Thread starter Thread starter 101101
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 1
  • Views Views 765

101101

Well-Known Member
First, no tail pipe. Then we are supposed to believe that 1khw of battery takes 100lbs of co2 at a minimum to manufacture- sometimes 4.5x as much? Utter bs because it can be done with green energy for very close to zero emissions for much cheaper. This isn't difference of opinion stuff, every time the FF industry pays to lie to the public about the public interest there should be a retraction a huge fine for FF firm and the publisher and that publisher should have to publish the names of the people who paid and were paid to lie to the public about the public interest as a condition of keeping its charter, and there should be a criminal investitgation. Its not speech quelling its speech protecting.

I saw something that said Model 3 has 64% less emissions than a Mercedes S. What utter bs. This was an attempt to try to say the Mercedes S is clean or the emissions difference with a Mercedes S is nominal. Absolutely not the case. It would be like saying light cigarettes are good for you. That Mecedes S class over its life will directly emmit 20x its weight in CO2 so 100klbs and another 1/3 in cracking the fuel so 130klbs. Its enough to take the air in 13 superbowl stadiums to above 1000ppm and put 1.3 million people to sleep. This idea that BEVa are dirty because companies are still using sht FF to spend way too much making them is such laughable nonsense. FF is dirty and unnecessary and increasingly illegal period!
 
No kidding, in fact since I mostly use EvGo, which uses 100% clean energy, I really.dont have any emissions. But even most of the free chargers I occasionally use when not using EvGo are solar powered.
 
Back
Top