Question is why is Gates on Quantumscape board?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 101101
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 9
  • Views Views 3K

101101

Well-Known Member
Tesla has their own anode free tech and patents but two Tesla alumni are also on the QS board JB Straubel and Brad Buss. But why should Gates be on the board? Saying that the QS people were foolish enough to take money from him isn't an answer. Since leaving the MS and Berkshire boards he may have more time. He may want to rub elbows with the VW guy on the board as MS has been courting VW. But the main thing is QS tech seems like its been delayed be a decade just like happened with Gate's Terra power.

To me Gates isn't just a green washer he is anti green. He scuttles green things including green companies, tech and policies and is pretty overt in his outright support of fossil fuels. Recently when he was again saying that the Tesla Semi wasn't plausible it was timed to give fossil fuel foot dragger GM a boost on its game with the Nikola scam. Buffet and Berkshire are in GM (Buffet and Birkshire do token green e.g. after they got involved with BYD the solar panels came off the BYD buss roofs- they were running EV busses all day on the roof top panels.)

Remember where GM was on CARB. The Nikola thing is interesting as GM based on performance and obvious intent can't access
capital markets or debt on acceptable terms.
And Nikola seems to be a shell play. GM could never make a FCV Chevy Colorado seem viable- because it isn't (and the Nikola Badger sure as hell doesn't- its a short in the pants small truck with some led light and a varmint name) but it could fluff up a shell company with a bunch of Enron style mark to market can kicking claimes and then pretend to partner with obvious later acquisition intent (scrape out the hyped stock value) and follow by scamming the BEV vehicle tax credits that it ran out of on its compliance vehicles like the outsourced Bolt. With this shell game it can try to take more public money but still be a compliance foot dragger on its kicking the can to its next bankruptcy- this also makes this place holder company look like its doing something.
But GM will still be bringing its way out of date tech which won't get them anywhere and Nikola has nothing except the semi truck body shell which some say may have been pilfered from Walmart- and a render of a Chevy Colorado in aftermarket trinkets with vermin label not worth much.

Nikola's vaporware promotions and GMs battery day and GM's Lyric "where's the beef" presentation and its constant projections of no advatage for Tesla through people like Lutz remind so much of Enron and its "mark to market" scam and then its kick the can acquisition of PG&E. But this is what you always get with the natural gas rent seeker ponzi culture, lie, lie, lie...

They think natural gas will continue to be allowed to be part of the energy mix- it won't. It won't continued to existence as it is not compatible with Paris and there is no tech that could ever fix it. Plus the pozi is a massive rip off and society is paying massively inflated prices for it. It can't survive at current prices and it needs energy prices to keep going up without limit when they must fall for reasons (technical) political and economical. But idiotically they think they will be able to lie their way to successfully implementimg a scam much bigger than diesel gate- a scam bigger than 911 and Iraq WMD and Libya and Afrganistan combined would be required and one that flipped the will of the people of the world and of EU and China to sell 3x as much natural gas in hydrogen as would be needed to replace gasoline with natural gas and they are supposed to be able to be allowed to do this because 100 years from now a closed loop system might finally not add polution and might compete on price. And they think they will be allowed until 2050 to slowly roll this scam out when they don't even have a year to perpetrate it and their scams have more exposure than ever. No, these are lying idiot arguments.
No, much easier to zero out these people's foolish investments they were never entitled to a return and they have already been paid off countless times over.
 
Recently when he was again saying that the Tesla Semi wasn't plausible

Actually, Bill Gates said that a LONG HAUL electric semi is not practical. The reason is simple arithmetic. A long haul truck is typically driven 600 to 650 miles each day, but has a range of over 800 miles. The maximum gross weight is 80,000 pounds. The average diesel semi with an empty trailer has a weight of 35,000 pounds. That results in a payload of 45,000 pounds. The proposed Tesla semi has a maximum range of 500 miles, but in order not to be stranded, the practical range is no more than perhaps 400 miles. The estimated battery weight for that truck is a staggering 16,000 pounds and at today's prices costs $180,000.

In the United States, semi trucks are limited to a weight of 80,000 pounds or less, including the empty weight of the vehicle. The heavier the truck, the less it’s allowed to carry. An electric semi will not be able to carry as large a load as a diesel semi. It will not be able to be driven as far each day. It will cost substantially more to purchase.

There is the claim that the reduced maintenance and fuel costs will make a long haul electric semi cheaper to operate. This is debatable. Diesel engines are already incredibly reliable. Electricity is not free and at this time does not include the highway use tax.

https://www.thetruckersreport.com/infographics/cost-of-trucking/

Short haul electric trucks make sense. Short haul trucks are typically driven within a 150 mile radius. They return to the same dispatch location each day. Short haul optimizes the strengths of electric. Bill Gates spoke favorably concerning the prospects of short haul electric trucks, garbage trucks, and buses.

I just don't understand why Elon Musk is frequently such a jerk. Remember when Musk insulted Unsworth by calling him a “pedo guy” on Twitter. Just because Unsworth said Musk's cave submarine wouldn't work. (It didn't.) Now, Musk is insulting Bill Gates for similarly dissing Musk's electric semi. Back on Mar 6, 2020, Elon Musk Tweeted: "The coronavirus panic is dumb". Musk also predicted in March that the US would see "probably close to zero" new COVID-19 cases by the end of April.
 
A few minor corrections.

1. The Tesla Semis range has been upgraded to 600 miles.

2. Right before his coment, Unsworth told Musk to shove the sub up his arse. How would you feel if someone insulated the hard work of your employees?
 
@gooki You're definitely right and I was definitely wrong about Gates being a board member that is not his role- looked at where I got the info from and it doesn't say Gates is a board member- his role is apparently a major backer helping it IPO etc. So if I am not mistaken here as well he through one of his ventures is helping finance it like with Terra Power. My appologies my intent was not to mislead anyone.
Where did you ready Bill was on the Quantumspace board?
https://www.quantumscape.com/team/

Glad he's not on the board, but his involvement can't be good. As for his coments they at total bs- are we to believe he is that ignorant? No, a charitable interpretation is he is lying and only involved to scuttle. As for modern semis being reliable- no they are not and they are expensive to maintain because of failure prone parts. Its as dumb as the natural gas industries claimes that it is cheap- its 20x over priced relative to its radically superior no compromise green replacement- or that its clean, no it super dirty or most laughable of all their talking point bs that it is necessary- it is only necessary to get rid of it.
 
Its as dumb as the natural gas industries claimes that it is cheap- its 20x over priced relative to its radically superior no compromise green replacement- or that its clean, no it super dirty or most laughable of all their talking point bs that it is necessary- it is only necessary to get rid of it.
OK, if NG is so bad, please explain why the US led the world last year in C02 emission reductions. Wouldn't have happened without fracking.
https://www.dailywire.com/news/united-states-led-entire-world-in-reducing-co2-emissions-in-2019
 
A few minor corrections.

1. The Tesla Semis range has been upgraded to 600 miles.

2. Right before his coment, Unsworth told Musk to shove the sub up his arse. How would you feel if someone insulated the hard work of your employees?

The Tesla Semi's range is 620 miles EMPTY, which is not very useful. Tesla states 500 miles on their website.

I'm sure that Unsworth never "insulated" (sic) any of Musk's employees or their work. Instead, as an expert in caves, he insulted Elon Musk. Musk claimed, with no evidence, that Unsworth was/is a criminal pedophile. Musk also didn't let it go, but instead doubled down. I just don't understand why the reportedly 4th richest person on the planet frequently behaves like such a jerk.
 
The semi range IS NOT 620 miles empty that is full load. The 620 is the Roadster's range. Just says over 600 for Semi unless you can find something newer but also clear that's full load. This seems like all this in denial stuff where they are in disbelief they keep getting beat out loud and are in denial.
 
That is the biggest line of crap in history, NG sucks in every measurable way to a level that is beyond belief. Its fraud just based on contracts when a new NG plant is installed- need to go back after every politician that signed off on any new ng plant and need to void any lock in on buying anything from those plants at 20x over price per khw. Need rip that stuff out of thr ground. Putting new battery backed solar in after new NG and ripping out the NG and writing off that scrape is much cheaper and way more reliable and acutually clean.

What drop there was came from a lot coal going off line. Other aspect is admin is surely lying about the degree of difference and really NG is not that much better than coal all things considered and its more expensive- its much worse politically. But no NG plant ever should have gone in. Should have been solar battery backed then wind battery backed and hydro and then nuclear, then geo but NG never should have been even as an option. NG is as dumb and wrong as lead in the gas. We have to criminalize it and start to treat it as the criminal conspiracy it is- go back and look at Enron, NG existed before Enron but its a metastacized cancer cell that will kill the host.
OK, if NG is so bad, please explain why the US led the world last year in C02 emission reductions. Wouldn't have happened without fracking.
https://www.dailywire.com/news/united-states-led-entire-world-in-reducing-co2-emissions-in-2019
I
 
I'm sure that Unsworth never "insulated" (sic) any of Musk's employees or their work. Instead, as an expert in caves, he insulted Elon Musk. Musk claimed, with no evidence, that Unsworth was/is a criminal pedophile. Musk also didn't let it go, but instead doubled down. I just don't understand why the reportedly 4th richest person on the planet frequently behaves like such a jerk.

Because nobody is perfect. Seriously do we expect people to be perfect all the time? Do you act perfectly when insulted, and the work of your friends/coworkers is insulted?

FWIW Musk deleted that tweet pretty damn quick. He knew it wasn't his best hour.

Either way good to see Musk is continuing to be a jerk and calling out Bill on this one in regards to semi trucks.

He has no clue
 
Back
Top