Campaign contributions from Oil and Gas to the fake left:
Hillary Clinton 5M (2016)
Barrack Obama 1.1 M (2008)
Betto O'rourke 500K (2020) most in the house
Bernie Sanders 235K (2020)
Elizebeth Warren 83K (2020)
Ed. Markey 65K recently
Kirsten Gillebrand 25k recent
Amy Klobuchar 64K (2020)
Joseph Biden 27k in (2008)- signed pledge but still taking FF money apparently
Adam Schiff 19K
Alexandria Occassio Cortez 11k (2020)
Lorena Gonzales largest contributor was fossil fuels may have close to 60K
Kamila Harris 6.5k (2018)- not green in debates but eventually produced greenest lip service plan
Nancy Pelosi 10k (2020)
Eric Swawell 7k (2020)
Tulsi Gabbard 6.5k (2020)
Rashida Talieb 4.6k (2020)
Pete Butigeig- was taking money from fossil fuel billionaires
Most of this can be found on opensecret.org
So that was a partial list of fake left politicians who directly or indirectly took fossil fuel money and many took that money even after they signed a no fossil fuel money pledge.
And if Panama is any indication this is only the tip of iceberg of the money they received where some or most of it would go in their pockets.
What we have in the way of progress on green is the because the global public and science demands it and not because of greenwashers on the fake left. Again, it is known that a lot of politicians on the left signed "no fossil fuel money pledges" but not known that the most prominent and most associated with the green movement then went ahead and took substantial fossil fuel money when they didn't have to. Why! Well, why did they have to make that pledge in the first place? Its all lip service. There were examples of politicians like Mark Takano that didn't sign such pledges or write lip services bills like the GND but also apparently took no fossil fuel money. What the fossil fuel money even a single dollar of it indicates is ownership and subservience to fossil fuel interests. What this marking means is fossil fuel interests can rely on a particular shill because they've literally been branded like cattle. These people might as well literally be in the pocket of the remaining Koch brother or other famous fossil fuel green washers like Bill Gates or Warren Buffet. Buffet surely had a lot to do with helping pitch the natural gas ponzi earlier on and he is like a buyer of last resort in its current wreckage. Don't know but strongly suspect it likely ties these politicians to off shore accounts (think David Cameron and Panama) and would guess it would also include shares in natural gas companies because surely fossil fuels interests want to create skin in the game for their puppets. And how could it not tie into the utterly failed PNAC and all that foreign influence through people like Epstein and the undue influence Russia and Israel have over US politics. But over and over again and in particular it must come down to issues over natural gas. The case for selling or having anything to do with natural gas is worse than the pushing of light cigarettes on teens and it it always was a total ponzi that people like Buffet helped foist (now he's been a buyer of last resort picking up the pieces.) When you think of slavery in the American South or when you think of apartheid in South Africa or the Mid East or the 3rd/4th reichs and getting rid of these it is important to realize getting rid of fossil fuels is the exact same issue for the same underlying reason. It comes down to Jefferson Davis's evil sought after "right to exploit" people and our necessary absolute rejection of that.
Now we know there is a bit of ponzi in most investments because for the investment to retain and gain value people must come on board and generally have to be constantly buying in with shares or product purchases but NG was a pure ponzi from the start with the worst sort or rent seeking ambitions behind it. And this ponzi helps explain the core of what has happened recently where the fake left seems to be going after EVs. They don't really want EVs they want lip service and compliance cars because pentration by real EVs or the solar vision of Tesla in particular destroys natural gas and the hydrogen long tail pipe Diesel Gate 2 scam. They are behind the scenes furious about the collapse of natural gas and its de-capitalization in favor of EVs and green energy generation.
Hillary Clinton was a natural gas sales woman under Bush-Cheney and her whole admin would have been about propping up Natural Gas as an idiotic 'bridge fuel.' Look at her core focus during Obama: Libya and the nonsense fight for a commodity the world no longer needs to make it seem relevant to keep the ponzi going. If you look a Biden, why would they run a senile Biden against Trump if they gave a damn? Well because the DNC is run by all of Hillary's natural gas lackeys who would run Biden. They'd be fine with Trump too because if you remember at the dinner that dinner guest recorded Trump was surrounded by nothing but natural gas salesmen and he's been pro fossil fuels not but not quite against Green in the ways that would allow them cover or to protect their natural gas scam or he hasn't been doing it good enough for them but they are fine with him hence only being able to choose select Biden- who didn't even want to run and will only run for one term.
Always thought the GOP was totally wed to fossil fuels and that was the core of its money, maybe so but I think the fake left is even more wed to it. Didn't see if Jay Inslee took any. Again what this is about is the fake place holder left's constituencies want fossil fuels dead yesterday so the puppets do this lip service game but they are really fossil fuel prostitutes. As above HIllary is a special case, when she was asked about taking fossil fuel money in 2016 she tried to say it was Sander's lies but people who looked into it said she took 5 million +, but presumably the core of her fortune said to be at a billion + is all tied up in natural gas which again is presumably part of why she got caught up Libya- more fighting over an inherently obsolete worthless resource- don't need natural gas for energy and don't even need it or fossil fuels for plastic or materials and it will never ever be cost competitive or actually profitable, never was. Hillary acted like it wasn't the public's business like she was totally entitled to take bribes. She said the same nonsense that they all say: oh it has not impacted my opinion on voting or policy-getting bribed for elections is expensive. That's like saying the money that changed hands wasn't for the sex or the sex didn't matter. Some try to say ok it was negligible or I didn't know about it. Of course we need a system where politicians taking money is again recognized as the worst kind of bribery- needing money to buy ads of all things and buy from the very sponsor owned media is not a justification it is bribe taking that favors the wealthy even in running as they wouldn't have to take bribes to buy ads. Possibly the worst irony is all the money comes back to the sponsors who own and control the hyper consolidated sponsored media it is like we pay them to censor our votes and when they want influence they don't do more than momentarily loan their nickels to their prostitutes who sell us out for the loan of nickles which come right back to the sponsors in a closed loop. But here its worst of all because this money marks them for the fossil fuel interests as: you're my *****!!! Note they did a lot of lip service and even made pledges that they wouldn't take it but still took it because they are blackmailed prostitutes and the taking of the money was a tightening of their collars to make sure they wouldn't act. For comparison why did GOPer Mitt Romney recently only get $50? Well, he is already wealthy and they know they don't have to buy him. But remember there are others like Mark Takano (D) in CA who didn't make lip service noise and didn't take money- but the fake left did almost without exception.
Hillary Clinton 5M (2016)
Barrack Obama 1.1 M (2008)
Betto O'rourke 500K (2020) most in the house
Bernie Sanders 235K (2020)
Elizebeth Warren 83K (2020)
Ed. Markey 65K recently
Kirsten Gillebrand 25k recent
Amy Klobuchar 64K (2020)
Joseph Biden 27k in (2008)- signed pledge but still taking FF money apparently
Adam Schiff 19K
Alexandria Occassio Cortez 11k (2020)
Lorena Gonzales largest contributor was fossil fuels may have close to 60K
Kamila Harris 6.5k (2018)- not green in debates but eventually produced greenest lip service plan
Nancy Pelosi 10k (2020)
Eric Swawell 7k (2020)
Tulsi Gabbard 6.5k (2020)
Rashida Talieb 4.6k (2020)
Pete Butigeig- was taking money from fossil fuel billionaires
Most of this can be found on opensecret.org
So that was a partial list of fake left politicians who directly or indirectly took fossil fuel money and many took that money even after they signed a no fossil fuel money pledge.
And if Panama is any indication this is only the tip of iceberg of the money they received where some or most of it would go in their pockets.
What we have in the way of progress on green is the because the global public and science demands it and not because of greenwashers on the fake left. Again, it is known that a lot of politicians on the left signed "no fossil fuel money pledges" but not known that the most prominent and most associated with the green movement then went ahead and took substantial fossil fuel money when they didn't have to. Why! Well, why did they have to make that pledge in the first place? Its all lip service. There were examples of politicians like Mark Takano that didn't sign such pledges or write lip services bills like the GND but also apparently took no fossil fuel money. What the fossil fuel money even a single dollar of it indicates is ownership and subservience to fossil fuel interests. What this marking means is fossil fuel interests can rely on a particular shill because they've literally been branded like cattle. These people might as well literally be in the pocket of the remaining Koch brother or other famous fossil fuel green washers like Bill Gates or Warren Buffet. Buffet surely had a lot to do with helping pitch the natural gas ponzi earlier on and he is like a buyer of last resort in its current wreckage. Don't know but strongly suspect it likely ties these politicians to off shore accounts (think David Cameron and Panama) and would guess it would also include shares in natural gas companies because surely fossil fuels interests want to create skin in the game for their puppets. And how could it not tie into the utterly failed PNAC and all that foreign influence through people like Epstein and the undue influence Russia and Israel have over US politics. But over and over again and in particular it must come down to issues over natural gas. The case for selling or having anything to do with natural gas is worse than the pushing of light cigarettes on teens and it it always was a total ponzi that people like Buffet helped foist (now he's been a buyer of last resort picking up the pieces.) When you think of slavery in the American South or when you think of apartheid in South Africa or the Mid East or the 3rd/4th reichs and getting rid of these it is important to realize getting rid of fossil fuels is the exact same issue for the same underlying reason. It comes down to Jefferson Davis's evil sought after "right to exploit" people and our necessary absolute rejection of that.
Now we know there is a bit of ponzi in most investments because for the investment to retain and gain value people must come on board and generally have to be constantly buying in with shares or product purchases but NG was a pure ponzi from the start with the worst sort or rent seeking ambitions behind it. And this ponzi helps explain the core of what has happened recently where the fake left seems to be going after EVs. They don't really want EVs they want lip service and compliance cars because pentration by real EVs or the solar vision of Tesla in particular destroys natural gas and the hydrogen long tail pipe Diesel Gate 2 scam. They are behind the scenes furious about the collapse of natural gas and its de-capitalization in favor of EVs and green energy generation.
Hillary Clinton was a natural gas sales woman under Bush-Cheney and her whole admin would have been about propping up Natural Gas as an idiotic 'bridge fuel.' Look at her core focus during Obama: Libya and the nonsense fight for a commodity the world no longer needs to make it seem relevant to keep the ponzi going. If you look a Biden, why would they run a senile Biden against Trump if they gave a damn? Well because the DNC is run by all of Hillary's natural gas lackeys who would run Biden. They'd be fine with Trump too because if you remember at the dinner that dinner guest recorded Trump was surrounded by nothing but natural gas salesmen and he's been pro fossil fuels not but not quite against Green in the ways that would allow them cover or to protect their natural gas scam or he hasn't been doing it good enough for them but they are fine with him hence only being able to choose select Biden- who didn't even want to run and will only run for one term.
Always thought the GOP was totally wed to fossil fuels and that was the core of its money, maybe so but I think the fake left is even more wed to it. Didn't see if Jay Inslee took any. Again what this is about is the fake place holder left's constituencies want fossil fuels dead yesterday so the puppets do this lip service game but they are really fossil fuel prostitutes. As above HIllary is a special case, when she was asked about taking fossil fuel money in 2016 she tried to say it was Sander's lies but people who looked into it said she took 5 million +, but presumably the core of her fortune said to be at a billion + is all tied up in natural gas which again is presumably part of why she got caught up Libya- more fighting over an inherently obsolete worthless resource- don't need natural gas for energy and don't even need it or fossil fuels for plastic or materials and it will never ever be cost competitive or actually profitable, never was. Hillary acted like it wasn't the public's business like she was totally entitled to take bribes. She said the same nonsense that they all say: oh it has not impacted my opinion on voting or policy-getting bribed for elections is expensive. That's like saying the money that changed hands wasn't for the sex or the sex didn't matter. Some try to say ok it was negligible or I didn't know about it. Of course we need a system where politicians taking money is again recognized as the worst kind of bribery- needing money to buy ads of all things and buy from the very sponsor owned media is not a justification it is bribe taking that favors the wealthy even in running as they wouldn't have to take bribes to buy ads. Possibly the worst irony is all the money comes back to the sponsors who own and control the hyper consolidated sponsored media it is like we pay them to censor our votes and when they want influence they don't do more than momentarily loan their nickels to their prostitutes who sell us out for the loan of nickles which come right back to the sponsors in a closed loop. But here its worst of all because this money marks them for the fossil fuel interests as: you're my *****!!! Note they did a lot of lip service and even made pledges that they wouldn't take it but still took it because they are blackmailed prostitutes and the taking of the money was a tightening of their collars to make sure they wouldn't act. For comparison why did GOPer Mitt Romney recently only get $50? Well, he is already wealthy and they know they don't have to buy him. But remember there are others like Mark Takano (D) in CA who didn't make lip service noise and didn't take money- but the fake left did almost without exception.
