As the title states, combined range is 110 (117 City, 102 Hwy)
MPGe is 108
https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find.do?action=sbs&id=42508
MPGe is 108
https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find.do?action=sbs&id=42508
I followed your link and found different City/Highway ranges (but the same 110 mile total range and 108 MPGe). Did they change it today?As the title states, combined range is 110 (117 City, 102 Hwy)
MPGe is 108
https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find.do?action=sbs&id=42508
EPA Application:
https://iaspub.epa.gov/otaqpub/display_file.jsp?docid=48730&flag=1
349V, 93.2 Ah battery
Calculated capacity of 32.5 kWh matches the reported 32.6 within rounding errors
Reported usable capacity has been 28.9 kWh, but it took 34.3 kWh to recharge on both the UDDS (city) and Highway test cycles. This would equate to an 84% charging efficiency which is very low indeed.
Test data indicates a average voltage of 362, and 83.6 Ah used, which would equate to ~30.25 kWh usable. That would put it at ~88% efficiency which is on the low side of most test data, but not out of range.
They do indicate 230V used while charging, but that shouldn't impact efficiency
I believe the usable capacity is a bit more than the reported 28.9 kWh
Thanks for having better reading skills than me. Did you calculate the city/hwy range numbers?Those aren't ranges, those are MPGe for city/hwy tests (something they think is more important for consumers to know than range apparently)
Years of seeing people look at the Monroney at shows and confuse MPGe with range. Many were shocked that the Bolt was rated for only 118 when they heard it was supposed to be over 200. Most buyers are much more concerned with range than relative efficiency, but the label requirements highlight MPGe.Thanks for having better reading skills than me. Did you calculate the city/hwy range numbers?
Label ranges are 70% of tested results to better reflect real world averages. (Sometimes a manufacturer will voluntarily lower them further)Whoa, the testers' Actual Distance Driven was 166.967 miles (or was that "drive" on a dynamometer?):
Sorry to be such a pain, but I can't find the MINI Cooper SE in that table. Can you tell me what row it's in?Compiled test data:
https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/epadata/20data.zip
Thanks so much! I kept searching the main page instead of looking for the EV tab.32, 33, 34
Make sure and select the "20 EVs" sheet from the tabs at the bottom
Other MINI Coopers can have ACC, why not include it as part of the top "Iconic" trim package?Car & Driver wrote: "The only common option that's conspicuously absent across the board is adaptive cruise control."
That's what happens to fun-to-drive cars. Are you always fully charging your MINI Electric at this point? Can you fit your professional tools into the MINI?We already have 500 miles on our SE.