I listed completed sales where the seller and buyer agreed on the price. At a minimum, they should be at least $7,500 lower since there is no Federal Tax Credit and even more if there were other incentives. Ebay completed sales:
- $145,000 - 2016 Model S P100D, 19,200 mi
- $125,000 - 2017 Model X, 14,500 mi
- $118,000 - 2017 Model X P100D, 12,700 mi
- $114,444 - 2017 Model X P100D, 9,746 mi
- $103,950 - 2016 Model X P90D, 15,670 mi (* relisted)
- $100,400 - 2016 Model S P100D, 15,000 mi (best offer)
- $99,999 - 2016 Model S P100D, 25,060 mi (best offer)
- $88,900 - 2016 Model X, 15,966 mi
- $85,200 - 2016 Model X, 26,906 mi
- $85,100 - 2016 Model X, 15,700 mi
- $84,998 - 2016 Model S P90D, 10,561 mi
- $81,500 - 2017 Model S 90D, 7,500 mi
- $80,900 - 2016 Model S P90D, 17,767 mi
- . . .
Given the arrival of the Model 3, ~$57,000, in substantial numbers, the prices of used Teslas should soften. But if you want a larger, more luxurious Tesla, the X/S are the only option shipping in quantity. So how does this compare if you don't have a pre-Model 3 sample?
In May 2016 I bought an end-of-lease, 2014 BMW i3-REx:
- Monroney sticker $53,000, 0 miles
- Used price, $29,000, 6,330 miles, 55% of the original price
My BMW example suggests the listed Tesla, new prices should have been nearly twice their Ebay completed price. Instead, it looks like the Tesla are much slower depreciating than what my BMW i3-REx went through.
Bob Wilson