HondaLink/Telematics Are Free For A Reason-Should We Be Okay With That??

I don't have a problem with this.

 

No problem for me either since I always have my phone in the car and I’m just a court ordered search warrant away from having all my GPS data made public. Also with cameras at more and more intersections and license plate grabbing software, privacy is becoming a thing of the past.

 

After few days of purchase we got a mail by post that had an option to opt out of some data sharing. Conveniently this option could only be exercised via post, and not online. I did opt out of all item they would allow.

Regarding telematics, yes its lousy, perhaps disable wifi in the car. No more reporting of anything to you or Honda, same as older gas cars.

 

If anyone can make a viable argument about how that information could realistically be used to harm me, to a greater degree than the day-to-day benefits I get from the the service it provides, I would start to worry about it.

 

Since the car communicates by cellular packet data, I don’t think disabling WiFi will do you any good.

 

And it’s not just Honda. Our Ford, Subaru, and Toyota all have the same “agreements”. In some cases opting out of data sharing eliminates the features. Toyota Entunes is an example. I haven’t completely gone through the gobbledygook yet, but I believe Apple CarPlay has its own agreements just as all-encompassing and to add to the complications, I also believe there is language for that software to the effect that Honda doesn’t warranty it won’t cause problems.

As I see it at the moment (and this could change), the real problem with the connectivity is not so much privacy as it is bad people hacking into the car’s operation. Given how stunningly incompetent some of the telematics have been in some vehicles, I can’t imagine car companies being very effective at anti-hacking.

 

If you have problem with that, you should just ditch your Android phone and don't use the Chrome browser, Google is the king in collecting everything about you, though others are doing as well.

 

Probably allows Honda to stream ads to your display if they wanted to. You've already noticed enlarged icons on the Garmin nav interface that is the result of payments made to Garmin/Honda to promote certain commercial enterprises above others.

 

Don’t have an issue with those parameters. Look what Tesla has done with their pooling and sharing of data. Of course, it would be fantastic if we could access that data, get feedback, trip maps and a host of other features (how we compare with other drivers in similar situations). My guess is that even Honda’s not using the data but just covering themselves legally as we certainly have to put up with inaccurate odometer readings and a host of other discrepancies we can’t correct.


Sent from my iPad using Inside EVs

 

As per Honda's website
"Only vehicles purchased in the US and Canada have the ability to share data with Honda. You may contact your Honda Clarity authorized dealer to assist you with the cancellation procedures. You can also cancel services and turn off vehicle data uploads using the ‘HondaLink’ mobile app." I could not find this feature on the HondaLink mobile app.

 

I could not find any reference which indicates that the Car has a built in cell (LTE). I have also not seen any references to HondaLink subscription any where.

 

If the telematics unit didn't have cellular data, it couldn't communicate with the Honda cloud and update your HondaLink app when you are away from your car.
Open Wi-Fi would not work reliably enough for Honda or it's owners.
Yeah, it's a privacy issue, but it Honda wants to know where I drive and charge every day, I'm OK with that.
I had to sign a disclaimer for our Fit EV 5 years ago that Honda could listen to the internal mic for the voice commands and that my conversations weren't private.
I don't think my conversations are that interesting that anyone would save them.
In my house, maybe not so much.
If I can opt out without losing any features, I would go for it, though.

 

You can prove this to yourself by parking the car in an area that has no cellular service signal. Then take your phone to an area that does and you’ll find it won’t be able to communicate with the car. Also, you can google TCU. Honda either chose a TCU that does not have voice capability (like GM OnStar) or decided not to activate it. Personally I like the free Honda Link features and would not want to pay for the concierge features of OnStar.

You are correct in that Honda has no written or web based information that indicates that the Clarity will ever need a paid subscription for Honda Link. This is why we are assuming that it will be free for life. If Honda ever tries to start charging and not grandfather us in, then based on that fact I would think it would be time for a class action lawsuit.

 

Back in the day I would have cared, but not anymore. It's hopeless to stay anonymous anymore. Also the benefits to me are greater than the risks. Like the car reporting to 911 if you wreck it. It could save my life one day.

I'm more concerned about unauthorized access and hacking into the car. Like I saw it "appears" to be possible to install Android app APKs in the app section, but I'd never do that because it just opens it up for more third party access. I also read posts elsewhere of how to root the headend unit so you can turn on the ability to use the apps and Google Chrome while driving ... and I saw a video of someone driving the Clarity while watching videos on Youtube. That's REALLY insane risk to do with a car (let alone the stupidity of watching video while driving). I would hope the app section of that headend is sandboxed correctly and away from the ability to control operations of the car, but it's still not a comforting thought.

 

Looks like sharing of your driving habits with your insurance company are one option:
https://www.verisk.com/press-releases/2017/december/honda-joins-the-verisk-data-exchange/

 

I don't think the information Honda is gathering will be used to reveal my affairs with porn stars and Playboy bunnies, so I'm OK with it ; )

 

So Hondalink subscription is free. Good, I just bought a level 2 charger without wifi due to lower price. The only thing I care about the wifi is charging status. So I can get that from Hondalink. It's not real time, but I can live with it.

 

Interesting dichotomy of opinions. I’ll have to say this about Honda. At least they’re not charging $300 a year or more (as Jeep/Chrysler, MB, and others do) with the same boiler plate terms of agreement. On the other hand it would be nice to have access to all of the data and plug that back into improving their product like Tesla and some of the other companies and apps do.
Here’s the thing that’s conflicting in all of this privacy debate. Total transparency is 100% security. Total privacy I is very, very risky. I would venture that more bad behavior occurs in the dark than in the light. What’s even worse is that it doesn’t matter if we want to cloak ourselves in privacy ... just purchasing a car and having an address will enable anybody that wants to to fill in all the blanks with average data from others who share the few demographics we can’t avoid sharing no matter how wildly wrong they are. I’d rather stamp me we the right facts than the wrong ones as the wrong ones have the potential to cause much more damage than correct ones.
So I do like the fact Honda provides their mediocre app for free and hope there’s enough gain for them to make the enhancements that I’d like but for which I wouldn’t pay. Needless to say I didn’t extend the use of the Jeep/Chrysler UConnect nor the Mercedes Benz apps once the free period expired after purchasing those vehicles in the past.

 

I am ok with it.