IIHS wants more driver nags

bwilson4web

Well-Known Member
Subscriber
Source: Drivers quickly learn to skirt limits set by partial automation systems

. . .
In the second study, a different group of IIHS and AgeLab researchers examined how the driving behavior of 14 people who had never used Tesla’s Autopilot or any other partial automation system changed over a month of driving a 2020 Tesla Model 3. Unlike the Volvo study, this one focused on how often the drivers triggered the system’s initial attention reminders, escalated warnings and emergency slowdown and lockout procedures.
. . .
In total, the volunteers drove a little more than 12,000 miles with Autopilot engaged. During that time, they triggered 3,858 attention-related warnings from the partial automation system. About half of those alerts occurred when they had at least one hand on the steering wheel but were apparently not moving it enough to satisfy the torque sensor.

Most warnings didn’t proceed beyond the initial attention reminder, and, on average, the drivers responded to the alert within about three seconds (usually by nudging the steering wheel). In 72 instances, however, the driver didn’t respond fast enough to prevent the alerts from escalating. Remarkably, 16 of these escalations — 12 of them from one driver and four from three others — persisted through the entire sequence to result in the driver being locked out of the system.
. . .

Bob Wilson
 
This certainly doesn't apply to the VW id.4. The lane assist which I sometimes call "lame assist" actually works quite well in keeping the car centred in the lane without any excess wandering. However, one has to be almost constantly giving the wheel a little tug to keep the warnings off. I sometimes get so annoyed with the constant warnings I just turn it off and drive the car normally. It's good enough to reach for that coffee or change something on the touch screen and that's about it.
 
Back
Top