Asleep at the wheel thesis debunked by @tesla_truth now LA/NY Times new shill talking point is battery fires
NHTSA rates Teslas as safest cars ever but now suddenly because of the fossil fuel industry pay offs the batteries need to be looked at? The statistics show these are the safest cars and SUVs ever. But suddenly there is a burn problem relative to say the order of magnitude higher rates of gas tank fires and fatal results. Remember when Mathematician Taleb Nasim said it was BS and they shut up for a while? Remember that this FUD coincides with other automakers including BMW and Ford facing global recalls for spontaneous combustion of ICE vehicles that were parked and turned off. Surely prior to facing injunctions around the world those makes (source of the actual problems) faced agency scrutiny and what about constant NY/LA Times shill scrutiny on that? Where is the reporting on them.
I have a concern that what he NHTSC may be doing or involved with beyond trying to forward an idiot short thesis is help in the theft and distribution of trade and IP secrets. They want to specifically look at the battery management software. Is this because certain competitors are upset about the magic Tesla can work with it. I think we shouldn't forget that Tesla is setting the pace and the fossil fuel industry wants a narrative where only kind of EV that can be made is a fully compromised weird mobile that allows them to claim EVs were tried but not preferred. And let us not forget the path of least resistance is for the ICE makers to find a way to go back to ICE.
And this latest crash in Florida with all the FUD- there have been tons of these in Florida- is that a real person? I really seriously question if it is. No disrespect to any family or anyone who may have lost a loved one but really seriously- this feels like BS. And if someone did die was it murder where the car was rigged ahead of ahead of time? And would we get a fair reporting in Florida? Remember Florida is where the precedent allowing Monsanto to pay Fox to lie even to the point of firing the anchors about rBST safety was allowed- yes pay to lie to the public about a matter of massive public interest. And remember @tesal_truth got banned from Twitter permanently for debunking this short BS thesis stuff. Look at the prior story about the former navy seal that supposedly helped get Osama who was watching Disney for 7 minutes with the alarm going off prior o impact who was an IT expert who supposedly was decapitated where half of the Seal Team 6 that he was part (that supposedly got Osama) disappeared in a helicopter crash just prior- well that happened in Williston Florida. Notice the trouble with the trapped soccer team had a bunch of SEALs in the narrative. Another crash leading to suit in Fort Lauderdale Florida with fire as supposed issue. And another recent suit in Delray Beach in Florida with what appear to be doctored traffic light footage.
Notice the how the big fires are mainly in CA out beyond even climate change but most of what the news talks about is Syria. And this time it is being used to justify terrorizing black outs just like with the Enron fraud. What is this- are these deliberately set fires even out beyond climate change? This is the admin that tried to call automakers attempting to pursue higher emissions standards an anti-trust violation and tried to say lower fuel economy made cars safer- it tells psychopathic obvious idiotic lies all the time right down to its policy positions- it seems to hire the worst most incompetent corrupt people not the best. Notice from 2012- 2017 Toyota was the only automaker went backwards on both average miles and CO2- notice which side it was on- same side as GM.
Mississippi burning KKK fossil fuel supporting regime head is now changing his residence to Florida. Starting to notice a pattern of burning (Teslas) and the south and Florida. Fossil fuels and white power etc. Two latest crashes occurred in Trumps new/old home town area on the cost between the Maralago and Doral resorts equidistant within that thin 100 mile stretch. Just looking at the GOP faces on the hill the other day and its snow white no diversity, you can tell that just from the last names. The other party is now fully diverse. I was also looking at the felony conviction record between the two parties since Nixon at federal and governor high state office levels and the GOP has 153 convictions to 3 for the DNC- not saying the DNC especially the sell-out criminal moderates is not corrupted but you can see the difference. But a thesis I have is that fossil fuels are the new cotton, the new civil rights the new racism, the are associated in the minds of more tribal less mature whites with white power and status.
And thinking about this new regime. If a President makes an unequivocal racist remark in public isn't that an attempt to terrorize and a betrayal of the public and shouldn't it lead to immediate removal? What about nepotism? Installing family members qualified or not appears be strong corruption. No family member should even be able to run for 100 years. Why? Well, in a monarchy someone one's ego due to total power is inflated to the point where they become an expression of pretty absolute evil and everyone subject to them would have been better off murdered because they will live out forfeit lives where everyone they might risk loving or do love is held hostage with a gun to their head from birth in service to some all powerful idiot ego. To me human extinction would seem preferable to such an empowered ego and everyone else reduced to property reinforced by our current existential tech. Would we want to live under Nazi rule reinforced by the tech of today?
What should we think and do about efforts or even tendencies to try to go in that direction?
All that said regulatory review of tech need not be a bad thing and is a good thing because it is transparency and due process but there should be an actual safety issue where some effort to hold other makers to the same standards. Can't pick out the safest makes and say that its deficient for its safer stuff- that nakedly looks like an attempt to say that a competitor's strength is a weakness. LG had some issues with some batteries a while back but that is not what this is, those were brand new products with frequent problems, these are old products subjected to the most extreme situations where fires would ordinarily and unexpectedly result and he claimed cases in the media appear to be cooked up as part of a concerted campaign. People need to look into this.
NHTSA rates Teslas as safest cars ever but now suddenly because of the fossil fuel industry pay offs the batteries need to be looked at? The statistics show these are the safest cars and SUVs ever. But suddenly there is a burn problem relative to say the order of magnitude higher rates of gas tank fires and fatal results. Remember when Mathematician Taleb Nasim said it was BS and they shut up for a while? Remember that this FUD coincides with other automakers including BMW and Ford facing global recalls for spontaneous combustion of ICE vehicles that were parked and turned off. Surely prior to facing injunctions around the world those makes (source of the actual problems) faced agency scrutiny and what about constant NY/LA Times shill scrutiny on that? Where is the reporting on them.
I have a concern that what he NHTSC may be doing or involved with beyond trying to forward an idiot short thesis is help in the theft and distribution of trade and IP secrets. They want to specifically look at the battery management software. Is this because certain competitors are upset about the magic Tesla can work with it. I think we shouldn't forget that Tesla is setting the pace and the fossil fuel industry wants a narrative where only kind of EV that can be made is a fully compromised weird mobile that allows them to claim EVs were tried but not preferred. And let us not forget the path of least resistance is for the ICE makers to find a way to go back to ICE.
And this latest crash in Florida with all the FUD- there have been tons of these in Florida- is that a real person? I really seriously question if it is. No disrespect to any family or anyone who may have lost a loved one but really seriously- this feels like BS. And if someone did die was it murder where the car was rigged ahead of ahead of time? And would we get a fair reporting in Florida? Remember Florida is where the precedent allowing Monsanto to pay Fox to lie even to the point of firing the anchors about rBST safety was allowed- yes pay to lie to the public about a matter of massive public interest. And remember @tesal_truth got banned from Twitter permanently for debunking this short BS thesis stuff. Look at the prior story about the former navy seal that supposedly helped get Osama who was watching Disney for 7 minutes with the alarm going off prior o impact who was an IT expert who supposedly was decapitated where half of the Seal Team 6 that he was part (that supposedly got Osama) disappeared in a helicopter crash just prior- well that happened in Williston Florida. Notice the trouble with the trapped soccer team had a bunch of SEALs in the narrative. Another crash leading to suit in Fort Lauderdale Florida with fire as supposed issue. And another recent suit in Delray Beach in Florida with what appear to be doctored traffic light footage.
Notice the how the big fires are mainly in CA out beyond even climate change but most of what the news talks about is Syria. And this time it is being used to justify terrorizing black outs just like with the Enron fraud. What is this- are these deliberately set fires even out beyond climate change? This is the admin that tried to call automakers attempting to pursue higher emissions standards an anti-trust violation and tried to say lower fuel economy made cars safer- it tells psychopathic obvious idiotic lies all the time right down to its policy positions- it seems to hire the worst most incompetent corrupt people not the best. Notice from 2012- 2017 Toyota was the only automaker went backwards on both average miles and CO2- notice which side it was on- same side as GM.
Mississippi burning KKK fossil fuel supporting regime head is now changing his residence to Florida. Starting to notice a pattern of burning (Teslas) and the south and Florida. Fossil fuels and white power etc. Two latest crashes occurred in Trumps new/old home town area on the cost between the Maralago and Doral resorts equidistant within that thin 100 mile stretch. Just looking at the GOP faces on the hill the other day and its snow white no diversity, you can tell that just from the last names. The other party is now fully diverse. I was also looking at the felony conviction record between the two parties since Nixon at federal and governor high state office levels and the GOP has 153 convictions to 3 for the DNC- not saying the DNC especially the sell-out criminal moderates is not corrupted but you can see the difference. But a thesis I have is that fossil fuels are the new cotton, the new civil rights the new racism, the are associated in the minds of more tribal less mature whites with white power and status.
And thinking about this new regime. If a President makes an unequivocal racist remark in public isn't that an attempt to terrorize and a betrayal of the public and shouldn't it lead to immediate removal? What about nepotism? Installing family members qualified or not appears be strong corruption. No family member should even be able to run for 100 years. Why? Well, in a monarchy someone one's ego due to total power is inflated to the point where they become an expression of pretty absolute evil and everyone subject to them would have been better off murdered because they will live out forfeit lives where everyone they might risk loving or do love is held hostage with a gun to their head from birth in service to some all powerful idiot ego. To me human extinction would seem preferable to such an empowered ego and everyone else reduced to property reinforced by our current existential tech. Would we want to live under Nazi rule reinforced by the tech of today?
What should we think and do about efforts or even tendencies to try to go in that direction?
All that said regulatory review of tech need not be a bad thing and is a good thing because it is transparency and due process but there should be an actual safety issue where some effort to hold other makers to the same standards. Can't pick out the safest makes and say that its deficient for its safer stuff- that nakedly looks like an attempt to say that a competitor's strength is a weakness. LG had some issues with some batteries a while back but that is not what this is, those were brand new products with frequent problems, these are old products subjected to the most extreme situations where fires would ordinarily and unexpectedly result and he claimed cases in the media appear to be cooked up as part of a concerted campaign. People need to look into this.
