Ford makes deal with Tesla to share its Supercharger network

Discussion in 'General' started by Domenick, May 25, 2023.

To remove this ad click here.

  1. Nice job...that puts a real perspective on the actual physical size (side by side comparisons).
    I remember when I made the switch from CHAdeMO to CCS and how much less bulky (weight wise) also easier to connect (w/out the need for mechanical interlock) the latter was, this is a whole new level;)
     
    Last edited: Jun 10, 2023
    Domenick and bwilson4web like this.
  2. To remove this ad click here.

  3. And then this happened.:cool:
     
  4. bwilson4web

    bwilson4web Well-Known Member Subscriber

    In General Electric, we used to ask "What is your value added engineering?"

    So far, CharIN's engineering contributions escape me. Can anyone cite them?

    Bob Wilson
     
    Keith Smith likes this.
  5. hobbit

    hobbit Well-Known Member

    They were trying to spec for every possible combination of V2X, grid integration, keeping the J1772 component
    unmodified, wrap network security around it, yadda yadda. It's not clear to me that the data side of whatever
    develops out of NACS intends to include all that, but it's also not clear that anyone *needs* to. Basic "plug-out"
    capability, e.g. bidirectional power flow governed by some simple data commands between a car and another device,
    would be amply sufficient. Put any additional complexity upstream of that, not at the charging port in whatever
    physical form it takes.

    I just ran across a long reddit thread that's worth grinding through...
    . https://old.reddit.com/r/electricvehicles/comments/145ebgo/
    people do tend to blur the distinction between physical connector and data protocol. Perhaps we
    should speak of CCS vs NACS, and CAN vs "ISO" to keep 15118-xx shorter.

    _H*
     
    Last edited: Jun 13, 2023
    Keith Smith likes this.
  6. I just got back from a 3,000 mile roundtrip road trip from PA to TX with about another 1,200 miles in Texas. I had very few charging problems with the various CCS charging networks. Once, I had to call EA to get a station reset and then I could charge. There were a few where one or two of 6 or so stations were offline. Overall, I was pleased with the availability and usability of the charging networks. I used a few L2 charge stations and my slow 120v EVSE at my Aunt's house.

    2022 Kia Niro EV EX - CCS (USA)

    Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
     
  7. To remove this ad click here.

  8. hobbit

    hobbit Well-Known Member

    Continuing to explore the ramifications of this ... apparently Ford and Rivian intend to hand out NACS --> CCS adapters
    to their existing CCS customers. Immediate question: they're likely to OEM those from some third party, so who's
    it likely to be? And how many stories will we see of janky adapters melted and burning when someone tries to
    shove 300 amps through them?

    Does Tesla make the adapter piece for Magic Dock? Would they sell that piece to the general public, I wonder..

    _H*
     
  9. Tesla doesn't currently sell a CCS to NACS adaptor. It has the NACS to CCS only. I'm not positive, but I highly suspect Tesla makes the MagicDock adaptors.
    OEMs don't always get it right, but hopefully they'll put more than enough due diligence into parts like this. A few fires can really put a hurt on an automaker.
     
  10. Keith Smith

    Keith Smith Active Member

    And the CCS plug is a horrid mess designed by committee for J-1772 backward compatibility.
     
  11. Keith Smith

    Keith Smith Active Member

    I think your indictment against tesla is silly, and insulting Elon Musk does not a technical argument make. Tesla published the electrical specs for their plug, so pretty much anyone can add a "pump handle" to their DC units with a Tesla plug. The big problem with DC charging is getting enough juice to the box on the pedestal, not the plastic plug on the end of the cable. The difference for the electronics to control things is trivial, so once you have an 800v/400v/XXXv DC rail in your box you can tap the difficult part is over. The arrogance of the consortium promoting CCS not with-standing, the above pictures are precisely why I think we need to jump on NACS... I own a NiroEV, and a KonaEV, and I can tell you standing outside plugging in that awful clunky CCS connector in the freezing rain in Show-Low on the slick pavement was definitely not fun.
     
    bwilson4web likes this.
  12. To remove this ad click here.

  13. Polestar follows suit:
    Polestar will adopt North American Charging Standard to enable access to Tesla Supercharger network in USA and Canada - Polestar United States Media Newsroom
    Same as Volvo, NACS to CCS adaptors to be supplied for existing EVs and CCS to NACS adaptors provide with the 2025 NACS equipped vehicles.
    I am hoping the Tesla API software will be included in the vehicle (same as Volvo), so the ability to supercharge does not require an app run on a smartphone (ie car is recognized by the charger). Payment could be handled simply by topping up a credit account on a PC , either Tesla or through Polestar (or whatever manufacture vehicle) - basically the same as using an RFID account with ChargePoint for example.;)
     
    Last edited: Jun 29, 2023
    Domenick likes this.
  14. electriceddy likes this.
  15. Seeing as EA is owned by Volkswagen Group of America, it would stand to reason they would follow up with the same charging connector in their EVs.
    Edit: within one hour after the EA announcement
    "Within an hour of the Electrify America and Electrify Canada announcements this morning, parent company VW confirmed it is in discussions with Tesla to also adopt NACS.
    If VW does go with NACS, they would become the third European automaker to do so, following Volvo and Polestar. That is of course unless someone else beats them to it, as we have learned a major German automaker is finalizing their deal with Tesla and an announcement should be coming in the next few days.";)
    HMG would be left out in the cold if they didn't follow, especially considering all the new U.S. investments.
     
    Last edited: Jun 29, 2023
    Domenick likes this.
  16. hobbit

    hobbit Well-Known Member

    Why does any given automaker have to strike a "deal" with Tesla to let their products use superchargers?
    That's not serving the public in an equitable way. Any CCS car whose owner can deal with Tesla's effed-up
    payment structure and has an appropriate adapter (soon) should be able to roll up and charge.

    This continued exclusionist BS on several fronts is really holding the entire industry back far more than
    is remotely warranted.

    _H*
     
  17. bwilson4web

    bwilson4web Well-Known Member Subscriber

    They, the automakers, don't have to "deal" with Tesla. They could double the amount of time and money spent fixing the CCS-1 networks. You know, 2 * $0, and leave the CCS-1 customers with what they have today with their customers' EVs.

    Tesla takes ICE, diesel, hybrids, PHEVs, and other EVs as trade-ins. For example, trade-in of my former 2017 Prius Prime brought my 2019 Tesla Model 3 Std Rng Plus down to $24,000. I financed the rest through my bank and paid it off early to avoid insurance comprehensive costs.

    Bob Wilson
     
    Last edited: Jun 30, 2023
  18. marshall

    marshall Well-Known Member

    I thought the Chinese company Greely owned Volvo and Polestar. As such, are they really an European automaker?
     
    insightman and bwilson4web like this.
  19. marshall

    marshall Well-Known Member

    Because Tesla built, owns and maintains these superchargers.

    Plus according to what I've read, Mary stated that Tesla would be charging the same price to charge for non-Tesla owners. If that's not to the greater good, then I guess I don't understand what the greater good means. That's a sweet deal for non-Tesla owners.
     
  20. Puppethead

    Puppethead Well-Known Member

    There seems to be a tendency to conflate the NACS plug with the Tesla supercharger network. Adopting the NACS plug should be independent from Tesla, especially now that SAE is standardizing it. But the supercharger network is a Tesla service that they have every right to make money from, and if other car makers want to make deals to give their car buyers access that's normal business. A number of EV makers have deals to offer free charging at EA locations (see list of incentives near end of article).
     
  21. Keith Smith

    Keith Smith Active Member

    This seems like flame bait. Either that or a total lack of understanding of how business works. Now that EA ( as I predicted in another post, about wanting to make money ) is going to add a 'NACS' pump handle on their electron pumps, the question becomes time & effort. Without spending grotesque amounts of capital, the charging companies cannot just run to every station and retrofit their pumps with the new handles. I use the gasoline pump jargon because the same evolution occured with the shift to unleaded gasoline. In the liquid fuel case the pumps had to be completely replaced or added independently to accommodate extra piping and storage tanks. Even though swapping some components and adding a cable is not as disruptive, it still takes more than a modicum of time and effort. While waiting for that to actually occur, automakers want to assure the people buying their vehicles that they have access to and adequate supply of 'electron pumps' if they want to travel. They also want to have promotions like 'free charging for a year' so in order to do that they have to strike a "deal" with whomever can service the request. If you put a NACS socket on the car, your service provider should really have NACS plugs. For now that's Tesla, but I'd guess within 2-3 years as the number of NACS plugs begins to proliferate on other networks, "deals" will be made with other providers, who want the money. It's called competition.

    IMNSHO, EA is by far the most robust (nationwide) of all the non-Tesla networks. Their adoption of the NACS plug at their stations will likely be the proverbial hole that broke open the dam. This will force the rest of the industry to also install the plugs, which in turn will have the rest vehicle manufacturers adopting the plug because it is the most widely available, and people don't want to buy something "they can't find fuel for".

    If Tesla doesn't clean up their billing/charging systems, they will rapidly find people will flood to alternatives as they become available. That being said, two years ago when I first got my EV, most of the billing systems and software were somewhere between abysmal, and awful for all the networks. Driving up to EVgo stations in the phoenix area, you had about a 30% chance you could actually use the system. I signed up to get a charge one time, because the card reader didn't work, and EVgo somehow enrolled me for monthly service. A few months later the card was compromised and replaced, and now two YEARS later, they (EVgo) has sent me to a collection agency for $30 because I failed to cancel the subscription I was unaware I even had. They got about $100 out of me for nothing already billing my card for a few months.

    The last road trip I took in February Phoenix -Albuquerque this year was actually fine. There is a new EA station in Payson, which was down according to plugshare, so I went up thru Show-Low instead. The stations were all fully functional, and spaced close enough I had no range anxiety. I ran into a couple of Tesla's at the EA stations using CCS adapters. When I asked why, they said it was just more convenient for the path they wanted to travel. You don't need as many fast chargers as you do gas stations. They really just need to be scattered every 50 or so miles along the major routes, with a handful in town. If you can't plug in at home overnight for your day-to-day needs you probably shouldn't be driving an electric anyway.
     
    insightman and bwilson4web like this.
  22. bwilson4web

    bwilson4web Well-Known Member Subscriber

    I’ve know @hobbit since our Prius days and he is one of the more creative and active Prius and now EV engineers around.

    I have long admired his well documented projects. We’ve not always agreed but good engineering means understanding alternate solutions and testing.

    Bob Wilson
     

Share This Page