ISS and Black Rock are simple saboteurs, and dilution shouldn't be giving more power to these saboteurs. It wasn't long ago that Black Rock was trying to put its fossil fuel's first CEO on the Tesla board- can you imagine how stupid that would have been. What was she doing on the Apple board- Black Rock is a fossil fuel hedge fund! Black Rock and ISS and their ilk are not owners in any legitimate sense and need to be ejected- they are parasites and saboteurs. Bernstein's Tony Saconaghi was suggesting diluting equity at the earnings report meeting and now there is this rule coming in drop the super majority vote, this is all an attempt to eject Musk because he is putting pressure on obsolete fossil fuel junk. That wasn't an accident, Bernstein, Blackrock, Goldman- all collude together cut from the same cloth.
I was a bit surprised that Goldman was allowed in on the take private deal. Goldman will go bankrupt if Tesla scales it success because of all of its crap derivatives insuring permanently stranded fossil fuel non-assets- the real cause of the last crash all over again. What Goldman needs is a long term profit forfeiture, court supervision and massive permanent restructuring or better yet quo warranto (the corporate death penalty) because its opposition against Glass Stiegall signals its therefore being in favor of bail-ins means suggests its being run by idiot psychopaths that think the US can handle Cypriot style bail ins when the already criminal austerity fails and not repeat how Mussolini met his end for many politicians with billionaires fleeing the country running for their lives being hunted the globe over or worse with civil war- apparently these are the guys with the we are the 1% (.00001) penthouse banners during OWS. It should get that just for bribing our politicians. It is critical that these saboteurs not be allowed to claim they are investors with any meaningful 'rights,' they are saboteurs pure and simple. So diluting voting rights with more of their money really puts the survival of the firm in the cross hairs because their goal is to kill the firm to protect their other incredibly stupid and backwards investments that given the threat they present to humanity shouldn't have been allowed in the first place and are really criminal- these firms shouldn't have freedom to dig the hole deeper what they should have is liquidation and contract voiding.
Better to get loans from the Chinese government than dilute with more Black Rock. And while we're at it, Sonnenberg at Yale- who gives sht what a fossil fuel university crank thinks- this isn't about further ill-gotten gain for parasites it is about saving everyone's lives. I wonder if the rest of Tesla's actual investors could bring suit against these obvious saboteurs- they can't claim they are in it for selfish gain, only for selfish sabotage and for obvious conflicts of interest. Too many obvious conflicts of interest for instance it makes not sense that Ford should have been able to invest in Rivian, we don't need the interlocking board bs- Ford gets to spy and slow down to protect its petrol scam for a pittance of 500m.
Note Tamberino's from Goldman's ratings:
https://www.tipranks.com/analysts/david-tamberrino
Note how low Tamberino's accuracy rate is. Like to know the 'analyst' with the greatest Tesla accuracy, if it is too high especially in the negative direction you know it is part of the useless rigged no value added Wall St. scam.
I was a bit surprised that Goldman was allowed in on the take private deal. Goldman will go bankrupt if Tesla scales it success because of all of its crap derivatives insuring permanently stranded fossil fuel non-assets- the real cause of the last crash all over again. What Goldman needs is a long term profit forfeiture, court supervision and massive permanent restructuring or better yet quo warranto (the corporate death penalty) because its opposition against Glass Stiegall signals its therefore being in favor of bail-ins means suggests its being run by idiot psychopaths that think the US can handle Cypriot style bail ins when the already criminal austerity fails and not repeat how Mussolini met his end for many politicians with billionaires fleeing the country running for their lives being hunted the globe over or worse with civil war- apparently these are the guys with the we are the 1% (.00001) penthouse banners during OWS. It should get that just for bribing our politicians. It is critical that these saboteurs not be allowed to claim they are investors with any meaningful 'rights,' they are saboteurs pure and simple. So diluting voting rights with more of their money really puts the survival of the firm in the cross hairs because their goal is to kill the firm to protect their other incredibly stupid and backwards investments that given the threat they present to humanity shouldn't have been allowed in the first place and are really criminal- these firms shouldn't have freedom to dig the hole deeper what they should have is liquidation and contract voiding.
Better to get loans from the Chinese government than dilute with more Black Rock. And while we're at it, Sonnenberg at Yale- who gives sht what a fossil fuel university crank thinks- this isn't about further ill-gotten gain for parasites it is about saving everyone's lives. I wonder if the rest of Tesla's actual investors could bring suit against these obvious saboteurs- they can't claim they are in it for selfish gain, only for selfish sabotage and for obvious conflicts of interest. Too many obvious conflicts of interest for instance it makes not sense that Ford should have been able to invest in Rivian, we don't need the interlocking board bs- Ford gets to spy and slow down to protect its petrol scam for a pittance of 500m.
Note Tamberino's from Goldman's ratings:
https://www.tipranks.com/analysts/david-tamberrino
Note how low Tamberino's accuracy rate is. Like to know the 'analyst' with the greatest Tesla accuracy, if it is too high especially in the negative direction you know it is part of the useless rigged no value added Wall St. scam.