What Ajit Pai and crew at the FCC wanted and the criminal Republicans that overturned the projections that had passed wanted is to take us back to the worst of all possible business models. Its the model where you pay a subscription and then are force fed modal ads. Subscription plus modal ads (force fed, takes up the whole screen, can't turn off) or subscription plus adds is the worst most abusive business model imaginable. It is always paired with channels too. In particular what they wanted with anti neutrality is locked in channels or the ability for businesses and employers to pay to censor. And on top of all this utter criminal crap they wanted to spy and sell people's private information- like selling the contents of people's telephone calls. And when every they would face a restriction on this criminality they would argue they they were at a competitive disadvantage (as if their balance sheets mattered at all in comparison to the public interest) as if they were providing competition when no competitive actual privacy based option was provided as an alternative to the criminality. And every time they would claim a change they would be lying and they would simply re-institute the same illegal practice and lie about it.
All we need is a precedent law and people to enforce it. Make it big. Tell Face Book or Microsoft along with the whole industry- claim to be complying with a change and we find out its no so and your board and management all go to prison for ten year, you get a 50 billion dollar fine and you forfeit 10 years of future profit- all minimums all irrevocable.
Where is the competitor that provides an alternative to their utter BS.
I am hoping that Starlink does- I don't buy that the cell density is too much in cities. Firms that don't serve the public interest should cease to exist, by having their charters yanked. For share holders don't invest in dumb criminal companies and it is your damn responsibility to know the difference or suffer the losses. When AT&T and Comcast started arguing against the public free speech rights, to me even if they were multinationals they lost their right to exist- government should and still needs to pull the plug on them and their share holders.
Ajit Pai and his crew has argued again and again that the rent seeking of people with criminal intent is the highest priority- we know what that make them. If a bureaucrat intentionally obviously, belligerently undermines he public interest there should be nothing and no statute of limitations that can protect them from full example setting incarceration.
Fraudulence is always trying to project onto good it own image to try to say its the norm. Seems to be one of the reasons so much FUD manufacture is aimed at Tesla. Tesla is far from perfect, its still a bloody corporation but it is aimed so far at doing good. Oh look a provider provides actual privacy- better if they just sell hand set in hard encrypted mesh requiring no service with free long distance- and then ignore the demands and claims of fraud inc when they try to shut it down and take away- these people can be Skyped to pieces. Imagine only the worst most degenerate fraud and criminality would have ever allowed Verizon to be anything but a dumb pipe- people aren't property. Would we allow Verizon to microphone everyone's homes as Google tried and then being all in bed with terrorist surveillance state creeps- if we needed protection it would be from such a state.
This stuff is such a slippery slope. In the EU they make chemicals added to food have to shown to be safe- in the US for no other reason than greed (not food spoilage) they allow beta testing experiments where these drugs are added without knowledge or consent- see the difference? GPRD is flawed- too commerce friendly but a start. What CA did was a start. The break ups will be a start, need to break up AT&T and Comcast as well.
All we need is a precedent law and people to enforce it. Make it big. Tell Face Book or Microsoft along with the whole industry- claim to be complying with a change and we find out its no so and your board and management all go to prison for ten year, you get a 50 billion dollar fine and you forfeit 10 years of future profit- all minimums all irrevocable.
Where is the competitor that provides an alternative to their utter BS.
I am hoping that Starlink does- I don't buy that the cell density is too much in cities. Firms that don't serve the public interest should cease to exist, by having their charters yanked. For share holders don't invest in dumb criminal companies and it is your damn responsibility to know the difference or suffer the losses. When AT&T and Comcast started arguing against the public free speech rights, to me even if they were multinationals they lost their right to exist- government should and still needs to pull the plug on them and their share holders.
Ajit Pai and his crew has argued again and again that the rent seeking of people with criminal intent is the highest priority- we know what that make them. If a bureaucrat intentionally obviously, belligerently undermines he public interest there should be nothing and no statute of limitations that can protect them from full example setting incarceration.
Fraudulence is always trying to project onto good it own image to try to say its the norm. Seems to be one of the reasons so much FUD manufacture is aimed at Tesla. Tesla is far from perfect, its still a bloody corporation but it is aimed so far at doing good. Oh look a provider provides actual privacy- better if they just sell hand set in hard encrypted mesh requiring no service with free long distance- and then ignore the demands and claims of fraud inc when they try to shut it down and take away- these people can be Skyped to pieces. Imagine only the worst most degenerate fraud and criminality would have ever allowed Verizon to be anything but a dumb pipe- people aren't property. Would we allow Verizon to microphone everyone's homes as Google tried and then being all in bed with terrorist surveillance state creeps- if we needed protection it would be from such a state.
This stuff is such a slippery slope. In the EU they make chemicals added to food have to shown to be safe- in the US for no other reason than greed (not food spoilage) they allow beta testing experiments where these drugs are added without knowledge or consent- see the difference? GPRD is flawed- too commerce friendly but a start. What CA did was a start. The break ups will be a start, need to break up AT&T and Comcast as well.