Bob is an engineer who has posted many technical info to this forum, which is much appreciated by me, and I presume by others. He's even paid to attend one of Sandy Munro's automotive engineering conferences, to hear Sandy and others talk about and display what they have learned about various BEVs in their teardowns of the Model 3, the BMW i3, and the Chevy Bolt.
I know many engineers (had some that used to work for me) and know very well how their minds work (not all the same of course). They sometimes tend to not see the forest for the trees, and can get lost in the weeds. They are very analytic, but sometimes need help to determine how to best weigh and utilize the information. Bob sounds very typical to me.
If you think Bob or his posts are "just not that smart", then I'd say that's much more of a barometer of your ability to judge than any measure of Bob and his knowledge of EVs.
What I mean there is that he is very selective with his info and fails to acknowledge ANY deficiencies (that I have pointed out) in his M3. That tells me his arrogance over rides his intelligence if the thinks that is not blatantly obvious. To me, that is not very smart, more juvenile actually.
Everyone is of course entitled to his or her opinion, but that comes across as more than moderately biased to me. I have seen literally no reviews of the TM3 that complain about uncomfortable front seats; not a single one. Now, if you mean the rear seats, then you should have specified that. There have been a lot of complaints about uncomfortable rear seats, altho Tesla has improved the padding back there.
You do, however, have a valid point about lack of perforations in the leather or faux leather seats. That's a complaint I've seen elsewhere, and I don't understand why Tesla would cheap out on that.
And no ventilation. Sweaty butts can be very uncomfortable. Hard to believe this is missing in a car at this price. Even my son (who still loves his M3) complains about the seats.
Also, there is a rather large difference in quality between a "spartan but elegant" interior, and "very plain, cheap looking" one. The latter description appears to me to be going beyond subjective opinion, and into the realm of bias or even deliberate bashing.