Bloomberg Model 3 tracker shows production crashing below 1000/week

This sort of thing makes me suspect that Russian troll farms are at play here. There are plenty of reasons for Russia to hate Tesla. Perhaps the most important of those is that Russia's economy is so dependent on selling fossil fuel, and Tesla is doing more than any other company to reduce or end our dependence on fossil fuels.
PP,
Привет, друг, как дела? Поднимите человека! Все, что я написал, правильно. Вы не может показать один элемент, который является неправильным. Поэтому вы прибегаете к призыву!
 
Last edited:
PP,
Привет, друг, как дела? Поднимите человека! Все, что я написал, правильно. Вы cannotshow один элемент, который является неправильным. Поэтому вы прибегаете к призыву!
Не настоящий друг. Ваша пропаганда не имеет никакого эффекта. Вы уже сыграли свою руку и показали, что вы сосете Путина.

Bob Wilson
 
Не настоящий друг. Ваша пропаганда не имеет никакого эффекта. Вы уже сыграли свою руку и показали, что вы сосете Путина.

Bob Wilson
И ты сосать элон мускуса? ха-ха.
 
I know you aren't being a "negative Nellie," and that this is your honest assessment, and I certainly know the scenario I outlined is (probably too) optimistic since the company is often behind/short on its targets. I pulled up March figures this morning, the first link I saw, and Camry was at 24,xxx, while its competitors were lower. Just now I've checked May's numbers and they are higher (Camry did 29,848 in May).

So, I don't see Model 3 hitting 35k a month for a while -- probably not this year. If it can get up to 21.4K, that's certainly approaching the neighbourhood of the top selling sedans.

They'll get production there eventually. I think the bigger challenge may be sustaining that sort of demand once it does. It's a declining segment overall, and I think the Kona, and any number of other electric crossovers are going to eat into its market share. Though, then again, it remains to be seen what kind of numbers the competition is capable of producing as well. They seem to be having a hard time keeping up with demand at this point. Them it becomes a tale of supply chain.

Totally agree with you, the sedan market is dying... People who want EV's line up for Tesla because there are no other compelling options (GM blew it on the Bolt styling and interior), but when Kona and others get out, I feel there will hit Tesla's model 3 backlog hard. Kona is just a more useful vehicle. I also think the model 3 P will be a flop 10K or so max demand, not too many people want a car like that at the same price as an I-Pace loaded with family features
 
Totally agree with you, the sedan market is dying... People who want EV's line up for Tesla because there are no other compelling options (GM blew it on the Bolt styling and interior), but when Kona and others get out, I feel there will hit Tesla's model 3 backlog hard. Kona is just a more useful vehicle. I also think the model 3 P will be a flop 10K or so max demand, not too many people want a car like that at the same price as an I-Pace loaded with family features
Well, I think the Model 3 can still have a decent enough demand, especially if it can take some market share from the Camry, Accord and Altima. It's one of those things, though. Time will tell.
 
Well, I think the Model 3 can still have a decent enough demand, especially if it can take some market share from the Camry, Accord and Altima. It's one of those things, though. Time will tell.


Yes, time will tell... The bulk of the market cannot afford a 45K car... also in a couple quarters Tesla is going to have a huge tax rebate disadvantage in the USA... thats really going to hurt on the lower end. with Kona, and others coming on with full rebates. And Merc, Jag, Audi, and others are going to exploit that on the high end..
 
PP,
Привет, друг, как дела? Поднимите человека! Все, что я написал, правильно. Вы не может показать один элемент, который является неправильным. Поэтому вы прибегаете к призыву!

Ya ne govoryu po-russki.
 
Speaking of Model 3 ramp up:
https://www.chron.com/business/article/Loved-by-Elon-Musk-mocked-by-critics-Tesla-s-13023926.php
Elon Musk has six days to make good on his pledge that Tesla will be pumping out 5,000 Model 3 sedans a week by the end of the month. If he succeeds, it may be thanks to the curious structure outside the company's factory. It's a tent the size of two football fields that Musk calls "pretty sweet" and that manufacturing experts deride as, basically, nuts.

"Words fail me. It's insanity," said Sanford C. Bernstein & Co.'s Max Warburton, who benchmarked auto-assembly plants around the world before becoming a financial analyst.
Whether this new line is fully operational is unclear. Company officials declined to comment
"The existing line isn't functional, it can't build cars as planned and there isn't room to get people into work stations to replace the non-functioning robots," Warburton said in an email. "So here we have it-build cars manually in the parking lot."

What a circus. As if producing an extrapolated 5000 cars/week for an hour or two is supposed to mean anything.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Given the mild climate of Fremont CA, I don't see a problem. As long as it is dry with reasonable temperature control, go for it.

Bob Wilson
 
Teslainvestors quoted:

"The existing line isn't functional, it can't build cars as planned and there isn't room to get people into work stations to replace the non-functioning robots," Warburton said in an email. "So here we have it-build cars manually in the parking lot."​

Everybody is just speculating here, but Warburton seems to be going out of his way to make ridiculous Tesla bashing assertions, which of course is the reason Teslainvestor would quote that.

I would guess Nix was correct in his comment about the subject, in saying what is being done in the tent is probably just the final post-painting assembly work which is mostly done by hand anyway. The idea that Tesla would put an entire start-to-finish production line in a tent is rather implausible. As has been pointed out by HVACman, the tent would lack humidity control or stable temperature, would not have a trunk line of electrical power or lighting, and would not provide the sort of "clean room" needed for some assembly work. It has also been noted that there isn't any fire suppression system in the tent.

The idea that putting an assembly line in a tent is the future of manufacturing... No. Just no.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...-teslas-model-3-building-sprint-idUSKBN1JT0CQ

Just one tidbit out of many.
Whether Tesla can do it week in and week out - and without relying on overtime and extra hands - is another question, and one that weighed on investors.

Shares closed down 7.2 percent at $310.86 on Tuesday.

Leading up to Sunday morning’s production milestone, Musk paced the Model 3 line, snapping at his engineers when the around-the-clock production slowed or stopped due to problems with robots, one worker said.
 
I think there's little doubt they can't do 5,000 a week for now, but they should be there in a month-and-a-half, I suspect. They need to hit 6,000 in late August of early September. Pretty sizable correction today. Probably a little too much. I think it'll edge back up to $320ish, though one never knows with this stock, it could go below $280 again and sucker more short action.
If they can show a profit at the end of September, then it'll likely be back up to $350 or higher. Crazy stuff.
 
It sounds like Tesla needs another tent. Also, the extra $2,500 to place an order suggests cash-flow needed for labor and materials. As for hours, I've been through two spacecraft mission launches and we had a 'crash room' with folding beds. I preferred to sleep in the car weather permitting.

When under a hard deadline, there will be problems with subject matter experts huddled around the problem area. An operating system programmer, I was the 'last resort' because my problems were where the hardware met the software. The integration and test team had me on speed-dial. The application software teams were . . . less enthusiastic.

Bob Wilson
 
I think there's little doubt they can't do 5,000 a week for now, but they should be there in a month-and-a-half, I suspect.

That looks like a reasonable guesstimate. Based on history, I do think it's going to take more than a month to build up to doing 5000 per week as an average for an entire month, or rather a four-week period.
 
That looks like a reasonable guesstimate. Based on history, I do think it's going to take more than a month to build up to doing 5000 per week as an average for an entire month, or rather a four-week period.
This benchmark will also give Tesla insights to what their suppliers need to do. Some like sheet metal and tires will scale quickly. There may be more trouble getting glass and battery chemicals ramped up.

Bob Wilson
 
This benchmark will also give Tesla insights to what their suppliers need to do. Some like sheet metal and tires will scale quickly. There may be more trouble getting glass and battery chemicals ramped up.

Tesla bought a glass factory and said it was going to start making its own automobile window glass. Are they still buying windows and windshields from an outside supplier? It wouldn't surprise me if they are; just curious.

From Electrek, Nov. 2016: "Tesla Model 3 will feature new type of glass developed in-house, Elon Musk confirms ‘Tesla Glass’ tech group"
 
Last edited:
I was speculating about the glass since that is a typical parts supplier product. Elon has worked hard to vertically integrate Tesla (much like Henry Ford) and this no doubt provides more insulation from the 'usual suspects.

Bob Wilson
 
Did I see some IEV article on Bloomberg tracker exceeding 5000 a week? Now it no lnger shows that. So, it goes back and correct the plot retroactively. Interesting.
m3_prod.webp
 
I think the semi-informed guesses were that starting the second week in July, Model 3 production stabilized at about 3500 per week, and of course it has climbed, or will, from there. As has been pointed out many times, the Bloomberg "production tracker" doesn't even pretend to be accurate from week-to-week, but only tries for long-term overall accuracy.

5000 per week was what Tesla almost -- but not quite -- managed to do in the week ending the second quarter. As with every pull-out-the-stops week ending a quarter, Tesla ramped up to an unsustainable production pace, and then immediately after had to take a few days of slack production -- or even a few days off -- for everyone to rest and recuperate.

Personally I wish Tesla would quit this binge-and-purge cycle. But strangely enough, Elon keeps failing to call me up to ask for my personal advice on how he should handle production. He does that every quarter, quite predictably. ;)
 
Back
Top