Mike's wife's monthly Kona EV efficiency report

Discussion in 'Hyundai Kona Electric' started by navguy12, Aug 30, 2020.

To remove this ad click here.

  1. 122 Wh/km accumulated consumption is very respectable, keep up the good driving habits. Anything under 125 really feels rewarding.
    Personally I did achieve similar results:
    https://insideevsforum.com/community/index.php?threads/range-is-increasing.8938/page-2#post-140570
    I think before the summer winds down, that # will get even better.
    We definitely are fortunate to own and drive probably the most efficient BEV for the invested $ even by todays standards.:)
     
    mho, eastpole and navguy12 like this.
  2. To remove this ad click here.

  3. navguy12

    navguy12 Well-Known Member

    It’s all my wife, just driving as she normally does, without worrying about driving economically.

    IMO it is a real testament to the efficiency of this car.
     
    Kirk and electriceddy like this.
  4. Am I understanding correctly? (Math was never my strong suit)

    Your car shows12.2 kwh/100km. Your data shows electricity use as 18.4 kwh/100km. Is the difference just that a lot of juice gets lost somewhere in the charging process?

    If so, my assumption is wrong that I can just multiply what the car shows me by my kwh electricity rate to get my electrical cost. Based on your numbers, I need to bump it up by approximately 50%?

    Or am I just mis-interpreting your numbers?

    Thanks for this - very interesting.
     
    navguy12 likes this.
  5. navguy12

    navguy12 Well-Known Member

    The 12.2 figure is for this month only…and I believe you are pulling the 18.4 (actually 18.023) figure from the lifetime information on my summary page.

    To review this month, the delta between what the car says was used (122 Wh/km) versus what was pulled from the grid (rounded to nearest whole number of 151 Wh/km) was 23%:

    45EE7B97-D770-46ED-8F26-42D2DC230EAD.jpeg

    YMMV, but for the past 12 months of ownership, the figure is 20% (146 Wh/km versus 180 Wh/km).

    Some of the energy is lost in converting from AC to DC…some is lost by the BMS that constantly exercises the 12 volt battery, so it has to be topped up almost continuously…and if the algorithm is the same as my TM3, the Kona EV odometer will not capture any energy used unless the car is in “drive” or “reverse”.

    If the car is parked bu the AC is on full blast, that energy has to come from somewhere and I don’t think the cars odometer captures that.

    As to figuring what you pull from the grid at home so you can figure what your energy spend is on the car versus the rest of your house, the best thing to do is get one of the in-line meters that I use (and re-zero every month).

    Hope that makes sense. :)
     
  6. Thanks - that makes it clear. I'm not detailed enough to get me an in-line meter, but it's really helpful to know when I work out my ICE v. EV savings I need to gross up the car's number by roughly 20%.

    What you say about the energy for AC is interesting. As it happens, our grandson drove my wife to emergency at the hospital this weekend (she's fine) and the poor guy had to spend almost 3 hours in the car waiting on a hot afternoon. I told him to just run the car and keep the AC on, which he did. We were both surprised that the GOM only went down by a few kilometres. If that's because the car doesn't take into account AC drain in computing your remaining (guesstimated) mileage, that doesn't make much practical sense to me. I would have thought the GOM just divides the amount of charge left by how much you used by mileage in some recent amount of driving. Since just using the AC reduces the amount of charge, why would that not reflected in the estimated range left? Or maybe it does, since our remaining mileage did go down a little (less than 10 km) and AC doesn't use as much battery as I would have thought?

    Also, he and I were driving later with the consumption screen up that shows what motor, accessories, etc. are using at the moment. We had AC on and switched to and from "driver only". That only made a very small percentage difference on the screen. Maybe that makes sense since you're still running the AC and just changing how many vents it blows through (I suppose).

    Anyway, just musing about these things and hope I'm not hijacking your thread but I thought this was sort of relevant.
     
    Lars and navguy12 like this.
  7. To remove this ad click here.

  8. navguy12

    navguy12 Well-Known Member

    Cheers.

    I figure you’ll be happy with simply adding the 20% to your odometer readings, “good enough for government work” ;)
     
    Lars likes this.
  9. There are a number of mysteries and unknowns, including the level of efficiency while charging. Still none seems to make a huge difference. By the way I also use the AC if I/we have to wait in the car. It just makes sense to me. Unless of course you are running on "battery fumes" - haha.

    The little pop-ups reminding me not to drain the battery while I am in the car and running the radio etc. puzzle me. I am literally sitting on 60+kW of power in the drive battery. Please Hyundai engineers take care of this for me will you? At least while the drive battery is, say at or above 40-50%. Small thing but annoying.
     
    Kirk and navguy12 like this.
  10. navguy12

    navguy12 Well-Known Member

    This is the one major philosophical difference the Kona has, compared to how my TM3 uses 12 volts under all conditions.

    In that car, whenever the car is woken up (such as opening the door), the system will use the traction battery to continually recharge the 12 volt battery, regardless of whether one is cleaning the interior (doors open/interior lamps on) or parked at some location and listening to the radio, etc...

    The only issue is things like "Dog Mode" or "Sentry Mode" will not operate when the SOC is under 20%.

    The method of powering ancillary 12 volt systems is the only real weakness I see in the Kona.
     
    Lars and electriceddy like this.
  11. Leave the car "on" or shift into "utility" mode. Those are the solutions.
     
    Kirk, Lars, navguy12 and 2 others like this.
  12. To remove this ad click here.

  13. Hyundai have improved the charging algorithm via software update with a previous LDC TSB for early MY built cars, which has carried over to our later models. At least it is variable using these methods, but still I am curious as to what the lower SOC level of the traction pack would be where the car decides to save its remaining energy and disregard the auxiliary battery.
    Wise decision on Tesla's part to limit unnecessary loads at a predetermined pack SOC while also allowing that indication to be known to the user.

    "the LDC controller may set the LDC output voltage and the sub-battery charging time (or LDC operation time charging the sub-battery) according to the SOH of the sub-battery (S14), and then may determine whether or not the SOC of a main battery is sufficient to charge the sub-battery (S16). The information received from the IBS may include the internal temperature of the sub-battery, the SOC, a load resistance value detection, and the voltage."

    Source:https://patents.google.com/patent/US9413182B2/en
     
    mho, Lars and navguy12 like this.
  14. navguy12

    navguy12 Well-Known Member

    Agreed.

    But that extra step on the operator’s part shouldn’t be required (a.k.a a hack).
     
    Lars likes this.
  15. Thanks for the good info! Just shows that Tesla engineers are ahead of thinking in other areas than 0 to 60 as well. ;)
     
    navguy12 likes this.
  16. Yes! And the setting is pretty well 'hidden'. It you don't use it often you have to search for it. Crazy.
     
    Kirk and navguy12 like this.
  17. Wildeyed said:
    Leave the car "on" or shift into "utility" mode. Those are the solutions.
    It's one less step if you don't switch "off" though :)
     
  18. navguy12

    navguy12 Well-Known Member

    Anytime I drive my wife’s Kona, I end up walking away from it about 80% of the time with the thing still “on”…and then she can hear me mutter…
     
    arhnold and electriceddy like this.
  19. navguy12

    navguy12 Well-Known Member

    Aug 2021 results:

    aug2021 raw data.JPG

    aug2021 real upload data.JPG
    aug2021 odometer.JPG
    aug2021 in line meter.JPG
    Summary costs as of 31 Aug 2021:

    aug2021 summary.JPG

    Total operating costs, per km (total costs minus capex costs):

    $8.9658 - $8.4455 = $0.5203/km

    Discussion:

    The first annual routine maintenance was done on 20 Aug 2021 and involved $5.00 of shop supplies (to lubricate the four brake calipers).

    However, the operating costs per km are higher than last month due to the purchase of a (what I log as) "Charging adapter kit", in this case an extension cable that my wife can use solely for her Kona whilst traveling (versus sharing the unit I bought for my TM3 three years ago):

    https://www.evseadapters.com/products/nema-14-50-extension-cord-for-electric-vehicle-only-20-ft/
     
  20. navguy12

    navguy12 Well-Known Member

    The Sep 2021 results will be posted sometime after 03 Oct 2021.
     
  21. Since we share the same dealer I'm just curious if you've heard anything from them about your battery replacement?
     
  22. I believe @navguy12 owns a 21 MY (out of the recall date range);)
     
    navguy12 and Wildeyed like this.
  23. navguy12

    navguy12 Well-Known Member

    This is correct, my wife’s car is outside the recall range.
     

Share This Page