Too expensive to qualify.
https://www.irs.gov/credits-deducti...ied-clean-vehicles-purchased-in-2023-or-after
https://www.irs.gov/credits-deducti...ied-clean-vehicles-purchased-in-2023-or-after
I think the US Government has like 4 or 5 different definitions of SUV, and I think the one IRS is using has 3 rows and AWD as clarifiers.The IRS regs are odd. It appears that they're applying the $80K limit on MSRP that applies to SUVs only to AWD models. A lot of less expensive crossovers without AWD, including the Mustang Mach-E and most versions of the VW ID4, are also being capped at $55K. This seems arbitrary to me. Is there a written explanation of the criteria they're using?
The VW doesn't have 3 rows and the Pro AWD qualifies as an SUV.I think the US Government has like 4 or 5 different definitions of SUV, and I think the one IRS is using has 3 rows and AWD as clarifiers.
didn't say it had to have both.The VW doesn't have 3 rows and the Pro AWD qualifies as an SUV.
It does qualify now, this is a VERY old thread before changes in the requirements were announced that made it qualify.I'm missing why they Lyriq doesn't qualify for tax credit. Does the Lyriq cost more than $80k?